From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B484C433E6 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:46:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66A6B224F9 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:46:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730114AbhAKLql (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 06:46:41 -0500 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:11006 "EHLO szxga05-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730090AbhAKLqk (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 06:46:40 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4DDsMG5Q4Vzj61M; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:44:58 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.136.114.67] (10.136.114.67) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.498.0; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:45:53 +0800 Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3 1/5] f2fs: compress: add compress_inode to cache compressed blocks From: Chao Yu To: Jaegeuk Kim CC: , References: <20210107093126.116958-1-yuchao0@huawei.com> <6b0060b9-460a-617a-3778-e67f35d551f0@huawei.com> Message-ID: Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:45:52 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6b0060b9-460a-617a-3778-e67f35d551f0@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.136.114.67] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021/1/11 18:31, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2021/1/11 17:48, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >> Hi Chao, >> >> After quick test of fsstress w/ fault injection, it gave wrong block address >> errors. Could you please run the test a bit? > > Jaegeuk, > > Oh, I've covered with fstest cases and there is no such error message, let me > try fault injection + SPO case soon. Till now, I haven't see any problem... will let the test run for longer time in this night. Could you share me detailed error message you encounter? Thanks, > > Thanks, > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list > Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel > . > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFCCEC433DB for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:46:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C40622510; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:46:24 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5C40622510 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyveR-0008F4-If; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:46:23 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyveP-0008Eq-K1 for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:46:21 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:References:CC:To:From:Subject:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=K+M5psITX6jYjPY16h2py/mfK3EhSXtM3h6fi9yjqkg=; b=GsxRN9COdwLcFdnlgkAWB96nCM LsXKTCsoTkskeobf41r2+KdxF9tiUZvu8vjNZ/sGKiHQt8YH6miKBr0KjYXA05rhXy3q64OICZr6S BTXFBYNIdUeUhaTjw419tlKruRoau5VV28vVOaUP8tNRL6UHVmLnSltvuVPFhTzsoGGU=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:References:CC:To:From:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=K+M5psITX6jYjPY16h2py/mfK3EhSXtM3h6fi9yjqkg=; b=ezXrmulNwZ+R99Bjf64q4pz8mH Tvd14rPcdRXmD4rhy1tMxMHyPCEAaMeawIHUlfmQzai+7vKO6VD8f7N9vQowt+wedrqwiYki3W77t YsG3/SKxDdd2KL/q24D8de6YzI39Bjwv8yvNCpPp9Q4Ht8reGUxMWG7WX9+KRum4B3d0=; Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]) by sfi-mx-3.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1kyveC-000yf1-So for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:46:21 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4DDsMG5Q4Vzj61M; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:44:58 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.136.114.67] (10.136.114.67) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.498.0; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:45:53 +0800 From: Chao Yu To: Jaegeuk Kim References: <20210107093126.116958-1-yuchao0@huawei.com> <6b0060b9-460a-617a-3778-e67f35d551f0@huawei.com> Message-ID: Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:45:52 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6b0060b9-460a-617a-3778-e67f35d551f0@huawei.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.136.114.67] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Headers-End: 1kyveC-000yf1-So Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3 1/5] f2fs: compress: add compress_inode to cache compressed blocks X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 2021/1/11 18:31, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2021/1/11 17:48, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >> Hi Chao, >> >> After quick test of fsstress w/ fault injection, it gave wrong block address >> errors. Could you please run the test a bit? > > Jaegeuk, > > Oh, I've covered with fstest cases and there is no such error message, let me > try fault injection + SPO case soon. Till now, I haven't see any problem... will let the test run for longer time in this night. Could you share me detailed error message you encounter? Thanks, > > Thanks, > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list > Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel > . > _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel