* [PATCH 0/2] Solve a few issues with intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c
@ 2020-05-12 5:51 Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-05-12 5:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] ACPI / PMIC: Add i2c address for thermal control Mauro Carvalho Chehab
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab @ 2020-05-12 5:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab, linux-acpi, Len Brown, Mika Westerberg,
Andy Shevchenko, Lee Jones, Rafael J. Wysocki
While doing some tests with a device that I'm using to work with the
atomisp driver (an Asus T101HA), I noticed some warnings produced
by the i915 driver.
The first one is that building intel_pmic_chtdc_ti as a module is too
late, as fbcon driver (and i915) will need it earlier.
The second one is that the thermal I2C OpRegion needed by the i915
is not registered.
Those patches address the issues I detected.
Mauro Carvalho Chehab (2):
ACPI / PMIC: Add i2c address for thermal control
mfd: Kconfig: change INTEL_SOC_PMIC_CHTDC_TI to bool
drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c | 1 +
drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 6 +++++-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] ACPI / PMIC: Add i2c address for thermal control
2020-05-12 5:51 [PATCH 0/2] Solve a few issues with intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c Mauro Carvalho Chehab
@ 2020-05-12 5:51 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-05-12 7:45 ` Hans de Goede
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab @ 2020-05-12 5:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown,
Andy Shevchenko, Mika Westerberg, linux-acpi, Hans de Goede
On Asus T101HA, we keep receiving those error messages:
i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* mipi_exec_pmic failed, error: -95
intel_soc_pmic_exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element: Not implemented
intel_soc_pmic_exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element: i2c-addr: 0x5e reg-addr 0x4b value 0x59 mask 0xff
Because the opregion is missing the I2C address.
Suggested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
---
drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c b/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c
index 7ccd7d9660bc..a5101b07611a 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c
@@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ static struct intel_pmic_opregion_data chtdc_ti_pmic_opregion_data = {
.power_table_count = ARRAY_SIZE(chtdc_ti_power_table),
.thermal_table = chtdc_ti_thermal_table,
.thermal_table_count = ARRAY_SIZE(chtdc_ti_thermal_table),
+ .pmic_i2c_address = 0x5e,
};
static int chtdc_ti_pmic_opregion_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI / PMIC: Add i2c address for thermal control
2020-05-12 5:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] ACPI / PMIC: Add i2c address for thermal control Mauro Carvalho Chehab
@ 2020-05-12 7:45 ` Hans de Goede
2020-05-12 8:48 ` Mika Westerberg
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Hans de Goede @ 2020-05-12 7:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, Andy Shevchenko, Mika Westerberg,
linux-acpi
Hi,
On 5/12/20 7:51 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> On Asus T101HA, we keep receiving those error messages:
>
> i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* mipi_exec_pmic failed, error: -95
> intel_soc_pmic_exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element: Not implemented
> intel_soc_pmic_exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element: i2c-addr: 0x5e reg-addr 0x4b value 0x59 mask 0xff
>
> Because the opregion is missing the I2C address.
>
> Suggested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Regards,
Hans
> ---
> drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c b/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c
> index 7ccd7d9660bc..a5101b07611a 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c
> @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ static struct intel_pmic_opregion_data chtdc_ti_pmic_opregion_data = {
> .power_table_count = ARRAY_SIZE(chtdc_ti_power_table),
> .thermal_table = chtdc_ti_thermal_table,
> .thermal_table_count = ARRAY_SIZE(chtdc_ti_thermal_table),
> + .pmic_i2c_address = 0x5e,
> };
>
> static int chtdc_ti_pmic_opregion_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI / PMIC: Add i2c address for thermal control
2020-05-12 5:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] ACPI / PMIC: Add i2c address for thermal control Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-05-12 7:45 ` Hans de Goede
@ 2020-05-12 8:48 ` Mika Westerberg
2020-05-12 9:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-05-15 16:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mika Westerberg @ 2020-05-12 8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, Andy Shevchenko, linux-acpi, Hans de Goede
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 07:51:56AM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> On Asus T101HA, we keep receiving those error messages:
>
> i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* mipi_exec_pmic failed, error: -95
> intel_soc_pmic_exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element: Not implemented
> intel_soc_pmic_exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element: i2c-addr: 0x5e reg-addr 0x4b value 0x59 mask 0xff
>
> Because the opregion is missing the I2C address.
