From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F855C433DB for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 15:50:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB7D622C7B for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 15:50:42 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AB7D622C7B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.72229.129897 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l2cED-0001gZ-Ad; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 15:50:33 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 72229.129897; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 15:50:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l2cED-0001gS-6l; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 15:50:33 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 72229; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 15:50:31 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l2cEB-0001gL-8N for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 15:50:31 +0000 Received: from mx2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.15]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 33a54502-b5f2-4995-abf3-a55f5089d2b2; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 15:50:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0EEEABD6; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 15:50:29 +0000 (UTC) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: 33a54502-b5f2-4995-abf3-a55f5089d2b2 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1611244229; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=q/Jkbzq/dHL05kZlzk1VtEEKlPNCqDuK37IGtMzlnQc=; b=hb4OUuTwiiBiYjbmKffbHmy2TCYQR3kY/n1R5e0ezvzl/S5aax8m2+9onh5g11vLUS9ju9 6YlGbSshjMZwMFYKERI6yL+6hJd610VaVu3KMNxXG6rqqVlv3ZdzouBfHAO1xx3FRf9eI6 vbcTUEMOst1/8QNu8oX2cD/hdvUwWds= Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] xen/cpupool: add scheduling granularity entry to cpupool entries To: Juergen Gross Cc: Andrew Cooper , George Dunlap , Ian Jackson , Julien Grall , Stefano Stabellini , Wei Liu , Dario Faggioli , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org References: <20210118115516.11001-1-jgross@suse.com> <20210118115516.11001-5-jgross@suse.com> From: Jan Beulich Message-ID: Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 16:50:29 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210118115516.11001-5-jgross@suse.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 18.01.2021 12:55, Juergen Gross wrote: > Add a "sched-gran" entry to the per-cpupool hypfs directories. > > For now make this entry read-only and let it contain one of the > strings "cpu", "core" or "socket". > > Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich