From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:18:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from qb-out-0506.google.com ([72.14.204.235]:36308 "EHLO qb-out-0506.google.com") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S20038861AbXBMRSc (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:18:32 +0000 Received: by qb-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id e12so789079qba for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:17:26 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=iSADV7FD1cRYlSwZhpcxSFwW4iV5i/V+qtu5iiYMChHKEJsO70bIc/gyxA7NrPB05hsIhSozgYSGCJuT6M5D7mPHIwXTxUKN0Y64AgZiA1iCnKQFC380JfZIlw0M38ndupsL82XpNOV9VsakQ0aC3viNxVP+twscOFPI0yJjhxY= Received: by 10.114.211.1 with SMTP id j1mr6879450wag.1171387045157; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:17:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.136.11 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:17:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 18:17:25 +0100 From: "Franck Bui-Huu" To: "Ralf Baechle" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] signal.c: fix gcc warning on 32 bits kernel Cc: "Atsushi Nemoto" , linux-mips@linux-mips.org In-Reply-To: <20070213020556.GA5875@linux-mips.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070209210014.GA26939@linux-mips.org> <20070212140459.GA9679@linux-mips.org> <20070213.002545.03977174.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <20070213014345.GA30988@linux-mips.org> <20070213020556.GA5875@linux-mips.org> Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 14081 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: vagabon.xyz@gmail.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On 2/13/07, Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 01:43:45AM +0000, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > > Well, I reverted that the old state of a warning is definately preferable > > until we found a proper solution. > > Type-punning should do the trick. > yes it does. thanks. -- Franck