[PATCH 0/8] MMC-core: Fine-tuning for some function implementations

[PATCH 0/8] MMC-core: Fine-tuning for some function implementations

[SF Markus Elfring]

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 22:30:03 +0100

Some update suggestions were taken into account
from static source code analysis.

Markus Elfring (8):
  Use kmalloc_array() in mmc_test_area_init()
  Fix a typo in a comment line
  Use seq_puts() in mtf_testlist_show()
  mmc_test: Add some spaces for better code readability
  mmc_test: Combine substrings for 5 messages
  mmc_test: Improve a size determination in five functions
  Use kcalloc() in mmc_test_alloc_mem()
  Use kmalloc_array() in mmc_alloc_sg()

 drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 drivers/mmc/core/queue.c    |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

-- 
2.11.0

[PATCH 0/8] MMC-core: Fine-tuning for some function implementations

[SF Markus Elfring]

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 22:30:03 +0100

Some update suggestions were taken into account
from static source code analysis.

Markus Elfring (8):
  Use kmalloc_array() in mmc_test_area_init()
  Fix a typo in a comment line
  Use seq_puts() in mtf_testlist_show()
  mmc_test: Add some spaces for better code readability
  mmc_test: Combine substrings for 5 messages
  mmc_test: Improve a size determination in five functions
  Use kcalloc() in mmc_test_alloc_mem()
  Use kmalloc_array() in mmc_alloc_sg()

 drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 drivers/mmc/core/queue.c    |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

-- 
2.11.0

[PATCH 1/8] mmc-core: Use kmalloc_array() in mmc_test_area_init()

[SF Markus Elfring]

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 18:44:26 +0100

* A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
  indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
  Thus use the corresponding function "kmalloc_array".

  This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

* Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
  to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
  the Linux coding style convention.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
index 3ab6e52d106c..e85ef503d7ce 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
@@ -1579,7 +1579,7 @@ static int mmc_test_area_init(struct mmc_test_card *test, int erase, int fill)
 	if (!t->mem)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	t->sg = kmalloc(sizeof(struct scatterlist) * t->max_segs, GFP_KERNEL);
+	t->sg = kmalloc_array(t->max_segs, sizeof(*t->sg), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!t->sg) {
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
 		goto out_free;
-- 
2.11.0

[PATCH 1/8] mmc-core: Use kmalloc_array() in mmc_test_area_init()

[SF Markus Elfring]

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 18:44:26 +0100

* A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
  indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
  Thus use the corresponding function "kmalloc_array".

  This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

* Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
  to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
  the Linux coding style convention.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
index 3ab6e52d106c..e85ef503d7ce 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
@@ -1579,7 +1579,7 @@ static int mmc_test_area_init(struct mmc_test_card *test, int erase, int fill)
 	if (!t->mem)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	t->sg = kmalloc(sizeof(struct scatterlist) * t->max_segs, GFP_KERNEL);
+	t->sg = kmalloc_array(t->max_segs, sizeof(*t->sg), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!t->sg) {
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
 		goto out_free;
-- 
2.11.0

[PATCH 2/8] mmc-core: Fix a typo in a comment line

[SF Markus Elfring]

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 19:05:37 +0100

Add a missing character in the function description.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
index e85ef503d7ce..2f838a13a904 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
@@ -1533,7 +1533,7 @@ static int mmc_test_area_cleanup(struct mmc_test_card *test)
 
 /*
  * Initialize an area for testing large transfers.  The test area is set to the
- * middle of the card because cards may have different charateristics at the
+ * middle of the card because cards may have different characteristics at the
  * front (for FAT file system optimization).  Optionally, the area is erased
  * (if the card supports it) which may improve write performance.  Optionally,
  * the area is filled with data for subsequent read tests.
-- 
2.11.0

[PATCH 2/8] mmc-core: Fix a typo in a comment line

[SF Markus Elfring]

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 19:05:37 +0100

Add a missing character in the function description.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
index e85ef503d7ce..2f838a13a904 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
@@ -1533,7 +1533,7 @@ static int mmc_test_area_cleanup(struct mmc_test_card *test)
 
 /*
  * Initialize an area for testing large transfers.  The test area is set to the
- * middle of the card because cards may have different charateristics at the
+ * middle of the card because cards may have different characteristics at the
  * front (for FAT file system optimization).  Optionally, the area is erased
  * (if the card supports it) which may improve write performance.  Optionally,
  * the area is filled with data for subsequent read tests.
-- 
2.11.0

[PATCH 3/8] mmc-core: Use seq_puts() in mtf_testlist_show()

[SF Markus Elfring]

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 19:48:28 +0100

The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.

WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf

Thus fix the affected source code place.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
index 2f838a13a904..848f4f30e343 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
@@ -3163,7 +3163,7 @@ static int mtf_testlist_show(struct seq_file *sf, void *data)
 
 	mutex_lock(&mmc_test_lock);
 
-	seq_printf(sf, "0:\tRun all tests\n");
+	seq_puts(sf, "0:\tRun all tests\n");
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mmc_test_cases); i++)
 		seq_printf(sf, "%d:\t%s\n", i+1, mmc_test_cases[i].name);
 
-- 
2.11.0

[PATCH 3/8] mmc-core: Use seq_puts() in mtf_testlist_show()

[SF Markus Elfring]

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 19:48:28 +0100

The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.

WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf

Thus fix the affected source code place.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
index 2f838a13a904..848f4f30e343 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
@@ -3163,7 +3163,7 @@ static int mtf_testlist_show(struct seq_file *sf, void *data)
 
 	mutex_lock(&mmc_test_lock);
 
-	seq_printf(sf, "0:\tRun all tests\n");
+	seq_puts(sf, "0:\tRun all tests\n");
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mmc_test_cases); i++)
 		seq_printf(sf, "%d:\t%s\n", i+1, mmc_test_cases[i].name);
 
-- 
2.11.0

[PATCH 4/8] mmc/core/mmc_test: Add some spaces for better code readability

[SF Markus Elfring]

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 20:25:39 +0100

Use space characters at some source code places according to
the Linux coding style convention.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
index 848f4f30e343..42aefd3df09b 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
@@ -641,11 +641,11 @@ static int __mmc_test_prepare(struct mmc_test_card *test, int write)
 	if (write)
 		memset(test->buffer, 0xDF, 512);
 	else {
-		for (i = 0;i < 512;i++)
+		for (i = 0; i < 512; i++)
 			test->buffer[i] = i;
 	}
 
-	for (i = 0;i < BUFFER_SIZE / 512;i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < BUFFER_SIZE / 512; i++) {
 		ret = mmc_test_buffer_transfer(test, test->buffer, i, 512, 1);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
@@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ static int mmc_test_cleanup(struct mmc_test_card *test)
 
 	memset(test->buffer, 0, 512);
 
-	for (i = 0;i < BUFFER_SIZE / 512;i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < BUFFER_SIZE / 512; i++) {
 		ret = mmc_test_buffer_transfer(test, test->buffer, i, 512, 1);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
@@ -946,7 +946,7 @@ static int mmc_test_transfer(struct mmc_test_card *test,
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	if (write) {
-		for (i = 0;i < blocks * blksz;i++)
+		for (i = 0; i < blocks * blksz; i++)
 			test->scratch[i] = i;
 	} else {
 		memset(test->scratch, 0, BUFFER_SIZE);
@@ -980,7 +980,7 @@ static int mmc_test_transfer(struct mmc_test_card *test,
 
 		memset(test->buffer, 0, sectors * 512);
 
-		for (i = 0;i < sectors;i++) {
+		for (i = 0; i < sectors; i++) {
 			ret = mmc_test_buffer_transfer(test,
 				test->buffer + i * 512,
 				dev_addr + i, 512, 0);
@@ -988,12 +988,12 @@ static int mmc_test_transfer(struct mmc_test_card *test,
 				return ret;
 		}
 
-		for (i = 0;i < blocks * blksz;i++) {
+		for (i = 0; i < blocks * blksz; i++) {
 			if (test->buffer[i] != (u8)i)
 				return RESULT_FAIL;
 		}
 
-		for (;i < sectors * 512;i++) {
+		for (; i < sectors * 512; i++) {
 			if (test->buffer[i] != 0xDF)
 				return RESULT_FAIL;
 		}
@@ -1001,7 +1001,7 @@ static int mmc_test_transfer(struct mmc_test_card *test,
 		local_irq_save(flags);
 		sg_copy_to_buffer(sg, sg_len, test->scratch, BUFFER_SIZE);
 		local_irq_restore(flags);
-		for (i = 0;i < blocks * blksz;i++) {
+		for (i = 0; i < blocks * blksz; i++) {
 			if (test->scratch[i] != (u8)i)
 				return RESULT_FAIL;
 		}
@@ -1086,7 +1086,7 @@ static int mmc_test_multi_write(struct mmc_test_card *test)
 
 	sg_init_one(&sg, test->buffer, size);
 
-	return mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size/512, 512, 1);
+	return mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size / 512, 512, 1);
 }
 
 static int mmc_test_multi_read(struct mmc_test_card *test)
@@ -1107,7 +1107,7 @@ static int mmc_test_multi_read(struct mmc_test_card *test)
 
 	sg_init_one(&sg, test->buffer, size);
 
-	return mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size/512, 512, 0);
+	return mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size / 512, 512, 0);
 }
 
 static int mmc_test_pow2_write(struct mmc_test_card *test)
@@ -1118,7 +1118,7 @@ static int mmc_test_pow2_write(struct mmc_test_card *test)
 	if (!test->card->csd.write_partial)
 		return RESULT_UNSUP_CARD;
 
-	for (i = 1; i < 512;i <<= 1) {
+	for (i = 1; i < 512; i <<= 1) {
 		sg_init_one(&sg, test->buffer, i);
 		ret = mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, 1, i, 1);
 		if (ret)
@@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ static int mmc_test_pow2_read(struct mmc_test_card *test)
 	if (!test->card->csd.read_partial)
 		return RESULT_UNSUP_CARD;
 
