From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934306AbdA0Lcg (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jan 2017 06:32:36 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:36797 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933693AbdA0LNL (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jan 2017 06:13:11 -0500 X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "References" From: Jiri Slaby To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Linus Walleij , Jiri Slaby Subject: [PATCH 3.12 192/235] ARM: ux500: fix prcmu_is_cpu_in_wfi() calculation Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 11:55:25 +0100 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.11.0 In-Reply-To: <5b46dc789ca2be4046e4e40a131858d386cac741.1485514374.git.jslaby@suse.cz> References: <5b46dc789ca2be4046e4e40a131858d386cac741.1485514374.git.jslaby@suse.cz> In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Arnd Bergmann 3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. =============== commit f0e8faa7a5e894b0fc99d24be1b18685a92ea466 upstream. This function clearly never worked and always returns true, as pointed out by gcc-7: arch/arm/mach-ux500/pm.c: In function 'prcmu_is_cpu_in_wfi': arch/arm/mach-ux500/pm.c:137:212: error: ?: using integer constants in boolean context, the expression will always evaluate to 'true' [-Werror=int-in-bool-context] With the added braces, the condition actually makes sense. Fixes: 34fe6f107eab ("mfd : Check if the other db8500 core is in WFI") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby --- arch/arm/mach-ux500/pm.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/pm.c index 1a468f0fd22e..9d532568b8b3 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/pm.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/pm.c @@ -128,8 +128,8 @@ bool prcmu_pending_irq(void) */ bool prcmu_is_cpu_in_wfi(int cpu) { - return readl(PRCM_ARM_WFI_STANDBY) & cpu ? PRCM_ARM_WFI_STANDBY_WFI1 : - PRCM_ARM_WFI_STANDBY_WFI0; + return readl(PRCM_ARM_WFI_STANDBY) & + (cpu ? PRCM_ARM_WFI_STANDBY_WFI1 : PRCM_ARM_WFI_STANDBY_WFI0); } /* -- 2.11.0