All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [RFC REBASED 3/5] powerpc/mm/slice: implement slice_check_range_fits
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 19:12:26 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <caa9d52e0a8ef15719bafe8002a4ad2dc359c634.1518382747.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <02a62db83282b5ef3e0e8281fdc46fa91beffc86.1518382747.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>

Rather than build slice masks from a range then use that to check for
fit in a candidate mask, implement slice_check_range_fits that checks
if a range fits in a mask directly.

This allows several structures to be removed from stacks, and also we
don't expect a huge range in a lot of these cases, so building and
comparing a full mask is going to be more expensive than testing just
one or two bits of the range.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
---
 arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c
index ddf015d2d05b..311168ca3939 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c
@@ -233,22 +233,36 @@ static const struct slice_mask *slice_mask_for_size(struct mm_struct *mm, int ps
 #error "Must define the slice masks for page sizes supported by the platform"
 #endif
 
-static int slice_check_fit(struct mm_struct *mm,
-			   const struct slice_mask *mask,
-			   const struct slice_mask *available)
+static bool slice_check_range_fits(struct mm_struct *mm,
+			   const struct slice_mask *available,
+			   unsigned long start, unsigned long len)
 {
-	DECLARE_BITMAP(result, SLICE_NUM_HIGH);
-	/*
-	 * Make sure we just do bit compare only to the max
-	 * addr limit and not the full bit map size.
-	 */
-	unsigned long slice_count = GET_HIGH_SLICE_INDEX(mm->context.slb_addr_limit);
+	unsigned long end = start + len - 1;
+	u64 low_slices = 0;
+
+	if (start < SLICE_LOW_TOP) {
+		unsigned long mend = min(end,
+					 (unsigned long)(SLICE_LOW_TOP - 1));
+
+		low_slices = (1u << (GET_LOW_SLICE_INDEX(mend) + 1))
+				- (1u << GET_LOW_SLICE_INDEX(start));
+	}
+	if ((low_slices & available->low_slices) != low_slices)
+		return false;
+
+	if ((start + len) > SLICE_LOW_TOP) {
+		unsigned long start_index = GET_HIGH_SLICE_INDEX(start);
+		unsigned long align_end = ALIGN(end, (1UL << SLICE_HIGH_SHIFT));
+		unsigned long count = GET_HIGH_SLICE_INDEX(align_end) - start_index;
+		unsigned long i;
 
-	slice_bitmap_and(result, mask->high_slices, available->high_slices,
-			 slice_count);
+		for (i = start_index; i < start_index + count; i++) {
+			if (!test_bit(i, available->high_slices))
+				return false;
+		}
+	}
 
-	return (mask->low_slices & available->low_slices) == mask->low_slices &&
-		slice_bitmap_equal(result, mask->high_slices, slice_count);
+	return true;
 }
 
 static void slice_flush_segments(void *parm)
@@ -519,12 +533,6 @@ unsigned long slice_get_unmapped_area(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
 		on_each_cpu(slice_flush_segments, mm, 1);
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * init different masks
-	 */
-	mask.low_slices = 0;
-	slice_bitmap_zero(mask.high_slices, SLICE_NUM_HIGH);
-
 	/* silence stupid warning */;
 	potential_mask.low_slices = 0;
 	slice_bitmap_zero(potential_mask.high_slices, SLICE_NUM_HIGH);
@@ -586,15 +594,11 @@ unsigned long slice_get_unmapped_area(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
 #endif
 
 	/* First check hint if it's valid or if we have MAP_FIXED */
-	if (addr != 0 || fixed) {
-		/* Build a mask for the requested range */
-		slice_range_to_mask(addr, len, &mask);
-		slice_print_mask(" mask", &mask);
-
+	if (addr || fixed) {
 		/* Check if we fit in the good mask. If we do, we just return,
 		 * nothing else to do
 		 */
-		if (slice_check_fit(mm, &mask, &good_mask)) {
+		if (slice_check_range_fits(mm, &good_mask, addr, len)) {
 			slice_dbg(" fits good !\n");
 			return addr;
 		}
@@ -620,10 +624,11 @@ unsigned long slice_get_unmapped_area(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
 	slice_or_mask(&potential_mask, &good_mask);
 	slice_print_mask(" potential", &potential_mask);
 
-	if ((addr != 0 || fixed) &&
-			slice_check_fit(mm, &mask, &potential_mask)) {
-		slice_dbg(" fits potential !\n");
-		goto convert;
+	if (addr || fixed) {
+		if (slice_check_range_fits(mm, &potential_mask, addr, len)) {
+			slice_dbg(" fits potential !\n");
+			goto convert;
+		}
 	}
 
 	/* If we have MAP_FIXED and failed the above steps, then error out */
@@ -829,13 +834,12 @@ void slice_set_range_psize(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
 int is_hugepage_only_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
 			   unsigned long len)
 {
-	struct slice_mask mask, available;
+	struct slice_mask available;
 	unsigned int psize = mm->context.user_psize;
 
 	if (radix_enabled())
 		return 0;
 
-	slice_range_to_mask(addr, len, &mask);
 	available = *slice_mask_for_size(mm, psize);
 #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES
 	/* We need to account for 4k slices too */
@@ -852,6 +856,6 @@ int is_hugepage_only_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
 	slice_print_mask(" mask", &mask);
 	slice_print_mask(" available", &available);
 #endif
-	return !slice_check_fit(mm, &mask, &available);
+	return !slice_check_range_fits(mm, &available, addr, len);
 }
 #endif
-- 
2.13.3

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-02-12 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-12 18:12 [RFC REBASED 1/5] powerpc/mm/slice: pass pointers to struct slice_mask where possible Christophe Leroy
2018-02-12 18:12 ` [RFC REBASED 2/5] powerpc/mm/slice: implement a slice mask cache Christophe Leroy
2018-02-12 18:12 ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2018-02-27  7:20   ` [RFC REBASED 3/5] powerpc/mm/slice: implement slice_check_range_fits Aneesh Kumar K.V
2018-02-27  9:04     ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-02-12 18:12 ` [RFC REBASED 4/5] powerpc/mm/slice: Use const pointers to cached slice masks where possible Christophe Leroy
2018-02-27  7:29   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2018-02-27  9:08     ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-02-12 18:12 ` [RFC REBASED 5/5] powerpc/mm/slice: use the dynamic high slice size to limit bitmap operations Christophe Leroy
2018-02-27  9:01   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2018-02-27  9:11     ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-02-27 12:41       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2018-02-28  6:53         ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-02-28  6:59           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2018-03-01  7:09           ` Christophe LEROY
2018-03-01  9:22             ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-02-28  7:07   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
     [not found] ` <87muzu7w58.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-02-27  7:04   ` [RFC REBASED 1/5] powerpc/mm/slice: pass pointers to struct slice_mask where possible Christophe LEROY

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=caa9d52e0a8ef15719bafe8002a4ad2dc359c634.1518382747.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
    --to=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.