-	for (i = 1; i < 512;i <<= 1) {
+	for (i = 1; i < 512; i <<= 1) {
 		sg_init_one(&sg, test->buffer, i);
 		ret = mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, 1, i, 0);
 		if (ret)
@@ -1154,7 +1154,7 @@ static int mmc_test_weird_write(struct mmc_test_card *test)
 	if (!test->card->csd.write_partial)
 		return RESULT_UNSUP_CARD;
 
-	for (i = 3; i < 512;i += 7) {
+	for (i = 3; i < 512; i += 7) {
 		sg_init_one(&sg, test->buffer, i);
 		ret = mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, 1, i, 1);
 		if (ret)
@@ -1172,7 +1172,7 @@ static int mmc_test_weird_read(struct mmc_test_card *test)
 	if (!test->card->csd.read_partial)
 		return RESULT_UNSUP_CARD;
 
-	for (i = 3; i < 512;i += 7) {
+	for (i = 3; i < 512; i += 7) {
 		sg_init_one(&sg, test->buffer, i);
 		ret = mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, 1, i, 0);
 		if (ret)
@@ -1231,7 +1231,7 @@ static int mmc_test_align_multi_write(struct mmc_test_card *test)
 
 	for (i = 1; i < TEST_ALIGN_END; i++) {
 		sg_init_one(&sg, test->buffer + i, size);
-		ret = mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size/512, 512, 1);
+		ret = mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size / 512, 512, 1);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 	}
@@ -1258,7 +1258,7 @@ static int mmc_test_align_multi_read(struct mmc_test_card *test)
 
 	for (i = 1; i < TEST_ALIGN_END; i++) {
 		sg_init_one(&sg, test->buffer + i, size);
-		ret = mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size/512, 512, 0);
+		ret = mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size / 512, 512, 0);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 	}
@@ -1357,7 +1357,7 @@ static int mmc_test_multi_write_high(struct mmc_test_card *test)
 	sg_init_table(&sg, 1);
 	sg_set_page(&sg, test->highmem, size, 0);
 
-	return mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size/512, 512, 1);
+	return mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size / 512, 512, 1);
 }
 
 static int mmc_test_multi_read_high(struct mmc_test_card *test)
@@ -1379,7 +1379,7 @@ static int mmc_test_multi_read_high(struct mmc_test_card *test)
 	sg_init_table(&sg, 1);
 	sg_set_page(&sg, test->highmem, size, 0);
 
-	return mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size/512, 512, 0);
+	return mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size / 512, 512, 0);
 }
 
 #else
@@ -2147,7 +2147,7 @@ static int mmc_test_rw_multiple_sg_len(struct mmc_test_card *test,
 	int i;
 
 	for (i = 0 ; i < rw->len && ret == 0; i++) {
-		ret = mmc_test_rw_multiple(test, rw, 512*1024, rw->size,
+		ret = mmc_test_rw_multiple(test, rw, 512 * 1024, rw->size,
 					   rw->sg_len[i]);
 		if (ret)
 			break;
@@ -2954,7 +2954,7 @@ static void mmc_test_run(struct mmc_test_card *test, int testcase)
 
 	mmc_claim_host(test->card->host);
 
-	for (i = 0;i < ARRAY_SIZE(mmc_test_cases);i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mmc_test_cases); i++) {
 		struct mmc_test_general_result *gr;
 
 		if (testcase && ((i + 1) != testcase))
@@ -3165,7 +3165,7 @@ static int mtf_testlist_show(struct seq_file *sf, void *data)
 
 	seq_puts(sf, "0:\tRun all tests\n");
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mmc_test_cases); i++)
-		seq_printf(sf, "%d:\t%s\n", i+1, mmc_test_cases[i].name);
+		seq_printf(sf, "%d:\t%s\n", i + 1, mmc_test_cases[i].name);
 
 	mutex_unlock(&mmc_test_lock);
 
-- 
2.11.0

[PATCH 4/8] mmc/core/mmc_test: Add some spaces for better code readability

[SF Markus Elfring]

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 20:25:39 +0100

Use space characters at some source code places according to
the Linux coding style convention.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
index 848f4f30e343..42aefd3df09b 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
@@ -641,11 +641,11 @@ static int __mmc_test_prepare(struct mmc_test_card *test, int write)
 	if (write)
 		memset(test->buffer, 0xDF, 512);
 	else {
-		for (i = 0;i < 512;i++)
+		for (i = 0; i < 512; i++)
 			test->buffer[i] = i;
 	}
 
-	for (i = 0;i < BUFFER_SIZE / 512;i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < BUFFER_SIZE / 512; i++) {
 		ret = mmc_test_buffer_transfer(test, test->buffer, i, 512, 1);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
@@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ static int mmc_test_cleanup(struct mmc_test_card *test)
 
 	memset(test->buffer, 0, 512);
 
-	for (i = 0;i < BUFFER_SIZE / 512;i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < BUFFER_SIZE / 512; i++) {
 		ret = mmc_test_buffer_transfer(test, test->buffer, i, 512, 1);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
@@ -946,7 +946,7 @@ static int mmc_test_transfer(struct mmc_test_card *test,
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	if (write) {
-		for (i = 0;i < blocks * blksz;i++)
+		for (i = 0; i < blocks * blksz; i++)
 			test->scratch[i] = i;
 	} else {
 		memset(test->scratch, 0, BUFFER_SIZE);
@@ -980,7 +980,7 @@ static int mmc_test_transfer(struct mmc_test_card *test,
 
 		memset(test->buffer, 0, sectors * 512);
 
-		for (i = 0;i < sectors;i++) {
+		for (i = 0; i < sectors; i++) {
 			ret = mmc_test_buffer_transfer(test,
 				test->buffer + i * 512,
 				dev_addr + i, 512, 0);
@@ -988,12 +988,12 @@ static int mmc_test_transfer(struct mmc_test_card *test,
 				return ret;
 		}
 
-		for (i = 0;i < blocks * blksz;i++) {
+		for (i = 0; i < blocks * blksz; i++) {
 			if (test->buffer[i] != (u8)i)
 				return RESULT_FAIL;
 		}
 
-		for (;i < sectors * 512;i++) {
+		for (; i < sectors * 512; i++) {
 			if (test->buffer[i] != 0xDF)
 				return RESULT_FAIL;
 		}
@@ -1001,7 +1001,7 @@ static int mmc_test_transfer(struct mmc_test_card *test,
 		local_irq_save(flags);
 		sg_copy_to_buffer(sg, sg_len, test->scratch, BUFFER_SIZE);
 		local_irq_restore(flags);
-		for (i = 0;i < blocks * blksz;i++) {
+		for (i = 0; i < blocks * blksz; i++) {
 			if (test->scratch[i] != (u8)i)
 				return RESULT_FAIL;
 		}
@@ -1086,7 +1086,7 @@ static int mmc_test_multi_write(struct mmc_test_card *test)
 
 	sg_init_one(&sg, test->buffer, size);
 
-	return mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size/512, 512, 1);
+	return mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size / 512, 512, 1);
 }
 
 static int mmc_test_multi_read(struct mmc_test_card *test)
@@ -1107,7 +1107,7 @@ static int mmc_test_multi_read(struct mmc_test_card *test)
 
 	sg_init_one(&sg, test->buffer, size);
 
-	return mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size/512, 512, 0);
+	return mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size / 512, 512, 0);
 }
 
 static int mmc_test_pow2_write(struct mmc_test_card *test)
@@ -1118,7 +1118,7 @@ static int mmc_test_pow2_write(struct mmc_test_card *test)
 	if (!test->card->csd.write_partial)
 		return RESULT_UNSUP_CARD;
 
-	for (i = 1; i < 512;i <<= 1) {
+	for (i = 1; i < 512; i <<= 1) {
 		sg_init_one(&sg, test->buffer, i);
 		ret = mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, 1, i, 1);
 		if (ret)
@@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ static int mmc_test_pow2_read(struct mmc_test_card *test)
 	if (!test->card->csd.read_partial)
 		return RESULT_UNSUP_CARD;
 
-	for (i = 1; i < 512;i <<= 1) {
+	for (i = 1; i < 512; i <<= 1) {
 		sg_init_one(&sg, test->buffer, i);
 		ret = mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, 1, i, 0);
 		if (ret)
@@ -1154,7 +1154,7 @@ static int mmc_test_weird_write(struct mmc_test_card *test)
 	if (!test->card->csd.write_partial)
 		return RESULT_UNSUP_CARD;
 
-	for (i = 3; i < 512;i += 7) {
+	for (i = 3; i < 512; i += 7) {
 		sg_init_one(&sg, test->buffer, i);
 		ret = mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, 1, i, 1);
 		if (ret)
@@ -1172,7 +1172,7 @@ static int mmc_test_weird_read(struct mmc_test_card *test)
 	if (!test->card->csd.read_partial)
 		return RESULT_UNSUP_CARD;
 
-	for (i = 3; i < 512;i += 7) {
+	for (i = 3; i < 512; i += 7) {
 		sg_init_one(&sg, test->buffer, i);
 		ret = mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, 1, i, 0);
 		if (ret)
@@ -1231,7 +1231,7 @@ static int mmc_test_align_multi_write(struct mmc_test_card *test)
 
 	for (i = 1; i < TEST_ALIGN_END; i++) {
 		sg_init_one(&sg, test->buffer + i, size);
-		ret = mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size/512, 512, 1);
+		ret = mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size / 512, 512, 1);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 	}
@@ -1258,7 +1258,7 @@ static int mmc_test_align_multi_read(struct mmc_test_card *test)
 
 	for (i = 1; i < TEST_ALIGN_END; i++) {
 		sg_init_one(&sg, test->buffer + i, size);
-		ret = mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size/512, 512, 0);
+		ret = mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size / 512, 512, 0);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 	}
@@ -1357,7 +1357,7 @@ static int mmc_test_multi_write_high(struct mmc_test_card *test)
 	sg_init_table(&sg, 1);
 	sg_set_page(&sg, test->highmem, size, 0);
 
