All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
	io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] forbid fix {SQ,IO}POLL
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 13:52:10 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cc3197f9-e8b1-ac13-c121-291bb32646e3@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d1d92d99-c6b1-fc6e-ea1d-6c2e5097d83f@gmail.com>

On 6/4/20 1:22 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 04/06/2020 20:06, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 6/3/20 12:51 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 6/3/20 9:03 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>>> The first one adds checks {SQPOLL,IOPOLL}. IOPOLL check can be
>>>> moved in the common path later, or rethinked entirely, e.g.
>>>> not io_iopoll_req_issued()'ed for unsupported opcodes.
>>>>
>>>> 3 others are just cleanups on top.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> v2: add IOPOLL to the whole bunch of opcodes in [1/4].
>>>>     dirty and effective.
>>>> v3: sent wrong set in v2, re-sending right one 
>>>>
>>>> Pavel Begunkov (4):
>>>>   io_uring: fix {SQ,IO}POLL with unsupported opcodes
>>>>   io_uring: do build_open_how() only once
>>>>   io_uring: deduplicate io_openat{,2}_prep()
>>>>   io_uring: move send/recv IOPOLL check into prep
>>>>
>>>>  fs/io_uring.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
>>>>  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Thanks, applied.
>>
>> #1 goes too far, provide/remove buffers is fine with iopoll. I'll
>> going to edit the patch.
> 
> Conceptually it should work, but from a quick look:
> 
> - io_provide_buffers() drops a ref from req->refs, which should've
> been used by iopoll*. E.g. io_complete_rw_iopoll() doesn't do that.
> 
> - it doesn't set REQ_F_IOPOLL_COMPLETED, thus iopoll* side will
> call req->file->iopoll().

We don't poll for provide/remove buffers, or file update. The
completion is done inline. The REQ_F_IOPOLL_COMPLETED and friends
is only applicable on read/writes.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-04 19:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-03 15:03 [PATCH v3 0/4] forbid fix {SQ,IO}POLL Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-03 15:03 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] io_uring: fix {SQ,IO}POLL with unsupported opcodes Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-03 15:03 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] io_uring: do build_open_how() only once Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-03 15:03 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] io_uring: deduplicate io_openat{,2}_prep() Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-03 15:03 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] io_uring: move send/recv IOPOLL check into prep Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-03 15:14 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] forbid fix {SQ,IO}POLL Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-03 18:51 ` Jens Axboe
2020-06-04 17:06   ` Jens Axboe
2020-06-04 19:22     ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-04 19:52       ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2020-06-04 20:12         ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-04 20:17           ` Jens Axboe
2020-06-04 20:25             ` Pavel Begunkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cc3197f9-e8b1-ac13-c121-291bb32646e3@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.