>
> Suggested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI / PMIC: Add i2c address for thermal control
2020-05-12 5:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] ACPI / PMIC: Add i2c address for thermal control Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-05-12 7:45 ` Hans de Goede
2020-05-12 8:48 ` Mika Westerberg
@ 2020-05-12 9:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-05-15 16:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2020-05-12 9:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, Mika Westerberg, linux-acpi, Hans de Goede
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 07:51:56AM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> On Asus T101HA, we keep receiving those error messages:
>
> i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* mipi_exec_pmic failed, error: -95
> intel_soc_pmic_exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element: Not implemented
> intel_soc_pmic_exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element: i2c-addr: 0x5e reg-addr 0x4b value 0x59 mask 0xff
>
> Because the opregion is missing the I2C address.
>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c b/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c
> index 7ccd7d9660bc..a5101b07611a 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c
> @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ static struct intel_pmic_opregion_data chtdc_ti_pmic_opregion_data = {
> .power_table_count = ARRAY_SIZE(chtdc_ti_power_table),
> .thermal_table = chtdc_ti_thermal_table,
> .thermal_table_count = ARRAY_SIZE(chtdc_ti_thermal_table),
> + .pmic_i2c_address = 0x5e,
> };
>
> static int chtdc_ti_pmic_opregion_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> --
> 2.26.2
>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI / PMIC: Add i2c address for thermal control
2020-05-12 5:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] ACPI / PMIC: Add i2c address for thermal control Mauro Carvalho Chehab
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-05-12 9:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
@ 2020-05-15 16:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-05-18 7:22 ` Hans de Goede
3 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2020-05-15 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, Andy Shevchenko, Mika Westerberg,
ACPI Devel Maling List, Hans de Goede
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 7:52 AM Mauro Carvalho Chehab
<mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Asus T101HA, we keep receiving those error messages:
>
> i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* mipi_exec_pmic failed, error: -95
> intel_soc_pmic_exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element: Not implemented
> intel_soc_pmic_exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element: i2c-addr: 0x5e reg-addr 0x4b value 0x59 mask 0xff
>
> Because the opregion is missing the I2C address.
>
> Suggested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c b/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c
> index 7ccd7d9660bc..a5101b07611a 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c
> @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ static struct intel_pmic_opregion_data chtdc_ti_pmic_opregion_data = {
> .power_table_count = ARRAY_SIZE(chtdc_ti_power_table),
> .thermal_table = chtdc_ti_thermal_table,
> .thermal_table_count = ARRAY_SIZE(chtdc_ti_thermal_table),
> + .pmic_i2c_address = 0x5e,
> };
>
> static int chtdc_ti_pmic_opregion_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> --
This appears to be part of a series, but the second patch has not been
CCed to linux-acpi.
Can I assume that this one will be applied along with the [2/2] by
another maintainer?
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI / PMIC: Add i2c address for thermal control
2020-05-15 16:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2020-05-18 7:22 ` Hans de Goede
2020-05-18 8:18 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Hans de Goede @ 2020-05-18 7:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, Andy Shevchenko, Mika Westerberg,
ACPI Devel Maling List
Hi Rafael,
On 5/15/20 6:28 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 7:52 AM Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Asus T101HA, we keep receiving those error messages:
>>
>> i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* mipi_exec_pmic failed, error: -95
>> intel_soc_pmic_exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element: Not implemented
>> intel_soc_pmic_exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element: i2c-addr: 0x5e reg-addr 0x4b value 0x59 mask 0xff
>>
>> Because the opregion is missing the I2C address.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c b/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c
>> index 7ccd7d9660bc..a5101b07611a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c
>> @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ static struct intel_pmic_opregion_data chtdc_ti_pmic_opregion_data = {
>> .power_table_count = ARRAY_SIZE(chtdc_ti_power_table),
>> .thermal_table = chtdc_ti_thermal_table,
>> .thermal_table_count = ARRAY_SIZE(chtdc_ti_thermal_table),
>> + .pmic_i2c_address = 0x5e,
>> };
>>
>> static int chtdc_ti_pmic_opregion_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> --
>
> This appears to be part of a series, but the second patch has not been
> CCed to linux-acpi.
