From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56972) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dO0Ki-0003Zb-Ce for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 07:31:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dO0Kf-0002YW-8l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 07:31:32 -0400 References: <20170622112648.24815-1-lvivier@redhat.com> From: Thomas Huth Message-ID: Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 13:31:24 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170622112648.24815-1-lvivier@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target/ppc/cpu-models: set POWER9_v1.0 as POWER9 DD1 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Laurent Vivier , David Gibson Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 22.06.2017 13:26, Laurent Vivier wrote: > CPU_POWERPC_POWER9_DD1 is 0x004E0100, so this is the POWER9 v1.0. > > When we run qemu on a POWER9 DD1 host, we must use either > "-cpu host" or "-cpu POWER9", but in the latter case it fails with > > Unable to find sPAPR CPU Core definition > > because POWER9 DD1 doesn't appear in the list of known CPUs. > > This patch fixes this by defining POWER9_v1.0 with POWER9 DD1 > PVR instead of CPU_POWERPC_POWER9_BASE. > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier > --- > target/ppc/cpu-models.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/target/ppc/cpu-models.c b/target/ppc/cpu-models.c > index 4d3e635..a22363c 100644 > --- a/target/ppc/cpu-models.c > +++ b/target/ppc/cpu-models.c > @@ -1144,7 +1144,7 @@ > POWERPC_DEF("970_v2.2", CPU_POWERPC_970_v22, 970, > "PowerPC 970 v2.2") > > - POWERPC_DEF("POWER9_v1.0", CPU_POWERPC_POWER9_BASE, POWER9, > + POWERPC_DEF("POWER9_v1.0", CPU_POWERPC_POWER9_DD1, POWER9, > "POWER9 v1.0") > > POWERPC_DEF("970fx_v1.0", CPU_POWERPC_970FX_v10, 970, > I think this also makes sense for running in TCG mode to get a valid real PVR there. Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth