From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anatoly Burakov Subject: [PATCH 3/8] mem: raise maximum fd limit unconditionally Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 17:59:50 +0100 Message-ID: References: Cc: tiwei.bie@intel.com, ray.kinsella@intel.com, zhihong.wang@intel.com, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, kuralamudhan.ramakrishnan@intel.com To: dev@dpdk.org Return-path: Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56ED493D for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 19:00:08 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: References: List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Previously, when we allocated hugepages, we closed the fd's corresponding to them after we've done our mappings. Since we did mmap(), we didn't actually lose the reference, but file descriptors used for mmap() do not count against the fd limit. Since we are going to store all of our fd's, we will hit the fd limit much more often when using smaller page sizes. Fix this to raise the fd limit to maximum unconditionally. Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov --- lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c index dbf19499e..dfb537f59 100644 --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -2204,6 +2205,25 @@ memseg_secondary_init(void) int rte_eal_memseg_init(void) { + /* increase rlimit to maximum */ + struct rlimit lim; + + if (getrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE, &lim) == 0) { + /* set limit to maximum */ + lim.rlim_cur = lim.rlim_max; + + if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE, &lim) < 0) { + RTE_LOG(DEBUG, EAL, "Setting maximum number of open files failed: %s\n", + strerror(errno)); + } else { + RTE_LOG(DEBUG, EAL, "Setting maximum number of open files to %" + PRIu64 "\n", + (uint64_t)lim.rlim_cur); + } + } else { + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Cannot get current resource limits\n"); + } + return rte_eal_process_type() == RTE_PROC_PRIMARY ? #ifndef RTE_ARCH_64 memseg_primary_init_32() : -- 2.17.1