-	return mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size/512, 512, 1);
+	return mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size / 512, 512, 1);
 }
 
 static int mmc_test_multi_read_high(struct mmc_test_card *test)
@@ -1379,7 +1379,7 @@ static int mmc_test_multi_read_high(struct mmc_test_card *test)
 	sg_init_table(&sg, 1);
 	sg_set_page(&sg, test->highmem, size, 0);
 
-	return mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size/512, 512, 0);
+	return mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size / 512, 512, 0);
 }
 
 #else
@@ -2147,7 +2147,7 @@ static int mmc_test_rw_multiple_sg_len(struct mmc_test_card *test,
 	int i;
 
 	for (i = 0 ; i < rw->len && ret = 0; i++) {
-		ret = mmc_test_rw_multiple(test, rw, 512*1024, rw->size,
+		ret = mmc_test_rw_multiple(test, rw, 512 * 1024, rw->size,
 					   rw->sg_len[i]);
 		if (ret)
 			break;
@@ -2954,7 +2954,7 @@ static void mmc_test_run(struct mmc_test_card *test, int testcase)
 
 	mmc_claim_host(test->card->host);
 
-	for (i = 0;i < ARRAY_SIZE(mmc_test_cases);i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mmc_test_cases); i++) {
 		struct mmc_test_general_result *gr;
 
 		if (testcase && ((i + 1) != testcase))
@@ -3165,7 +3165,7 @@ static int mtf_testlist_show(struct seq_file *sf, void *data)
 
 	seq_puts(sf, "0:\tRun all tests\n");
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mmc_test_cases); i++)
-		seq_printf(sf, "%d:\t%s\n", i+1, mmc_test_cases[i].name);
+		seq_printf(sf, "%d:\t%s\n", i + 1, mmc_test_cases[i].name);
 
 	mutex_unlock(&mmc_test_lock);
 
-- 
2.11.0

[PATCH 5/8] mmc/core/mmc_test: Combine substrings for 5 messages

[SF Markus Elfring]

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 20:56:48 +0100

The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.

WARNING: quoted string split across lines

Thus fix affected source code places.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 15 +++++----------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
index 42aefd3df09b..bb9f569a5dd5 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
@@ -277,8 +277,7 @@ static int mmc_test_wait_busy(struct mmc_test_card *test)
 		if (!busy && mmc_test_busy(&cmd)) {
 			busy = 1;
 			if (test->card->host->caps & MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY)
-				pr_info("%s: Warning: Host did not "
-					"wait for busy state to end.\n",
+				pr_info("%s: Warning: Host did not wait for busy state to end.\n",
 					mmc_hostname(test->card->host));
 		}
 	} while (mmc_test_busy(&cmd));
@@ -2967,8 +2966,7 @@ static void mmc_test_run(struct mmc_test_card *test, int testcase)
 		if (mmc_test_cases[i].prepare) {
 			ret = mmc_test_cases[i].prepare(test);
 			if (ret) {
-				pr_info("%s: Result: Prepare "
-					"stage failed! (%d)\n",
+				pr_info("%s: Result: Prepare stage failed! (%d)\n",
 					mmc_hostname(test->card->host),
 					ret);
 				continue;
@@ -3005,13 +3003,11 @@ static void mmc_test_run(struct mmc_test_card *test, int testcase)
 				mmc_hostname(test->card->host));
 			break;
 		case RESULT_UNSUP_HOST:
-			pr_info("%s: Result: UNSUPPORTED "
-				"(by host)\n",
+			pr_info("%s: Result: UNSUPPORTED (by host)\n",
 				mmc_hostname(test->card->host));
 			break;
 		case RESULT_UNSUP_CARD:
-			pr_info("%s: Result: UNSUPPORTED "
-				"(by card)\n",
+			pr_info("%s: Result: UNSUPPORTED (by card)\n",
 				mmc_hostname(test->card->host));
 			break;
 		default:
@@ -3026,8 +3022,7 @@ static void mmc_test_run(struct mmc_test_card *test, int testcase)
 		if (mmc_test_cases[i].cleanup) {
 			ret = mmc_test_cases[i].cleanup(test);
 			if (ret) {
-				pr_info("%s: Warning: Cleanup "
-					"stage failed! (%d)\n",
+				pr_info("%s: Warning: Cleanup stage failed! (%d)\n",
 					mmc_hostname(test->card->host),
 					ret);
 			}
-- 
2.11.0

[PATCH 5/8] mmc/core/mmc_test: Combine substrings for 5 messages

[SF Markus Elfring]

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 20:56:48 +0100

The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.

WARNING: quoted string split across lines

Thus fix affected source code places.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 15 +++++----------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
index 42aefd3df09b..bb9f569a5dd5 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
@@ -277,8 +277,7 @@ static int mmc_test_wait_busy(struct mmc_test_card *test)
 		if (!busy && mmc_test_busy(&cmd)) {
 			busy = 1;
 			if (test->card->host->caps & MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY)
-				pr_info("%s: Warning: Host did not "
-					"wait for busy state to end.\n",
+				pr_info("%s: Warning: Host did not wait for busy state to end.\n",
 					mmc_hostname(test->card->host));
 		}
 	} while (mmc_test_busy(&cmd));
@@ -2967,8 +2966,7 @@ static void mmc_test_run(struct mmc_test_card *test, int testcase)
 		if (mmc_test_cases[i].prepare) {
 			ret = mmc_test_cases[i].prepare(test);
 			if (ret) {
-				pr_info("%s: Result: Prepare "
-					"stage failed! (%d)\n",
+				pr_info("%s: Result: Prepare stage failed! (%d)\n",
 					mmc_hostname(test->card->host),
 					ret);
 				continue;
@@ -3005,13 +3003,11 @@ static void mmc_test_run(struct mmc_test_card *test, int testcase)
 				mmc_hostname(test->card->host));
 			break;
 		case RESULT_UNSUP_HOST:
-			pr_info("%s: Result: UNSUPPORTED "
-				"(by host)\n",
+			pr_info("%s: Result: UNSUPPORTED (by host)\n",
 				mmc_hostname(test->card->host));
 			break;
 		case RESULT_UNSUP_CARD:
-			pr_info("%s: Result: UNSUPPORTED "
-				"(by card)\n",
+			pr_info("%s: Result: UNSUPPORTED (by card)\n",
 				mmc_hostname(test->card->host));
 			break;
 		default:
@@ -3026,8 +3022,7 @@ static void mmc_test_run(struct mmc_test_card *test, int testcase)
 		if (mmc_test_cases[i].cleanup) {
 			ret = mmc_test_cases[i].cleanup(test);
 			if (ret) {
-				pr_info("%s: Warning: Cleanup "
-					"stage failed! (%d)\n",
+				pr_info("%s: Warning: Cleanup stage failed! (%d)\n",
 					mmc_hostname(test->card->host),
 					ret);
 			}
-- 
2.11.0

[PATCH 6/8] mmc/core/mmc_test: Improve a size determination in five functions

[SF Markus Elfring]

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 21:25:44 +0100

Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
as the parameter for the operator "sizeof" to make the corresponding size
determination a bit safer according to the Linux coding style convention.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 11 +++++------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
index bb9f569a5dd5..294d3c675734 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
@@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ static struct mmc_test_mem *mmc_test_alloc_mem(unsigned long min_sz,
 	if (max_segs > max_page_cnt)
 		max_segs = max_page_cnt;
 
-	mem = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mmc_test_mem), GFP_KERNEL);
+	mem = kzalloc(sizeof(*mem), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!mem)
 		return NULL;
 
@@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ static void mmc_test_save_transfer_result(struct mmc_test_card *test,
 	if (!test->gr)
 		return;
 
-	tr = kmalloc(sizeof(struct mmc_test_transfer_result), GFP_KERNEL);
+	tr = kmalloc(sizeof(*tr), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!tr)
 		return;
 
@@ -2973,8 +2973,7 @@ static void mmc_test_run(struct mmc_test_card *test, int testcase)
 			}
 		}
 
-		gr = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mmc_test_general_result),
-			GFP_KERNEL);
+		gr = kzalloc(sizeof(*gr), GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (gr) {
 			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&gr->tr_lst);
 
@@ -3108,7 +3107,7 @@ static ssize_t mtf_test_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	test = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mmc_test_card), GFP_KERNEL);
+	test = kzalloc(sizeof(*test), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!test)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
@@ -3213,7 +3212,7 @@ static int __mmc_test_register_dbgfs_file(struct mmc_card *card,
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
-	df = kmalloc(sizeof(struct mmc_test_dbgfs_file), GFP_KERNEL);
+	df = kmalloc(sizeof(*df), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!df) {
 		debugfs_remove(file);
 		dev_err(&card->dev,
-- 
2.11.0

[PATCH 6/8] mmc/core/mmc_test: Improve a size determination in five functions

[SF Markus Elfring]

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 21:25:44 +0100

Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
as the parameter for the operator "sizeof" to make the corresponding size
determination a bit safer according to the Linux coding style convention.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 11 +++++------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
index bb9f569a5dd5..294d3c675734 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
@@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ static struct mmc_test_mem *mmc_test_alloc_mem(unsigned long min_sz,
 	if (max_segs > max_page_cnt)
 		max_segs = max_page_cnt;
 
-	mem = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mmc_test_mem), GFP_KERNEL);
+	mem = kzalloc(sizeof(*mem), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!mem)
 		return NULL;
 
@@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ static void mmc_test_save_transfer_result(struct mmc_test_card *test,
 	if (!test->gr)
 		return;
 
-	tr = kmalloc(sizeof(struct mmc_test_transfer_result), GFP_KERNEL);
+	tr = kmalloc(sizeof(*tr), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!tr)
 		return;
 
@@ -2973,8 +2973,7 @@ static void mmc_test_run(struct mmc_test_card *test, int testcase)
 			}
 		}
 
-		gr = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mmc_test_general_result),
-			GFP_KERNEL);
+		gr = kzalloc(sizeof(*gr), GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (gr) {
 			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&gr->tr_lst);
 
@@ -3108,7 +3107,7 @@ static ssize_t mtf_test_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	test = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mmc_test_card), GFP_KERNEL);
+	test = kzalloc(sizeof(*test), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!test)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
@@ -3213,7 +3212,7 @@ static int __mmc_test_register_dbgfs_file(struct mmc_card *card,
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
-	df = kmalloc(sizeof(struct mmc_test_dbgfs_file), GFP_KERNEL);
+	df = kmalloc(sizeof(*df), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!df) {
 		debugfs_remove(file);
 		dev_err(&card->dev,
-- 
2.11.0

[PATCH 7/8] mmc-core: Use kcalloc() in mmc_test_alloc_mem()

[SF Markus Elfring]

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 21:43:12 +0100

* The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.

