On Thu, 2020-04-16 at 18:21 +0200, speck for Mark Gross wrote:
> From: Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 4/4] x86/speculation: Add SRBDS vulnerability and mitigation
>  documentation
> 
> commit 7222a1b5b87417f22265c92deea76a6aecd0fb0f upstream
> 
> Add documentation for the SRBDS vulnerability and its mitigation.
> 
>  [ bp: Massage.
>    jpoimboe: sysfs table strings. ]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
> ---
>  .../special-register-buffer-data-sampling.rst | 148 ++++++++++++++++++
>  Documentation/hw-vuln/index.rst               |   1 +
>  2 files changed, 149 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/special-register-buffer-data-sampling.rst
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/special-register-buffer-data-sampling.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/special-register-buffer-data-sampling.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..6a473da80b62
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/special-register-buffer-data-sampling.rst
[...]

This should go under Documentation/hw-vuln as there is no admin-guide
directory on 4.9...

> --- a/Documentation/hw-vuln/index.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/hw-vuln/index.rst
> @@ -13,3 +13,4 @@ are configurable at compile, boot or run time.
>     mds
>     tsx_async_abort
>     multihit.rst
> +   special-register-buffer-data-sampling.rst

...and this index will be broken.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.