From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michal Simek Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 08:58:57 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Kconfig: Move option CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH to Kconfig In-Reply-To: <20160721191413.GI1623@bill-the-cat> References: <1468905142-12539-1-git-send-email-sivadur@xilinx.com> <9f8d48d8-744f-ab33-e6a7-ff264cdbc7e1@xilinx.com> <20160721144624.GD1623@bill-the-cat> <20160721191413.GI1623@bill-the-cat> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 21.7.2016 21:14, Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:58:18PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote: >> On 21.7.2016 16:46, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 01:51:20PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote: >>>> Hi Tom, >>>> >>>> On 19.7.2016 07:12, Siva Durga Prasad Paladugu wrote: >>>>> Move config option CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH as Kconfig >>>>> option. All the boards which needs to enable this >>>>> option can be done through defconfigs >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Siva Durga Prasad Paladugu >>>>> --- >>>>> Changes for v2: >>>>> - No changes >>>>> --- >>>>> common/Kconfig | 6 ++++++ >>>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/common/Kconfig b/common/Kconfig >>>>> index 8adc821..46e7173 100644 >>>>> --- a/common/Kconfig >>>>> +++ b/common/Kconfig >>>>> @@ -197,3 +197,9 @@ config CONSOLE_RECORD_IN_SIZE >>>>> tstc() and getc() will use this in preference to real device input. >>>>> The buffer is allocated immediately after the malloc() region is >>>>> ready. >>>>> + >>>>> +config SYS_NO_FLASH >>>>> + bool "Disable support for parallel NOR flash" >>>>> + default n >>>>> + help >>>>> + This option is used to disable support for parallel NOR flash. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Do you want to take this patch to your tree? >>>> Or should I take it to my tree with others patches which remove this >>>> option for zynq boards? >>> >>> Is it blocking other changes? If no, I'll grab it probably post -rc2 >>> and migrate all config files, if yes, um, if we can grab this now and >>> migrate later without adding a ton of warnings, we can go that way. >> >> >> There are 2 follow up patches which depends on this one. >> >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2016-July/260970.html >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2016-July/260972.html >> >> The point here that they are removing board files for 4 boards. But if >> you want to do it after rc2 I am fine with it. > > Go ahead and bring it all in your tree (and build a bunch of arm) and if > it looks OK there, I'll take it now. Thanks! > ok. Applied to xilinx tree. Thanks, Michal