  WARNING: Prefer kcalloc over kzalloc with multiply

  Thus fix the affected source code place.

* Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
  to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
  the Linux coding style convention.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
index 294d3c675734..cb4750de2720 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
@@ -360,8 +360,7 @@ static struct mmc_test_mem *mmc_test_alloc_mem(unsigned long min_sz,
 	if (!mem)
 		return NULL;
 
-	mem->arr = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mmc_test_pages) * max_segs,
-			   GFP_KERNEL);
+	mem->arr = kcalloc(max_segs, sizeof(*mem->arr), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!mem->arr)
 		goto out_free;
 
-- 
2.11.0

[PATCH 7/8] mmc-core: Use kcalloc() in mmc_test_alloc_mem()

[SF Markus Elfring]

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 21:43:12 +0100

* The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.

  WARNING: Prefer kcalloc over kzalloc with multiply

  Thus fix the affected source code place.

* Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
  to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
  the Linux coding style convention.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
index 294d3c675734..cb4750de2720 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
@@ -360,8 +360,7 @@ static struct mmc_test_mem *mmc_test_alloc_mem(unsigned long min_sz,
 	if (!mem)
 		return NULL;
 
-	mem->arr = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mmc_test_pages) * max_segs,
-			   GFP_KERNEL);
+	mem->arr = kcalloc(max_segs, sizeof(*mem->arr), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!mem->arr)
 		goto out_free;
 
-- 
2.11.0

[PATCH 8/8] mmc-core: Use kmalloc_array() in mmc_alloc_sg()

[SF Markus Elfring]

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 22:10:40 +0100

* A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
  indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
  Thus use the corresponding function "kmalloc_array".

  This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

* Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
  to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
  the Linux coding style convention.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 drivers/mmc/core/queue.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c b/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c
index a6496d8027bc..b1986622c60e 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static struct scatterlist *mmc_alloc_sg(int sg_len, int *err)
 {
 	struct scatterlist *sg;
 
-	sg = kmalloc(sizeof(struct scatterlist)*sg_len, GFP_KERNEL);
+	sg = kmalloc_array(sg_len, sizeof(*sg), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!sg)
 		*err = -ENOMEM;
 	else {
-- 
2.11.0

[PATCH 8/8] mmc-core: Use kmalloc_array() in mmc_alloc_sg()

[SF Markus Elfring]

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 22:10:40 +0100

* A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
  indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
  Thus use the corresponding function "kmalloc_array".

  This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

* Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
  to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
  the Linux coding style convention.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 drivers/mmc/core/queue.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c b/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c
index a6496d8027bc..b1986622c60e 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static struct scatterlist *mmc_alloc_sg(int sg_len, int *err)
 {
 	struct scatterlist *sg;
 
-	sg = kmalloc(sizeof(struct scatterlist)*sg_len, GFP_KERNEL);
+	sg = kmalloc_array(sg_len, sizeof(*sg), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!sg)
 		*err = -ENOMEM;
 	else {
-- 
2.11.0

Re: [PATCH 1/8] mmc-core: Use kmalloc_array() in mmc_test_area_init()

[Linus Walleij]

On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 10:42 PM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 18:44:26 +0100
>
> * A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
>   indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
>   Thus use the corresponding function "kmalloc_array".
>
>   This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> * Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
>   to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
>   the Linux coding style convention.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>

Chunyan has been running this test code so she might have additional
insights to provide. I am not aware about anyone else really running the
tests, are there people who do it?

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 1/8] mmc-core: Use kmalloc_array() in mmc_test_area_init()

[Linus Walleij]

On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 10:42 PM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 18:44:26 +0100
>
> * A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
>   indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
>   Thus use the corresponding function "kmalloc_array".
>
>   This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> * Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
>   to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
>   the Linux coding style convention.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>

Chunyan has been running this test code so she might have additional
insights to provide. I am not aware about anyone else really running the
tests, are there people who do it?

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 2/8] mmc-core: Fix a typo in a comment line

[Linus Walleij]

On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 10:43 PM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 19:05:37 +0100
>
> Add a missing character in the function description.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 2/8] mmc-core: Fix a typo in a comment line

[Linus Walleij]

On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 10:43 PM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 19:05:37 +0100
>
> Add a missing character in the function description.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 3/8] mmc-core: Use seq_puts() in mtf_testlist_show()

[Linus Walleij]

On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 10:45 PM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 19:48:28 +0100
>
> The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.
>
> WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf
>
> Thus fix the affected source code place.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 3/8] mmc-core: Use seq_puts() in mtf_testlist_show()

[Linus Walleij]

On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 10:45 PM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 19:48:28 +0100
>
> The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.
>
> WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf
>
> Thus fix the affected source code place.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 4/8] mmc/core/mmc_test: Add some spaces for better code readability

[Linus Walleij]

On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 10:46 PM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 20:25:39 +0100
>
> Use space characters at some source code places according to
> the Linux coding style convention.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>

OK then.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 4/8] mmc/core/mmc_test: Add some spaces for better code readability

[Linus Walleij]

On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 10:46 PM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 20:25:39 +0100
>
> Use space characters at some source code places according to
> the Linux coding style convention.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>

OK then.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 5/8] mmc/core/mmc_test: Combine substrings for 5 messages

[Linus Walleij]

On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 10:47 PM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 20:56:48 +0100
>
> The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.
>
> WARNING: quoted string split across lines
>
> Thus fix affected source code places.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 5/8] mmc/core/mmc_test: Combine substrings for 5 messages

[Linus Walleij]

On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 10:47 PM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 20:56:48 +0100
>
> The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.
>
> WARNING: quoted string split across lines
>
> Thus fix affected source code places.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 6/8] mmc/core/mmc_test: Improve a size determination in five functions

[Linus Walleij]

On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 10:49 PM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 21:25:44 +0100
>
> Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
> as the parameter for the operator "sizeof" to make the corresponding size
> determination a bit safer according to the Linux coding style convention.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 6/8] mmc/core/mmc_test: Improve a size determination in five functions

[Linus Walleij]

On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 10:49 PM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 21:25:44 +0100
>
> Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
> as the parameter for the operator "sizeof" to make the corresponding size
> determination a bit safer according to the Linux coding style convention.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 7/8] mmc-core: Use kcalloc() in mmc_test_alloc_mem()

[Linus Walleij]

On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 10:50 PM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 21:43:12 +0100
>
> * The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.
>
>   WARNING: Prefer kcalloc over kzalloc with multiply
>
>   Thus fix the affected source code place.
>
> * Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
>   to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
>   the Linux coding style convention.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 7/8] mmc-core: Use kcalloc() in mmc_test_alloc_mem()

[Linus Walleij]

On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 10:50 PM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 21:43:12 +0100
>
> * The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.
>
>   WARNING: Prefer kcalloc over kzalloc with multiply
>
>   Thus fix the affected source code place.
>
> * Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
>   to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
>   the Linux coding style convention.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 8/8] mmc-core: Use kmalloc_array() in mmc_alloc_sg()

[Linus Walleij]

On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 10:55 PM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 22:10:40 +0100
>
> * A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
>   indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
>   Thus use the corresponding function "kmalloc_array".
>
>   This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> * Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
>   to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
>   the Linux coding style convention.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 8/8] mmc-core: Use kmalloc_array() in mmc_alloc_sg()

[Linus Walleij]

On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 10:55 PM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 22:10:40 +0100
>
> * A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
>   indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
>   Thus use the corresponding function "kmalloc_array".
>
>   This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> * Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
>   to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
>   the Linux coding style convention.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 1/8] mmc-core: Use kmalloc_array() in mmc_test_area_init()

[Chunyan Zhang]

On 10 January 2017 at 02:31, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 10:42 PM, SF Markus Elfring
> <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
>> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
>> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 18:44:26 +0100
>>
>> * A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
>>   indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
>>   Thus use the corresponding function "kmalloc_array".
>>
>>   This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>>
>> * Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
>>   to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
>>   the Linux coding style convention.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
>
> Chunyan has been running this test code so she might have additional
> insights to provide. I am not aware about anyone else really running the
> tests, are there people who do it?

I talked about mmc_test on #armlinux channel with a person whose
nickname was s84 other day. It seemed that s84 was also trying to use
mmc_test module.

Regards,
Chunyan

>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 1/8] mmc-core: Use kmalloc_array() in mmc_test_area_init()

[Chunyan Zhang]

On 10 January 2017 at 02:31, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 10:42 PM, SF Markus Elfring
> <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
>> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
>> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 18:44:26 +0100
>>
>> * A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
>>   indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
>>   Thus use the corresponding function "kmalloc_array".
>>
>>   This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>>
>> * Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
>>   to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
>>   the Linux coding style convention.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
>
> Chunyan has been running this test code so she might have additional
> insights to provide. I am not aware about anyone else really running the
> tests, are there people who do it?

