All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH net-next] skbuff: revert "skbuff: remove some unnecessary operation in skb_segment_list()"
@ 2021-04-14 10:48 Paolo Abeni
  2021-04-14 21:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  2021-04-15  2:23 ` Yunsheng Lin
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2021-04-14 10:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: Yunsheng Lin, Dongseok Yi, Willem de Bruijn

the commit 1ddc3229ad3c ("skbuff: remove some unnecessary operation
in skb_segment_list()") introduces an issue very similar to the
one already fixed by commit 53475c5dd856 ("net: fix use-after-free when
UDP GRO with shared fraglist").

If the GSO skb goes though skb_clone() and pskb_expand_head() before
entering skb_segment_list(), the latter  will unshare the frag_list
skbs and will release the old list. With the reverted commit in place,
when skb_segment_list() completes, skb->next points to the just
released list, and later on the kernel will hit UaF.

Note that since commit e0e3070a9bc9 ("udp: properly complete L4 GRO
over UDP tunnel packet") the critical scenario can be reproduced also
receiving UDP over vxlan traffic with:

NIC (NETIF_F_GRO_FRAGLIST enabled) -> vxlan -> UDP sink

Attaching a packet socket to the NIC will cause skb_clone() and the
tunnel decapsulation will call pskb_expand_head().

Fixes: 1ddc3229ad3c ("skbuff: remove some unnecessary operation in skb_segment_list()")
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
---
 net/core/skbuff.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index 3ad9e8425ab2..14010c0eec48 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -3773,13 +3773,13 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment_list(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	unsigned int tnl_hlen = skb_tnl_header_len(skb);
 	unsigned int delta_truesize = 0;
 	unsigned int delta_len = 0;
+	struct sk_buff *tail = NULL;
 	struct sk_buff *nskb, *tmp;
 	int err;
 
 	skb_push(skb, -skb_network_offset(skb) + offset);
 
 	skb_shinfo(skb)->frag_list = NULL;
-	skb->next = list_skb;
 
 	do {
 		nskb = list_skb;
@@ -3797,8 +3797,17 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment_list(struct sk_buff *skb,
 			}
 		}
 
-		if (unlikely(err))
+		if (!tail)
+			skb->next = nskb;
+		else
+			tail->next = nskb;
+
+		if (unlikely(err)) {
+			nskb->next = list_skb;
 			goto err_linearize;
+		}
+
+		tail = nskb;
 
 		delta_len += nskb->len;
 		delta_truesize += nskb->truesize;
@@ -3825,7 +3834,7 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment_list(struct sk_buff *skb,
 
 	skb_gso_reset(skb);
 
-	skb->prev = nskb;
+	skb->prev = tail;
 
 	if (skb_needs_linearize(skb, features) &&
 	    __skb_linearize(skb))
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next] skbuff: revert "skbuff: remove some unnecessary operation in skb_segment_list()"
  2021-04-14 10:48 [PATCH net-next] skbuff: revert "skbuff: remove some unnecessary operation in skb_segment_list()" Paolo Abeni
@ 2021-04-14 21:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  2021-04-15  2:23 ` Yunsheng Lin
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2021-04-14 21:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Abeni; +Cc: netdev, linyunsheng, dseok.yi, willemb

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (refs/heads/master):

On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 12:48:48 +0200 you wrote:
> the commit 1ddc3229ad3c ("skbuff: remove some unnecessary operation
> in skb_segment_list()") introduces an issue very similar to the
> one already fixed by commit 53475c5dd856 ("net: fix use-after-free when
> UDP GRO with shared fraglist").
> 
> If the GSO skb goes though skb_clone() and pskb_expand_head() before
> entering skb_segment_list(), the latter  will unshare the frag_list
> skbs and will release the old list. With the reverted commit in place,
> when skb_segment_list() completes, skb->next points to the just
> released list, and later on the kernel will hit UaF.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next] skbuff: revert "skbuff: remove some unnecessary operation in skb_segment_list()"
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/17c3df7078e3

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next] skbuff: revert "skbuff: remove some unnecessary operation in skb_segment_list()"
  2021-04-14 10:48 [PATCH net-next] skbuff: revert "skbuff: remove some unnecessary operation in skb_segment_list()" Paolo Abeni
  2021-04-14 21:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
@ 2021-04-15  2:23 ` Yunsheng Lin
  2021-04-15  4:10   ` Dongseok Yi
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yunsheng Lin @ 2021-04-15  2:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Abeni, netdev; +Cc: Dongseok Yi, Willem de Bruijn

On 2021/4/14 18:48, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> the commit 1ddc3229ad3c ("skbuff: remove some unnecessary operation
> in skb_segment_list()") introduces an issue very similar to the
> one already fixed by commit 53475c5dd856 ("net: fix use-after-free when
> UDP GRO with shared fraglist").
> 
> If the GSO skb goes though skb_clone() and pskb_expand_head() before
> entering skb_segment_list(), the latter  will unshare the frag_list
> skbs and will release the old list. With the reverted commit in place,
> when skb_segment_list() completes, skb->next points to the just
> released list, and later on the kernel will hit UaF.

In that case, is "nskb->next = list_skb" needed before jumpping to
error when __skb_linearize() fails? As there is "nskb->next = list_skb"
before jumpping to error handling when skb_clone() fails.

