From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58863) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dwRWa-0006Ri-GV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 07:26:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dwRWX-0008WB-D6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 07:26:08 -0400 References: <20170915090643.6043-1-otubo@redhat.com> <0e84971b-592e-22f7-8815-2b3e193f6c1d@redhat.com> <20170925092641.GD12137@vader> <52fe072e-8e53-0610-2195-3ef8e120b553@msgid.tls.msk.ru> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 13:25:58 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <52fe072e-8e53-0610-2195-3ef8e120b553@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] dma/i82374: avoid double creation of i82374 device List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michael Tokarev , Eduardo Otubo Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, ehabkost@redhat.com, qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, Alexander Graf , Markus Armbruster On 25/09/2017 12:54, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> Yes, that's correct. I can revert this patch with the error >> propagation patch as well, if you guys don't mind. > Hmm. After reading the original discussion I concluded this patch > is okay. I can remove it right now before the series has been > applied, together with another tiny change. No problem, it's okay for now as a trivial change. Paolo