I talked about mmc_test on #armlinux channel with a person whose
nickname was s84 other day. It seemed that s84 was also trying to use
mmc_test module.

Regards,
Chunyan

>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 8/8] mmc-core: Use kmalloc_array() in mmc_alloc_sg()

[Shawn Lin]

On 2017/1/9 5:55, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 22:10:40 +0100
>
> * A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
>   indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
>   Thus use the corresponding function "kmalloc_array".
>
>   This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> * Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
>   to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
>   the Linux coding style convention.
>

Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>

> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/core/queue.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c b/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c
> index a6496d8027bc..b1986622c60e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c
> @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static struct scatterlist *mmc_alloc_sg(int sg_len, int *err)
>  {
>  	struct scatterlist *sg;
>
> -	sg = kmalloc(sizeof(struct scatterlist)*sg_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	sg = kmalloc_array(sg_len, sizeof(*sg), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!sg)
>  		*err = -ENOMEM;
>  	else {
>


-- 
Best Regards
Shawn Lin

Re: [PATCH 8/8] mmc-core: Use kmalloc_array() in mmc_alloc_sg()

[Shawn Lin]

On 2017/1/9 5:55, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 22:10:40 +0100
>
> * A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
>   indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
>   Thus use the corresponding function "kmalloc_array".
>
>   This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> * Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
>   to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
>   the Linux coding style convention.
>

Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>

> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/core/queue.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c b/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c
> index a6496d8027bc..b1986622c60e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c
> @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static struct scatterlist *mmc_alloc_sg(int sg_len, int *err)
>  {
>  	struct scatterlist *sg;
>
> -	sg = kmalloc(sizeof(struct scatterlist)*sg_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	sg = kmalloc_array(sg_len, sizeof(*sg), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!sg)
>  		*err = -ENOMEM;
>  	else {
>


-- 
Best Regards
Shawn Lin

Re: [PATCH 7/8] mmc-core: Use kcalloc() in mmc_test_alloc_mem()

[Shawn Lin]

On 2017/1/9 5:50, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 21:43:12 +0100
>
> * The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.
>
>   WARNING: Prefer kcalloc over kzalloc with multiply
>
>   Thus fix the affected source code place.
>

Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>

> * Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
>   to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
>   the Linux coding style convention.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> index 294d3c675734..cb4750de2720 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> @@ -360,8 +360,7 @@ static struct mmc_test_mem *mmc_test_alloc_mem(unsigned long min_sz,
>  	if (!mem)
>  		return NULL;
>
> -	mem->arr = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mmc_test_pages) * max_segs,
> -			   GFP_KERNEL);
> +	mem->arr = kcalloc(max_segs, sizeof(*mem->arr), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!mem->arr)
>  		goto out_free;
>
>


-- 
Best Regards
Shawn Lin

Re: [PATCH 7/8] mmc-core: Use kcalloc() in mmc_test_alloc_mem()

[Shawn Lin]

On 2017/1/9 5:50, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 21:43:12 +0100
>
> * The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.
>
>   WARNING: Prefer kcalloc over kzalloc with multiply
>
>   Thus fix the affected source code place.
>

Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>

> * Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
>   to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
>   the Linux coding style convention.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> index 294d3c675734..cb4750de2720 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> @@ -360,8 +360,7 @@ static struct mmc_test_mem *mmc_test_alloc_mem(unsigned long min_sz,
>  	if (!mem)
>  		return NULL;
>
> -	mem->arr = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mmc_test_pages) * max_segs,
> -			   GFP_KERNEL);
> +	mem->arr = kcalloc(max_segs, sizeof(*mem->arr), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!mem->arr)
>  		goto out_free;
>
>


-- 
Best Regards
Shawn Lin

Re: [PATCH 6/8] mmc/core/mmc_test: Improve a size determination in five functions

[Shawn Lin]

On 2017/1/9 5:49, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 21:25:44 +0100
>
> Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
> as the parameter for the operator "sizeof" to make the corresponding size
> determination a bit safer according to the Linux coding style convention.
>


Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>

> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 11 +++++------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> index bb9f569a5dd5..294d3c675734 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> @@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ static struct mmc_test_mem *mmc_test_alloc_mem(unsigned long min_sz,
>  	if (max_segs > max_page_cnt)
>  		max_segs = max_page_cnt;
>
> -	mem = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mmc_test_mem), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	mem = kzalloc(sizeof(*mem), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!mem)
>  		return NULL;
>
> @@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ static void mmc_test_save_transfer_result(struct mmc_test_card *test,
>  	if (!test->gr)
>  		return;
>
> -	tr = kmalloc(sizeof(struct mmc_test_transfer_result), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	tr = kmalloc(sizeof(*tr), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!tr)
>  		return;
>
> @@ -2973,8 +2973,7 @@ static void mmc_test_run(struct mmc_test_card *test, int testcase)
>  			}
>  		}
>
> -		gr = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mmc_test_general_result),
> -			GFP_KERNEL);
> +		gr = kzalloc(sizeof(*gr), GFP_KERNEL);
>  		if (gr) {
>  			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&gr->tr_lst);
>
> @@ -3108,7 +3107,7 @@ static ssize_t mtf_test_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>
> -	test = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mmc_test_card), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	test = kzalloc(sizeof(*test), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!test)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>
> @@ -3213,7 +3212,7 @@ static int __mmc_test_register_dbgfs_file(struct mmc_card *card,
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
>
> -	df = kmalloc(sizeof(struct mmc_test_dbgfs_file), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	df = kmalloc(sizeof(*df), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!df) {
>  		debugfs_remove(file);
>  		dev_err(&card->dev,
>


-- 
Best Regards
Shawn Lin

Re: [PATCH 6/8] mmc/core/mmc_test: Improve a size determination in five functions

[Shawn Lin]

On 2017/1/9 5:49, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 21:25:44 +0100
>
> Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
> as the parameter for the operator "sizeof" to make the corresponding size
> determination a bit safer according to the Linux coding style convention.
>


Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>

> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 11 +++++------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> index bb9f569a5dd5..294d3c675734 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> @@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ static struct mmc_test_mem *mmc_test_alloc_mem(unsigned long min_sz,
>  	if (max_segs > max_page_cnt)
>  		max_segs = max_page_cnt;
>
> -	mem = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mmc_test_mem), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	mem = kzalloc(sizeof(*mem), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!mem)
>  		return NULL;
>
> @@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ static void mmc_test_save_transfer_result(struct mmc_test_card *test,
>  	if (!test->gr)
>  		return;
>
> -	tr = kmalloc(sizeof(struct mmc_test_transfer_result), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	tr = kmalloc(sizeof(*tr), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!tr)
>  		return;
>
> @@ -2973,8 +2973,7 @@ static void mmc_test_run(struct mmc_test_card *test, int testcase)
>  			}
>  		}
>
> -		gr = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mmc_test_general_result),
> -			GFP_KERNEL);
> +		gr = kzalloc(sizeof(*gr), GFP_KERNEL);
>  		if (gr) {
>  			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&gr->tr_lst);
>
> @@ -3108,7 +3107,7 @@ static ssize_t mtf_test_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>
> -	test = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mmc_test_card), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	test = kzalloc(sizeof(*test), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!test)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>
> @@ -3213,7 +3212,7 @@ static int __mmc_test_register_dbgfs_file(struct mmc_card *card,
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
>
> -	df = kmalloc(sizeof(struct mmc_test_dbgfs_file), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	df = kmalloc(sizeof(*df), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!df) {
>  		debugfs_remove(file);
>  		dev_err(&card->dev,
>


-- 
Best Regards
Shawn Lin

Re: [PATCH 5/8] mmc/core/mmc_test: Combine substrings for 5 messages

[Shawn Lin]

On 2017/1/9 5:47, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 20:56:48 +0100
>
> The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.
>
> WARNING: quoted string split across lines
>

yup, the print shouldn't blindly split itself to shut up
"WARNING: line over 80 characters" . FWIW,

Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>

> Thus fix affected source code places.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 15 +++++----------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> index 42aefd3df09b..bb9f569a5dd5 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> @@ -277,8 +277,7 @@ static int mmc_test_wait_busy(struct mmc_test_card *test)
>  		if (!busy && mmc_test_busy(&cmd)) {
>  			busy = 1;
>  			if (test->card->host->caps & MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY)
> -				pr_info("%s: Warning: Host did not "
> -					"wait for busy state to end.\n",
> +				pr_info("%s: Warning: Host did not wait for busy state to end.\n",
>  					mmc_hostname(test->card->host));
>  		}
>  	} while (mmc_test_busy(&cmd));
> @@ -2967,8 +2966,7 @@ static void mmc_test_run(struct mmc_test_card *test, int testcase)
>  		if (mmc_test_cases[i].prepare) {
>  			ret = mmc_test_cases[i].prepare(test);
>  			if (ret) {
> -				pr_info("%s: Result: Prepare "
> -					"stage failed! (%d)\n",
> +				pr_info("%s: Result: Prepare stage failed! (%d)\n",
>  					mmc_hostname(test->card->host),
>  					ret);
>  				continue;
> @@ -3005,13 +3003,11 @@ static void mmc_test_run(struct mmc_test_card *test, int testcase)
>  				mmc_hostname(test->card->host));
>  			break;
>  		case RESULT_UNSUP_HOST:
> -			pr_info("%s: Result: UNSUPPORTED "
> -				"(by host)\n",
> +			pr_info("%s: Result: UNSUPPORTED (by host)\n",
>  				mmc_hostname(test->card->host));
>  			break;
>  		case RESULT_UNSUP_CARD:
> -			pr_info("%s: Result: UNSUPPORTED "
> -				"(by card)\n",
> +			pr_info("%s: Result: UNSUPPORTED (by card)\n",
>  				mmc_hostname(test->card->host));
>  			break;
>  		default:
> @@ -3026,8 +3022,7 @@ static void mmc_test_run(struct mmc_test_card *test, int testcase)
>  		if (mmc_test_cases[i].cleanup) {
>  			ret = mmc_test_cases[i].cleanup(test);
>  			if (ret) {
> -				pr_info("%s: Warning: Cleanup "
> -					"stage failed! (%d)\n",
> +				pr_info("%s: Warning: Cleanup stage failed! (%d)\n",
>  					mmc_hostname(test->card->host),
>  					ret);
>  			}
>


