From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>,
Jonathan Zhang <zjzhang@codeaurora.org>,
Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/2] Fixes for ACPI BERT table
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:20:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1498065055.git.tony.luck@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170619155854.gtcowx3cityb3gqt@pd.tnic>
From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
At Boris' suggestion I've split this into two parts for version 5.
First one stops the driver from clearing the block_status field as:
1) it is unnecessary
2) not mentioned in the spec
3) may upset user mode tools that extract information from the BERT table.
Second is the code simplification that you've seen before in ealier
versions of this patch.
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>
Cc: Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang <zjzhang@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Tony Luck (2):
ACPI / APEI / BERT: Don't clear "block_status" in header
ACPI / APEI: Boot Error Record Table processing was needlessly
complicated
drivers/acpi/apei/bert.c | 59 ++++++++++--------------------------------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
--
2.11.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-21 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-15 22:41 [PATCH v4] ACPI / APEI: Boot Error Record Table processing was needlessly complicated Luck, Tony
2017-06-19 15:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-06-21 17:20 ` Luck, Tony [this message]
2017-06-21 17:20 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] ACPI / APEI / BERT: Don't clear "block_status" in header Luck, Tony
2017-06-21 17:20 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] ACPI / APEI: Boot Error Record Table processing was needlessly complicated Luck, Tony
2017-06-28 16:38 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] Fixes for ACPI BERT table Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1498065055.git.tony.luck@intel.com \
--to=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=tbaicar@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=zjzhang@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.