On 1/11/2022 7:51 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 01:12:12 +0800 > kernel test robot wrote: > >> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<): >> >>>> WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x2c44): Section mismatch in reference from the function trace_define_generic_fields() to the variable .init.data:initcall_level_names >> The function trace_define_generic_fields() references >> the variable __initdata initcall_level_names. >> This is often because trace_define_generic_fields lacks a __initdata >> annotation or the annotation of initcall_level_names is wrong. > > I keep getting this, and it looks like a bug in the compiler not the kernel > code. > > We have: > > int filter_assign_type(const char *type) > { > if (strstr(type, "__data_loc") && strstr(type, "char")) > return FILTER_DYN_STRING; > > if (strstr(type, "__rel_loc") && strstr(type, "char")) > return FILTER_RDYN_STRING; > > if (strchr(type, '[') && strstr(type, "char")) > return FILTER_STATIC_STRING; > > if (strcmp(type, "char *") == 0 || strcmp(type, "const char *") == 0) > return FILTER_PTR_STRING; > > return FILTER_OTHER; > } > > static int __trace_define_field(struct list_head *head, const char *type, > const char *name, int offset, int size, > int is_signed, int filter_type) > { > struct ftrace_event_field *field; > > field = kmem_cache_alloc(field_cachep, GFP_TRACE); > if (!field) > return -ENOMEM; > > field->name = name; > field->type = type; > > if (filter_type == FILTER_OTHER) > field->filter_type = filter_assign_type(type); > else > field->filter_type = filter_type; > > field->offset = offset; > field->size = size; > field->is_signed = is_signed; > > list_add(&field->link, head); > > return 0; > } > > #define is_signed_type(type) (((type)(-1)) < (type)1) > > static LIST_HEAD(ftrace_generic_fields); > > #define __generic_field(type, item, filter_type) \ > ret = __trace_define_field(&ftrace_generic_fields, #type, \ > #item, 0, 0, is_signed_type(type), \ > filter_type); \ > if (ret) \ > return ret; > > > static int trace_define_generic_fields(void) > { > int ret; > > __generic_field(int, CPU, FILTER_CPU); > __generic_field(int, cpu, FILTER_CPU); > __generic_field(char *, COMM, FILTER_COMM); > __generic_field(char *, comm, FILTER_COMM); > > return ret; > } > > > Please tell me where initcall_level_names is being referenced? > > Either fix the compiler or tell me exactly what the bug is. Otherwise, stop > sending me this. > > -- Steve Hi Steve, I'm not familiar with the code, the warning can be silenced with the below change: --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(trace_define_field); if (ret) \ return ret; -static int trace_define_generic_fields(void) +static __init int trace_define_generic_fields(void) { int ret; @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static int trace_define_generic_fields(void) return ret; } -static int trace_define_common_fields(void) +static __init int trace_define_common_fields(void) { int ret; struct trace_entry ent; If the warning can't be fixed, we'll add the warning to the ignore list. Best Regards, Rong Chen