From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: [PATCH 10/11] powerpc/pseries/svm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:26:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ce42e6ff7debc5b724c63352817e4346439d3160.1627424774.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1627424773.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
The mem_encrypt_active() function has been replaced by prot_guest_has(),
so remove the implementation.
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
index ba9dab07c1be..2f26b8fc8d29 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
@@ -10,11 +10,6 @@
#include <asm/svm.h>
-static inline bool mem_encrypt_active(void)
-{
- return is_secure_guest();
-}
-
static inline bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev)
{
return is_secure_guest();
--
2.32.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: [PATCH 10/11] powerpc/pseries/svm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:26:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ce42e6ff7debc5b724c63352817e4346439d3160.1627424774.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1627424773.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
The mem_encrypt_active() function has been replaced by prot_guest_has(),
so remove the implementation.
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
index ba9dab07c1be..2f26b8fc8d29 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
@@ -10,11 +10,6 @@
#include <asm/svm.h>
-static inline bool mem_encrypt_active(void)
-{
- return is_secure_guest();
-}
-
static inline bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev)
{
return is_secure_guest();
--
2.32.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tom Lendacky via iommu <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: [PATCH 10/11] powerpc/pseries/svm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:26:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ce42e6ff7debc5b724c63352817e4346439d3160.1627424774.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1627424773.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
The mem_encrypt_active() function has been replaced by prot_guest_has(),
so remove the implementation.
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
index ba9dab07c1be..2f26b8fc8d29 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
@@ -10,11 +10,6 @@
#include <asm/svm.h>
-static inline bool mem_encrypt_active(void)
-{
- return is_secure_guest();
-}
-
static inline bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev)
{
return is_secure_guest();
--
2.32.0
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: [PATCH 10/11] powerpc/pseries/svm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:26:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ce42e6ff7debc5b724c63352817e4346439d3160.1627424774.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1627424773.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
The mem_encrypt_active() function has been replaced by prot_guest_has(),
so remove the implementation.
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
index ba9dab07c1be..2f26b8fc8d29 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
@@ -10,11 +10,6 @@
#include <asm/svm.h>
-static inline bool mem_encrypt_active(void)
-{
- return is_secure_guest();
-}
-
static inline bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev)
{
return is_secure_guest();
--
2.32.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: [PATCH 10/11] powerpc/pseries/svm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:26:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ce42e6ff7debc5b724c63352817e4346439d3160.1627424774.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1627424773.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
The mem_encrypt_active() function has been replaced by prot_guest_has(),
so remove the implementation.
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
index ba9dab07c1be..2f26b8fc8d29 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
@@ -10,11 +10,6 @@
#include <asm/svm.h>
-static inline bool mem_encrypt_active(void)
-{
- return is_secure_guest();
-}
-
static inline bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev)
{
return is_secure_guest();
--
2.32.0
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: [PATCH 10/11] powerpc/pseries/svm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:26:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ce42e6ff7debc5b724c63352817e4346439d3160.1627424774.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1627424773.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
The mem_encrypt_active() function has been replaced by prot_guest_has(),
so remove the implementation.
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
index ba9dab07c1be..2f26b8fc8d29 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
@@ -10,11 +10,6 @@
#include <asm/svm.h>
-static inline bool mem_encrypt_active(void)
-{
- return is_secure_guest();
-}
-
static inline bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev)
{
return is_secure_guest();
--
2.32.0
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-27 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 214+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-27 22:26 [PATCH 00/11] Implement generic prot_guest_has() helper function Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 01/11] mm: Introduce a function to check for virtualization protection features Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-28 13:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-28 13:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-28 13:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-28 13:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-28 13:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-28 16:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-07-28 16:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-07-28 16:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-07-28 16:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-07-28 16:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-02 10:34 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:34 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:34 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:34 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-11 14:53 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-11 14:53 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-11 14:53 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-11 14:53 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-11 14:53 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-11 15:39 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-11 15:39 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-11 15:39 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-11 15:39 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-11 15:39 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 02/11] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has() Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-28 13:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-28 13:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-28 13:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-28 13:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-28 13:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-29 14:24 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-29 14:24 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-29 14:24 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-29 14:24 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-29 14:24 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 10:35 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:35 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:35 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:35 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 03/11] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc " Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 04/11] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with prot_guest_has() Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 10:37 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:37 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:37 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:37 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 05/11] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_active() " Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 10:42 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:42 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:42 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:42 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 06/11] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_es_active() " Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 10:45 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:45 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:45 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:45 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-09 21:59 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 21:59 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 21:59 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 21:59 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-09 21:59 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 22:08 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-09 22:08 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-09 22:08 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-09 22:08 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-09 22:08 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 07/11] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() " Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-30 22:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-30 22:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-30 22:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-30 22:34 ` Sean Christopherson via iommu
2021-07-30 22:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-08-09 21:55 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 21:55 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 21:55 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 21:55 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-09 21:55 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 12:42 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-08-02 12:42 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-08-02 12:42 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-08-02 12:42 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-08-02 12:42 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-08-09 22:04 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 22:04 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 22:04 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 22:04 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-09 22:04 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-10 18:45 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-10 18:45 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-10 18:45 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-10 18:45 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-10 18:45 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-10 19:48 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-10 19:48 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-10 19:48 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-10 19:48 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-10 19:48 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-10 20:09 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-10 20:09 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-10 20:09 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-10 20:09 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-10 20:09 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-11 12:19 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-11 12:19 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-11 12:19 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-11 12:19 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-11 12:19 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-11 15:52 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-11 15:52 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-11 15:52 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-11 15:52 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-11 15:52 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-12 10:07 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-12 10:07 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-12 10:07 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-12 10:07 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-12 10:07 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-13 17:08 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 17:08 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 17:08 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 17:08 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-13 17:08 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 20:17 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 20:17 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 20:17 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 20:17 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-13 20:17 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 08/11] mm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 10:47 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:47 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:47 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:47 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 09/11] x86/sev: " Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 10:46 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:46 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:46 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:46 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky [this message]
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 10/11] powerpc/pseries/svm: " Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 11/11] s390/mm: " Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:37 ` [PATCH 00/11] Implement generic prot_guest_has() helper function Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:37 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:37 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:37 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:37 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:37 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-28 11:50 ` Christian König
2021-07-28 11:50 ` Christian König
2021-07-28 11:50 ` Christian König
2021-07-28 11:50 ` Christian König
2021-07-28 11:50 ` Christian König
2021-07-28 11:50 ` Christian König
2021-08-09 1:41 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-09 1:41 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-09 1:41 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-09 1:41 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-09 1:41 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-09 22:16 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 22:16 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 22:16 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 22:16 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-09 22:16 ` Tom Lendacky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ce42e6ff7debc5b724c63352817e4346439d3160.1627424774.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.