-- 
Best Regards
Shawn Lin

Re: [PATCH 5/8] mmc/core/mmc_test: Combine substrings for 5 messages

[Shawn Lin]

On 2017/1/9 5:47, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 20:56:48 +0100
>
> The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.
>
> WARNING: quoted string split across lines
>

yup, the print shouldn't blindly split itself to shut up
"WARNING: line over 80 characters" . FWIW,

Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>

> Thus fix affected source code places.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 15 +++++----------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> index 42aefd3df09b..bb9f569a5dd5 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> @@ -277,8 +277,7 @@ static int mmc_test_wait_busy(struct mmc_test_card *test)
>  		if (!busy && mmc_test_busy(&cmd)) {
>  			busy = 1;
>  			if (test->card->host->caps & MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY)
> -				pr_info("%s: Warning: Host did not "
> -					"wait for busy state to end.\n",
> +				pr_info("%s: Warning: Host did not wait for busy state to end.\n",
>  					mmc_hostname(test->card->host));
>  		}
>  	} while (mmc_test_busy(&cmd));
> @@ -2967,8 +2966,7 @@ static void mmc_test_run(struct mmc_test_card *test, int testcase)
>  		if (mmc_test_cases[i].prepare) {
>  			ret = mmc_test_cases[i].prepare(test);
>  			if (ret) {
> -				pr_info("%s: Result: Prepare "
> -					"stage failed! (%d)\n",
> +				pr_info("%s: Result: Prepare stage failed! (%d)\n",
>  					mmc_hostname(test->card->host),
>  					ret);
>  				continue;
> @@ -3005,13 +3003,11 @@ static void mmc_test_run(struct mmc_test_card *test, int testcase)
>  				mmc_hostname(test->card->host));
>  			break;
>  		case RESULT_UNSUP_HOST:
> -			pr_info("%s: Result: UNSUPPORTED "
> -				"(by host)\n",
> +			pr_info("%s: Result: UNSUPPORTED (by host)\n",
>  				mmc_hostname(test->card->host));
>  			break;
>  		case RESULT_UNSUP_CARD:
> -			pr_info("%s: Result: UNSUPPORTED "
> -				"(by card)\n",
> +			pr_info("%s: Result: UNSUPPORTED (by card)\n",
>  				mmc_hostname(test->card->host));
>  			break;
>  		default:
> @@ -3026,8 +3022,7 @@ static void mmc_test_run(struct mmc_test_card *test, int testcase)
>  		if (mmc_test_cases[i].cleanup) {
>  			ret = mmc_test_cases[i].cleanup(test);
>  			if (ret) {
> -				pr_info("%s: Warning: Cleanup "
> -					"stage failed! (%d)\n",
> +				pr_info("%s: Warning: Cleanup stage failed! (%d)\n",
>  					mmc_hostname(test->card->host),
>  					ret);
>  			}
>


-- 
Best Regards
Shawn Lin

Re: [PATCH 4/8] mmc/core/mmc_test: Add some spaces for better code readability

[Shawn Lin]

On 2017/1/9 5:46, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 20:25:39 +0100
>
> Use space characters at some source code places according to
> the Linux coding style convention.
>

Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>

> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> index 848f4f30e343..42aefd3df09b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> @@ -641,11 +641,11 @@ static int __mmc_test_prepare(struct mmc_test_card *test, int write)
>  	if (write)
>  		memset(test->buffer, 0xDF, 512);
>  	else {
> -		for (i = 0;i < 512;i++)
> +		for (i = 0; i < 512; i++)
>  			test->buffer[i] = i;
>  	}
>
> -	for (i = 0;i < BUFFER_SIZE / 512;i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < BUFFER_SIZE / 512; i++) {
>  		ret = mmc_test_buffer_transfer(test, test->buffer, i, 512, 1);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
> @@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ static int mmc_test_cleanup(struct mmc_test_card *test)
>
>  	memset(test->buffer, 0, 512);
>
> -	for (i = 0;i < BUFFER_SIZE / 512;i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < BUFFER_SIZE / 512; i++) {
>  		ret = mmc_test_buffer_transfer(test, test->buffer, i, 512, 1);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
> @@ -946,7 +946,7 @@ static int mmc_test_transfer(struct mmc_test_card *test,
>  	unsigned long flags;
>
>  	if (write) {
> -		for (i = 0;i < blocks * blksz;i++)
> +		for (i = 0; i < blocks * blksz; i++)
>  			test->scratch[i] = i;
>  	} else {
>  		memset(test->scratch, 0, BUFFER_SIZE);
> @@ -980,7 +980,7 @@ static int mmc_test_transfer(struct mmc_test_card *test,
>
>  		memset(test->buffer, 0, sectors * 512);
>
> -		for (i = 0;i < sectors;i++) {
> +		for (i = 0; i < sectors; i++) {
>  			ret = mmc_test_buffer_transfer(test,
>  				test->buffer + i * 512,
>  				dev_addr + i, 512, 0);
> @@ -988,12 +988,12 @@ static int mmc_test_transfer(struct mmc_test_card *test,
>  				return ret;
>  		}
>
> -		for (i = 0;i < blocks * blksz;i++) {
> +		for (i = 0; i < blocks * blksz; i++) {
>  			if (test->buffer[i] != (u8)i)
>  				return RESULT_FAIL;
>  		}
>
> -		for (;i < sectors * 512;i++) {
> +		for (; i < sectors * 512; i++) {
>  			if (test->buffer[i] != 0xDF)
>  				return RESULT_FAIL;
>  		}
> @@ -1001,7 +1001,7 @@ static int mmc_test_transfer(struct mmc_test_card *test,
>  		local_irq_save(flags);
>  		sg_copy_to_buffer(sg, sg_len, test->scratch, BUFFER_SIZE);
>  		local_irq_restore(flags);
> -		for (i = 0;i < blocks * blksz;i++) {
> +		for (i = 0; i < blocks * blksz; i++) {
>  			if (test->scratch[i] != (u8)i)
>  				return RESULT_FAIL;
>  		}
> @@ -1086,7 +1086,7 @@ static int mmc_test_multi_write(struct mmc_test_card *test)
>
>  	sg_init_one(&sg, test->buffer, size);
>
> -	return mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size/512, 512, 1);
> +	return mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size / 512, 512, 1);
>  }
>
>  static int mmc_test_multi_read(struct mmc_test_card *test)
> @@ -1107,7 +1107,7 @@ static int mmc_test_multi_read(struct mmc_test_card *test)
>
>  	sg_init_one(&sg, test->buffer, size);
>
> -	return mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size/512, 512, 0);
> +	return mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size / 512, 512, 0);
>  }
>
>  static int mmc_test_pow2_write(struct mmc_test_card *test)
> @@ -1118,7 +1118,7 @@ static int mmc_test_pow2_write(struct mmc_test_card *test)
>  	if (!test->card->csd.write_partial)
>  		return RESULT_UNSUP_CARD;
>
> -	for (i = 1; i < 512;i <<= 1) {
> +	for (i = 1; i < 512; i <<= 1) {
>  		sg_init_one(&sg, test->buffer, i);
>  		ret = mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, 1, i, 1);
>  		if (ret)
> @@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ static int mmc_test_pow2_read(struct mmc_test_card *test)
>  	if (!test->card->csd.read_partial)
>  		return RESULT_UNSUP_CARD;
>
> -	for (i = 1; i < 512;i <<= 1) {
> +	for (i = 1; i < 512; i <<= 1) {
>  		sg_init_one(&sg, test->buffer, i);
>  		ret = mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, 1, i, 0);
>  		if (ret)
> @@ -1154,7 +1154,7 @@ static int mmc_test_weird_write(struct mmc_test_card *test)
>  	if (!test->card->csd.write_partial)
>  		return RESULT_UNSUP_CARD;
>
> -	for (i = 3; i < 512;i += 7) {
> +	for (i = 3; i < 512; i += 7) {
>  		sg_init_one(&sg, test->buffer, i);
>  		ret = mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, 1, i, 1);
>  		if (ret)
> @@ -1172,7 +1172,7 @@ static int mmc_test_weird_read(struct mmc_test_card *test)
>  	if (!test->card->csd.read_partial)
>  		return RESULT_UNSUP_CARD;
>
> -	for (i = 3; i < 512;i += 7) {
> +	for (i = 3; i < 512; i += 7) {
>  		sg_init_one(&sg, test->buffer, i);
>  		ret = mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, 1, i, 0);
>  		if (ret)
> @@ -1231,7 +1231,7 @@ static int mmc_test_align_multi_write(struct mmc_test_card *test)
>
>  	for (i = 1; i < TEST_ALIGN_END; i++) {
>  		sg_init_one(&sg, test->buffer + i, size);
> -		ret = mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size/512, 512, 1);
> +		ret = mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size / 512, 512, 1);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
>  	}
> @@ -1258,7 +1258,7 @@ static int mmc_test_align_multi_read(struct mmc_test_card *test)
>
>  	for (i = 1; i < TEST_ALIGN_END; i++) {
>  		sg_init_one(&sg, test->buffer + i, size);
> -		ret = mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size/512, 512, 0);
> +		ret = mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size / 512, 512, 0);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
>  	}
> @@ -1357,7 +1357,7 @@ static int mmc_test_multi_write_high(struct mmc_test_card *test)
>  	sg_init_table(&sg, 1);
>  	sg_set_page(&sg, test->highmem, size, 0);
>
> -	return mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size/512, 512, 1);
> +	return mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size / 512, 512, 1);
>  }
>
>  static int mmc_test_multi_read_high(struct mmc_test_card *test)
> @@ -1379,7 +1379,7 @@ static int mmc_test_multi_read_high(struct mmc_test_card *test)
>  	sg_init_table(&sg, 1);
>  	sg_set_page(&sg, test->highmem, size, 0);
>
> -	return mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size/512, 512, 0);
> +	return mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size / 512, 512, 0);
>  }
>
>  #else
> @@ -2147,7 +2147,7 @@ static int mmc_test_rw_multiple_sg_len(struct mmc_test_card *test,
>  	int i;
>
>  	for (i = 0 ; i < rw->len && ret == 0; i++) {
> -		ret = mmc_test_rw_multiple(test, rw, 512*1024, rw->size,
> +		ret = mmc_test_rw_multiple(test, rw, 512 * 1024, rw->size,
>  					   rw->sg_len[i]);
>  		if (ret)
>  			break;
> @@ -2954,7 +2954,7 @@ static void mmc_test_run(struct mmc_test_card *test, int testcase)
>
>  	mmc_claim_host(test->card->host);
>
> -	for (i = 0;i < ARRAY_SIZE(mmc_test_cases);i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mmc_test_cases); i++) {
>  		struct mmc_test_general_result *gr;
>
>  		if (testcase && ((i + 1) != testcase))
> @@ -3165,7 +3165,7 @@ static int mtf_testlist_show(struct seq_file *sf, void *data)
>
>  	seq_puts(sf, "0:\tRun all tests\n");
>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mmc_test_cases); i++)
> -		seq_printf(sf, "%d:\t%s\n", i+1, mmc_test_cases[i].name);
> +		seq_printf(sf, "%d:\t%s\n", i + 1, mmc_test_cases[i].name);
>
>  	mutex_unlock(&mmc_test_lock);
>
>


