From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B72BC11F65 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 18:22:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D8ED61C7C for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 18:22:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236379AbhF1SYN (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2021 14:24:13 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:39362 "EHLO mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234751AbhF1SX3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2021 14:23:29 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 15SI3tDM064448; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 14:21:00 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=dc/S/1/PMhO2CDdPI1HX9wC2D1Doj3jFVx5qGJjnfU0=; b=Tj6jg/mh1Lg8RbDAydWKw6JMFoZhRFKg/7ugV5R+AzV2wxu9fWqgAK+R4Pz+Hz4Ieg62 cMVeZVN7ssu/ZXy3OvwZkSWW0Kln/OuF7tWu+JGvaiwkpTOz9yYRYx02ebvvHXeF7lia vQa074cyrdff0+496b7Uik9agjcyetkY76FzIaVL3OpbjZ+1BJCBejQNqCT1/WTIsufk 7X1fHP5MA/f0kuAL7QfM0AXAw/QuW49ywoIHVUPQ2SWhQmd3f7r8c8vWYBsJuzJqcyAA +kTKSmVyxdM5gd3Ksa9XlC8j/2hyzWcmPCPp8kwRUOgFRMnGeUtVux3+UxAnuw1I2UiM Bw== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 39fjn99q4a-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 28 Jun 2021 14:21:00 -0400 Received: from m0098417.ppops.net (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 15SI4xTi072144; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 14:21:00 -0400 Received: from ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com (fd.55.37a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.55.85.253]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 39fjn99q41-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 28 Jun 2021 14:21:00 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 15SIAUXj015727; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 18:20:59 GMT Received: from b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.17]) by ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 39ejyx3tp8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 28 Jun 2021 18:20:59 +0000 Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.235]) by b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 15SIKwcl29360432 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 28 Jun 2021 18:20:58 GMT Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2322078064; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 18:20:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBB2A780B4; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 18:20:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cpe-172-100-179-72.stny.res.rr.com (unknown [9.85.148.87]) by b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 18:20:56 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/vfio-ap: do not use open locks during VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM notification To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jjherne@linux.ibm.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com References: <20210625220758.80365-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> <20210628173448.GG4459@nvidia.com> From: Tony Krowiak Message-ID: Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 14:20:55 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210628173448.GG4459@nvidia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: hNTyB1T5iBMZMzJMtrOAOcJXFWvBdtCu X-Proofpoint-GUID: BJjxR1E-k7zVg-Ci6nEbnT0iBTQAFzEQ X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391,18.0.790 definitions=2021-06-28_14:2021-06-25,2021-06-28 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104190000 definitions=main-2106280118 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/28/21 1:34 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 06:07:58PM -0400, Tony Krowiak wrote: >> static void vfio_ap_mdev_unset_kvm(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev) >> { >> + mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock); >> >> + if ((matrix_mdev->kvm) && (matrix_mdev->kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd)) { >> mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock); >> + down_write(&matrix_mdev->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook_rwsem); >> + matrix_mdev->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook = NULL; >> + up_write(&matrix_mdev->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook_rwsem); >> >> + kvm_arch_crypto_clear_masks(matrix_mdev->kvm); >> >> mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock); >> vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queues(matrix_mdev->mdev); >> kvm_put_kvm(matrix_mdev->kvm); >> matrix_mdev->kvm = NULL; >> + mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock); >> } > Doesn't a flow exit the function with matrix_dev->lock held he How can that happen? What flow? > > Write it with 'success oriented flow' I'm not sure what you mean, can you clarify this statement? > > I didn't check if everything makes sense, but it sure looks clean. > > Jason