The inconsistency above is the reason I sent the reverted patch:)

> 
> Note that since commit e0e3070a9bc9 ("udp: properly complete L4 GRO
> over UDP tunnel packet") the critical scenario can be reproduced also
> receiving UDP over vxlan traffic with:
> 
> NIC (NETIF_F_GRO_FRAGLIST enabled) -> vxlan -> UDP sink
> 
> Attaching a packet socket to the NIC will cause skb_clone() and the
> tunnel decapsulation will call pskb_expand_head().
> 
> Fixes: 1ddc3229ad3c ("skbuff: remove some unnecessary operation in skb_segment_list()")
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> ---
>  net/core/skbuff.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> index 3ad9e8425ab2..14010c0eec48 100644
> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> @@ -3773,13 +3773,13 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment_list(struct sk_buff *skb,
>  	unsigned int tnl_hlen = skb_tnl_header_len(skb);
>  	unsigned int delta_truesize = 0;
>  	unsigned int delta_len = 0;
> +	struct sk_buff *tail = NULL;
>  	struct sk_buff *nskb, *tmp;
>  	int err;
>  
>  	skb_push(skb, -skb_network_offset(skb) + offset);
>  
>  	skb_shinfo(skb)->frag_list = NULL;
> -	skb->next = list_skb;
>  
>  	do {
>  		nskb = list_skb;
> @@ -3797,8 +3797,17 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment_list(struct sk_buff *skb,
>  			}
>  		}
>  
> -		if (unlikely(err))
> +		if (!tail)
> +			skb->next = nskb;
> +		else
> +			tail->next = nskb;
> +
> +		if (unlikely(err)) {
> +			nskb->next = list_skb;
>  			goto err_linearize;
> +		}
> +
> +		tail = nskb;
>  
>  		delta_len += nskb->len;
>  		delta_truesize += nskb->truesize;
> @@ -3825,7 +3834,7 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment_list(struct sk_buff *skb,
>  
>  	skb_gso_reset(skb);
>  
> -	skb->prev = nskb;
> +	skb->prev = tail;
>  
>  	if (skb_needs_linearize(skb, features) &&
>  	    __skb_linearize(skb))
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH net-next] skbuff: revert "skbuff: remove some unnecessary operation in skb_segment_list()"
  2021-04-15  2:23 ` Yunsheng Lin
@ 2021-04-15  4:10   ` Dongseok Yi
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dongseok Yi @ 2021-04-15  4:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Yunsheng Lin', 'Paolo Abeni', netdev
  Cc: 'Willem de Bruijn'

On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 10:23:17AM +0800, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> On 2021/4/14 18:48, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > the commit 1ddc3229ad3c ("skbuff: remove some unnecessary operation
> > in skb_segment_list()") introduces an issue very similar to the
> > one already fixed by commit 53475c5dd856 ("net: fix use-after-free when
> > UDP GRO with shared fraglist").
> >
> > If the GSO skb goes though skb_clone() and pskb_expand_head() before
> > entering skb_segment_list(), the latter  will unshare the frag_list
> > skbs and will release the old list. With the reverted commit in place,
> > when skb_segment_list() completes, skb->next points to the just
> > released list, and later on the kernel will hit UaF.
> 
> In that case, is "nskb->next = list_skb" needed before jumpping to
> error when __skb_linearize() fails? As there is "nskb->next = list_skb"
> before jumpping to error handling when skb_clone() fails.
> 
> The inconsistency above is the reason I sent the reverted patch:)

Yes, It is needed. skb_clone clears the next pointer.

> 
> >
> > Note that since commit e0e3070a9bc9 ("udp: properly complete L4 GRO
> > over UDP tunnel packet") the critical scenario can be reproduced also
> > receiving UDP over vxlan traffic with:
> >
> > NIC (NETIF_F_GRO_FRAGLIST enabled) -> vxlan -> UDP sink
> >
> > Attaching a packet socket to the NIC will cause skb_clone() and the
> > tunnel decapsulation will call pskb_expand_head().
> >
> > Fixes: 1ddc3229ad3c ("skbuff: remove some unnecessary operation in skb_segment_list()")
> > Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  net/core/skbuff.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> > index 3ad9e8425ab2..14010c0eec48 100644
> > --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> > +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> > @@ -3773,13 +3773,13 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment_list(struct sk_buff *skb,
> >  	unsigned int tnl_hlen = skb_tnl_header_len(skb);
> >  	unsigned int delta_truesize = 0;
> >  	unsigned int delta_len = 0;
> > +	struct sk_buff *tail = NULL;
> >  	struct sk_buff *nskb, *tmp;
> >  	int err;
> >
> >  	skb_push(skb, -skb_network_offset(skb) + offset);
> >
> >  	skb_shinfo(skb)->frag_list = NULL;
> > -	skb->next = list_skb;
> >
> >  	do {
> >  		nskb = list_skb;
> > @@ -3797,8 +3797,17 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment_list(struct sk_buff *skb,
> >  			}
> >  		}
> >
> > -		if (unlikely(err))
> > +		if (!tail)
> > +			skb->next = nskb;
> > +		else
> > +			tail->next = nskb;
> > +
> > +		if (unlikely(err)) {
> > +			nskb->next = list_skb;
> >  			goto err_linearize;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		tail = nskb;
> >
> >  		delta_len += nskb->len;
> >  		delta_truesize += nskb->truesize;
> > @@ -3825,7 +3834,7 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment_list(struct sk_buff *skb,
> >
> >  	skb_gso_reset(skb);
> >
> > -	skb->prev = nskb;
> > +	skb->prev = tail;
> >
> >  	if (skb_needs_linearize(skb, features) &&
> >  	    __skb_linearize(skb))
> >



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-04-15  4:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-04-14 10:48 [PATCH net-next] skbuff: revert "skbuff: remove some unnecessary operation in skb_segment_list()" Paolo Abeni
2021-04-14 21:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2021-04-15  2:23 ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-04-15  4:10   ` Dongseok Yi

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.