-- 
Best Regards
Shawn Lin

Re: [PATCH 4/8] mmc/core/mmc_test: Add some spaces for better code readability

[Shawn Lin]

On 2017/1/9 5:46, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 20:25:39 +0100
>
> Use space characters at some source code places according to
> the Linux coding style convention.
>

Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>

> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> index 848f4f30e343..42aefd3df09b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> @@ -641,11 +641,11 @@ static int __mmc_test_prepare(struct mmc_test_card *test, int write)
>  	if (write)
>  		memset(test->buffer, 0xDF, 512);
>  	else {
> -		for (i = 0;i < 512;i++)
> +		for (i = 0; i < 512; i++)
>  			test->buffer[i] = i;
>  	}
>
> -	for (i = 0;i < BUFFER_SIZE / 512;i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < BUFFER_SIZE / 512; i++) {
>  		ret = mmc_test_buffer_transfer(test, test->buffer, i, 512, 1);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
> @@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ static int mmc_test_cleanup(struct mmc_test_card *test)
>
>  	memset(test->buffer, 0, 512);
>
> -	for (i = 0;i < BUFFER_SIZE / 512;i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < BUFFER_SIZE / 512; i++) {
>  		ret = mmc_test_buffer_transfer(test, test->buffer, i, 512, 1);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
> @@ -946,7 +946,7 @@ static int mmc_test_transfer(struct mmc_test_card *test,
>  	unsigned long flags;
>
>  	if (write) {
> -		for (i = 0;i < blocks * blksz;i++)
> +		for (i = 0; i < blocks * blksz; i++)
>  			test->scratch[i] = i;
>  	} else {
>  		memset(test->scratch, 0, BUFFER_SIZE);
> @@ -980,7 +980,7 @@ static int mmc_test_transfer(struct mmc_test_card *test,
>
>  		memset(test->buffer, 0, sectors * 512);
>
> -		for (i = 0;i < sectors;i++) {
> +		for (i = 0; i < sectors; i++) {
>  			ret = mmc_test_buffer_transfer(test,
>  				test->buffer + i * 512,
>  				dev_addr + i, 512, 0);
> @@ -988,12 +988,12 @@ static int mmc_test_transfer(struct mmc_test_card *test,
>  				return ret;
>  		}
>
> -		for (i = 0;i < blocks * blksz;i++) {
> +		for (i = 0; i < blocks * blksz; i++) {
>  			if (test->buffer[i] != (u8)i)
>  				return RESULT_FAIL;
>  		}
>
> -		for (;i < sectors * 512;i++) {
> +		for (; i < sectors * 512; i++) {
>  			if (test->buffer[i] != 0xDF)
>  				return RESULT_FAIL;
>  		}
> @@ -1001,7 +1001,7 @@ static int mmc_test_transfer(struct mmc_test_card *test,
>  		local_irq_save(flags);
>  		sg_copy_to_buffer(sg, sg_len, test->scratch, BUFFER_SIZE);
>  		local_irq_restore(flags);
> -		for (i = 0;i < blocks * blksz;i++) {
> +		for (i = 0; i < blocks * blksz; i++) {
>  			if (test->scratch[i] != (u8)i)
>  				return RESULT_FAIL;
>  		}
> @@ -1086,7 +1086,7 @@ static int mmc_test_multi_write(struct mmc_test_card *test)
>
>  	sg_init_one(&sg, test->buffer, size);
>
> -	return mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size/512, 512, 1);
> +	return mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size / 512, 512, 1);
>  }
>
>  static int mmc_test_multi_read(struct mmc_test_card *test)
> @@ -1107,7 +1107,7 @@ static int mmc_test_multi_read(struct mmc_test_card *test)
>
>  	sg_init_one(&sg, test->buffer, size);
>
> -	return mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size/512, 512, 0);
> +	return mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size / 512, 512, 0);
>  }
>
>  static int mmc_test_pow2_write(struct mmc_test_card *test)
> @@ -1118,7 +1118,7 @@ static int mmc_test_pow2_write(struct mmc_test_card *test)
>  	if (!test->card->csd.write_partial)
>  		return RESULT_UNSUP_CARD;
>
> -	for (i = 1; i < 512;i <<= 1) {
> +	for (i = 1; i < 512; i <<= 1) {
>  		sg_init_one(&sg, test->buffer, i);
>  		ret = mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, 1, i, 1);
>  		if (ret)
> @@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ static int mmc_test_pow2_read(struct mmc_test_card *test)
>  	if (!test->card->csd.read_partial)
>  		return RESULT_UNSUP_CARD;
>
> -	for (i = 1; i < 512;i <<= 1) {
> +	for (i = 1; i < 512; i <<= 1) {
>  		sg_init_one(&sg, test->buffer, i);
>  		ret = mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, 1, i, 0);
>  		if (ret)
> @@ -1154,7 +1154,7 @@ static int mmc_test_weird_write(struct mmc_test_card *test)
>  	if (!test->card->csd.write_partial)
>  		return RESULT_UNSUP_CARD;
>
> -	for (i = 3; i < 512;i += 7) {
> +	for (i = 3; i < 512; i += 7) {
>  		sg_init_one(&sg, test->buffer, i);
>  		ret = mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, 1, i, 1);
>  		if (ret)
> @@ -1172,7 +1172,7 @@ static int mmc_test_weird_read(struct mmc_test_card *test)
>  	if (!test->card->csd.read_partial)
>  		return RESULT_UNSUP_CARD;
>
> -	for (i = 3; i < 512;i += 7) {
> +	for (i = 3; i < 512; i += 7) {
>  		sg_init_one(&sg, test->buffer, i);
>  		ret = mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, 1, i, 0);
>  		if (ret)
> @@ -1231,7 +1231,7 @@ static int mmc_test_align_multi_write(struct mmc_test_card *test)
>
>  	for (i = 1; i < TEST_ALIGN_END; i++) {
>  		sg_init_one(&sg, test->buffer + i, size);
> -		ret = mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size/512, 512, 1);
> +		ret = mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size / 512, 512, 1);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
>  	}
> @@ -1258,7 +1258,7 @@ static int mmc_test_align_multi_read(struct mmc_test_card *test)
>
>  	for (i = 1; i < TEST_ALIGN_END; i++) {
>  		sg_init_one(&sg, test->buffer + i, size);
> -		ret = mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size/512, 512, 0);
> +		ret = mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size / 512, 512, 0);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
>  	}
> @@ -1357,7 +1357,7 @@ static int mmc_test_multi_write_high(struct mmc_test_card *test)
>  	sg_init_table(&sg, 1);
>  	sg_set_page(&sg, test->highmem, size, 0);
>
> -	return mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size/512, 512, 1);
> +	return mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size / 512, 512, 1);
>  }
>
>  static int mmc_test_multi_read_high(struct mmc_test_card *test)
> @@ -1379,7 +1379,7 @@ static int mmc_test_multi_read_high(struct mmc_test_card *test)
>  	sg_init_table(&sg, 1);
>  	sg_set_page(&sg, test->highmem, size, 0);
>
> -	return mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size/512, 512, 0);
> +	return mmc_test_transfer(test, &sg, 1, 0, size / 512, 512, 0);
>  }
>
>  #else
> @@ -2147,7 +2147,7 @@ static int mmc_test_rw_multiple_sg_len(struct mmc_test_card *test,
>  	int i;
>
>  	for (i = 0 ; i < rw->len && ret = 0; i++) {
> -		ret = mmc_test_rw_multiple(test, rw, 512*1024, rw->size,
> +		ret = mmc_test_rw_multiple(test, rw, 512 * 1024, rw->size,
>  					   rw->sg_len[i]);
>  		if (ret)
>  			break;
> @@ -2954,7 +2954,7 @@ static void mmc_test_run(struct mmc_test_card *test, int testcase)
>
>  	mmc_claim_host(test->card->host);
>
> -	for (i = 0;i < ARRAY_SIZE(mmc_test_cases);i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mmc_test_cases); i++) {
>  		struct mmc_test_general_result *gr;
>
>  		if (testcase && ((i + 1) != testcase))
> @@ -3165,7 +3165,7 @@ static int mtf_testlist_show(struct seq_file *sf, void *data)
>
>  	seq_puts(sf, "0:\tRun all tests\n");
>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mmc_test_cases); i++)
> -		seq_printf(sf, "%d:\t%s\n", i+1, mmc_test_cases[i].name);
> +		seq_printf(sf, "%d:\t%s\n", i + 1, mmc_test_cases[i].name);
>
>  	mutex_unlock(&mmc_test_lock);
>
>


