From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Wilck Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 41/42] libmultipath: refuse reloading an existing map with different WWID Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 09:51:10 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20200812113405.26206-1-mwilck@suse.com> <20200812113405.26206-3-mwilck@suse.com> <20200813222359.GY19233@octiron.msp.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: Benjamin Marzinski Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com List-Id: dm-devel.ids On Fri, 2020-08-14 at 09:48 +0200, Martin Wilck wrote: > Hi Ben, > > On Thu, 2020-08-13 at 17:23 -0500, Benjamin Marzinski wrote: > > > > I'm > > also open to convinced that it would be o.k. to rename a device > > that > > we > > weren't planing on reloading, because it has a wrong alias, which > > messes > > with the device that we were supposed to reload (I assume this > > makes > > the > > code easier). Does that sound like a reasonable solution? > > I sounds ok. s/I/It/ - sorry.