-- 
Best Regards
Shawn Lin

Re: [PATCH 3/8] mmc-core: Use seq_puts() in mtf_testlist_show()

[Shawn Lin]

On 2017/1/9 5:45, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 19:48:28 +0100
>
> The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.
>
> WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf

it saves some lock time,

Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>

>
> Thus fix the affected source code place.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> index 2f838a13a904..848f4f30e343 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> @@ -3163,7 +3163,7 @@ static int mtf_testlist_show(struct seq_file *sf, void *data)
>
>  	mutex_lock(&mmc_test_lock);
>
> -	seq_printf(sf, "0:\tRun all tests\n");
> +	seq_puts(sf, "0:\tRun all tests\n");
>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mmc_test_cases); i++)
>  		seq_printf(sf, "%d:\t%s\n", i+1, mmc_test_cases[i].name);
>
>


-- 
Best Regards
Shawn Lin

Re: [PATCH 3/8] mmc-core: Use seq_puts() in mtf_testlist_show()

[Shawn Lin]

On 2017/1/9 5:45, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 19:48:28 +0100
>
> The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.
>
> WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf

it saves some lock time,

Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>

>
> Thus fix the affected source code place.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> index 2f838a13a904..848f4f30e343 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> @@ -3163,7 +3163,7 @@ static int mtf_testlist_show(struct seq_file *sf, void *data)
>
>  	mutex_lock(&mmc_test_lock);
>
> -	seq_printf(sf, "0:\tRun all tests\n");
> +	seq_puts(sf, "0:\tRun all tests\n");
>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mmc_test_cases); i++)
>  		seq_printf(sf, "%d:\t%s\n", i+1, mmc_test_cases[i].name);
>
>


-- 
Best Regards
Shawn Lin

Re: [PATCH 2/8] mmc-core: Fix a typo in a comment line

[Shawn Lin]

On 2017/1/9 5:43, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 19:05:37 +0100
>
> Add a missing character in the function description.
>

Good catch!

Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>

> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> index e85ef503d7ce..2f838a13a904 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> @@ -1533,7 +1533,7 @@ static int mmc_test_area_cleanup(struct mmc_test_card *test)
>
>  /*
>   * Initialize an area for testing large transfers.  The test area is set to the
> - * middle of the card because cards may have different charateristics at the
> + * middle of the card because cards may have different characteristics at the
>   * front (for FAT file system optimization).  Optionally, the area is erased
>   * (if the card supports it) which may improve write performance.  Optionally,
>   * the area is filled with data for subsequent read tests.
>


-- 
Best Regards
Shawn Lin

Re: [PATCH 2/8] mmc-core: Fix a typo in a comment line

[Shawn Lin]

On 2017/1/9 5:43, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 19:05:37 +0100
>
> Add a missing character in the function description.
>

Good catch!

Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>

> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> index e85ef503d7ce..2f838a13a904 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> @@ -1533,7 +1533,7 @@ static int mmc_test_area_cleanup(struct mmc_test_card *test)
>
>  /*
>   * Initialize an area for testing large transfers.  The test area is set to the
> - * middle of the card because cards may have different charateristics at the
> + * middle of the card because cards may have different characteristics at the
>   * front (for FAT file system optimization).  Optionally, the area is erased
>   * (if the card supports it) which may improve write performance.  Optionally,
>   * the area is filled with data for subsequent read tests.
>


-- 
Best Regards
Shawn Lin

Re: [PATCH 1/8] mmc-core: Use kmalloc_array() in mmc_test_area_init()

[Shawn Lin]

On 2017/1/9 5:42, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 18:44:26 +0100
>
> * A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
>   indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
>   Thus use the corresponding function "kmalloc_array".
>
>   This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>

Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>

> * Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
>   to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
>   the Linux coding style convention.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> index 3ab6e52d106c..e85ef503d7ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> @@ -1579,7 +1579,7 @@ static int mmc_test_area_init(struct mmc_test_card *test, int erase, int fill)
>  	if (!t->mem)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>
> -	t->sg = kmalloc(sizeof(struct scatterlist) * t->max_segs, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	t->sg = kmalloc_array(t->max_segs, sizeof(*t->sg), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!t->sg) {
>  		ret = -ENOMEM;
>  		goto out_free;
>


-- 
Best Regards
Shawn Lin

Re: [PATCH 1/8] mmc-core: Use kmalloc_array() in mmc_test_area_init()

[Shawn Lin]

On 2017/1/9 5:42, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 18:44:26 +0100
>
> * A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
>   indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
>   Thus use the corresponding function "kmalloc_array".
>
>   This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>

Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>

> * Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
>   to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
>   the Linux coding style convention.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> index 3ab6e52d106c..e85ef503d7ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> @@ -1579,7 +1579,7 @@ static int mmc_test_area_init(struct mmc_test_card *test, int erase, int fill)
>  	if (!t->mem)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>
> -	t->sg = kmalloc(sizeof(struct scatterlist) * t->max_segs, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	t->sg = kmalloc_array(t->max_segs, sizeof(*t->sg), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!t->sg) {
>  		ret = -ENOMEM;
>  		goto out_free;
>


-- 
Best Regards
Shawn Lin

Re: [PATCH 1/8] mmc-core: Use kmalloc_array() in mmc_test_area_init()

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 11:42 PM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 18:44:26 +0100
>
> * A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
>   indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
>   Thus use the corresponding function "kmalloc_array".
>
>   This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> * Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
>   to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
>   the Linux coding style convention.

For the whole series FWIW:
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>


P.S. Few years back I run those tests a lot, even did some
modifications, but now Nokia Mobile just gone :-)

>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> index 3ab6e52d106c..e85ef503d7ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> @@ -1579,7 +1579,7 @@ static int mmc_test_area_init(struct mmc_test_card *test, int erase, int fill)
>         if (!t->mem)
>                 return -ENOMEM;
>
> -       t->sg = kmalloc(sizeof(struct scatterlist) * t->max_segs, GFP_KERNEL);
> +       t->sg = kmalloc_array(t->max_segs, sizeof(*t->sg), GFP_KERNEL);
>         if (!t->sg) {
>                 ret = -ENOMEM;
>                 goto out_free;
> --
> 2.11.0
>



-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Re: [PATCH 1/8] mmc-core: Use kmalloc_array() in mmc_test_area_init()

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 11:42 PM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 18:44:26 +0100
>
> * A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
>   indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
>   Thus use the corresponding function "kmalloc_array".
>
>   This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> * Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
>   to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
>   the Linux coding style convention.

For the whole series FWIW:
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>


P.S. Few years back I run those tests a lot, even did some
modifications, but now Nokia Mobile just gone :-)

>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> index 3ab6e52d106c..e85ef503d7ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> @@ -1579,7 +1579,7 @@ static int mmc_test_area_init(struct mmc_test_card *test, int erase, int fill)
>         if (!t->mem)
>                 return -ENOMEM;
>
> -       t->sg = kmalloc(sizeof(struct scatterlist) * t->max_segs, GFP_KERNEL);
> +       t->sg = kmalloc_array(t->max_segs, sizeof(*t->sg), GFP_KERNEL);
>         if (!t->sg) {
>                 ret = -ENOMEM;
>                 goto out_free;
> --
> 2.11.0
>



-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Re: [PATCH 0/8] MMC-core: Fine-tuning for some function implementations

[Ulf Hansson]

On 8 January 2017 at 22:38, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 22:30:03 +0100
>
> Some update suggestions were taken into account
> from static source code analysis.
>
> Markus Elfring (8):
>   Use kmalloc_array() in mmc_test_area_init()
>   Fix a typo in a comment line
>   Use seq_puts() in mtf_testlist_show()
>   mmc_test: Add some spaces for better code readability
>   mmc_test: Combine substrings for 5 messages
>   mmc_test: Improve a size determination in five functions
>   Use kcalloc() in mmc_test_alloc_mem()
>   Use kmalloc_array() in mmc_alloc_sg()
>
>  drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>  drivers/mmc/core/queue.c    |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>

Thanks applied for next, with some changes to the prefix of the commit
message headers.

Kind regards
Uffe

Re: [PATCH 0/8] MMC-core: Fine-tuning for some function implementations

[Ulf Hansson]

On 8 January 2017 at 22:38, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 22:30:03 +0100
>
> Some update suggestions were taken into account
> from static source code analysis.
>
> Markus Elfring (8):
>   Use kmalloc_array() in mmc_test_area_init()
>   Fix a typo in a comment line
>   Use seq_puts() in mtf_testlist_show()
>   mmc_test: Add some spaces for better code readability
>   mmc_test: Combine substrings for 5 messages
>   mmc_test: Improve a size determination in five functions
>   Use kcalloc() in mmc_test_alloc_mem()
>   Use kmalloc_array() in mmc_alloc_sg()
>
>  drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>  drivers/mmc/core/queue.c    |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>

Thanks applied for next, with some changes to the prefix of the commit
message headers.

Kind regards
Uffe