Mauro send out 3 patches related to the PMIC, this one and 2 MFD patches.
I think his intention was to send out this standalone and the 2 MFD patches
as a series, but instead he send out this 1 + 1 MFD patch as a series and
the other MFD patch as a standalone patch.
Either way this patch is a standalone patch, the 2/2 patch is almost
completely unrelated, so if you can pick this one up, then that would be
great.
Regards,
Hans
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI / PMIC: Add i2c address for thermal control
2020-05-18 7:22 ` Hans de Goede
@ 2020-05-18 8:18 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-05-18 11:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab @ 2020-05-18 8:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hans de Goede
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, Andy Shevchenko,
Mika Westerberg, ACPI Devel Maling List
Em Mon, 18 May 2020 09:22:53 +0200
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> escreveu:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On 5/15/20 6:28 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 7:52 AM Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> > <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Asus T101HA, we keep receiving those error messages:
> >>
> >> i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* mipi_exec_pmic failed, error: -95
> >> intel_soc_pmic_exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element: Not implemented
> >> intel_soc_pmic_exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element: i2c-addr: 0x5e reg-addr 0x4b value 0x59 mask 0xff
> >>
> >> Because the opregion is missing the I2C address.
> >>
> >> Suggested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c | 1 +
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c b/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c
> >> index 7ccd7d9660bc..a5101b07611a 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c
> >> @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ static struct intel_pmic_opregion_data chtdc_ti_pmic_opregion_data = {
> >> .power_table_count = ARRAY_SIZE(chtdc_ti_power_table),
> >> .thermal_table = chtdc_ti_thermal_table,
> >> .thermal_table_count = ARRAY_SIZE(chtdc_ti_thermal_table),
> >> + .pmic_i2c_address = 0x5e,
> >> };
> >>
> >> static int chtdc_ti_pmic_opregion_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> --
> >
> > This appears to be part of a series, but the second patch has not been
> > CCed to linux-acpi.
>
> Mauro send out 3 patches related to the PMIC, this one and 2 MFD patches.
> I think his intention was to send out this standalone and the 2 MFD patches
> as a series, but instead he send out this 1 + 1 MFD patch as a series and
> the other MFD patch as a standalone patch.
>
> Either way this patch is a standalone patch, the 2/2 patch is almost
> completely unrelated, so if you can pick this one up, then that would be
> great.
Yeah, patch 2/2 is independent of this one. It touches only drivers/mfd/Kconfig,
addressing a problem when building with INTEL_SOC_PMIC_CHTDC_TI=m.
The third patch for the MFD tree addresses similar issues with drivers that
register an OpRegion, but won't work properly if compiled as module.
Please pick this one via your tree. The other two patches should probably
go via MFD tree.
Thanks,
Mauro
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI / PMIC: Add i2c address for thermal control
2020-05-18 8:18 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
@ 2020-05-18 11:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2020-05-18 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Cc: Hans de Goede, Rafael J. Wysocki, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown,
Andy Shevchenko, Mika Westerberg, ACPI Devel Maling List
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 10:18 AM Mauro Carvalho Chehab
<mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Em Mon, 18 May 2020 09:22:53 +0200
> Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> escreveu:
>
> > Hi Rafael,
> >
> > On 5/15/20 6:28 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 7:52 AM Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> > > <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Asus T101HA, we keep receiving those error messages:
> > >>
> > >> i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* mipi_exec_pmic failed, error: -95
> > >> intel_soc_pmic_exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element: Not implemented
> > >> intel_soc_pmic_exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element: i2c-addr: 0x5e reg-addr 0x4b value 0x59 mask 0xff
> > >>
> > >> Because the opregion is missing the I2C address.
> > >>
> > >> Suggested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
> > >> ---
> > >> drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c | 1 +
> > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c b/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c
> > >> index 7ccd7d9660bc..a5101b07611a 100644
> > >> --- a/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c
> > >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c
> > >> @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ static struct intel_pmic_opregion_data chtdc_ti_pmic_opregion_data = {
> > >> .power_table_count = ARRAY_SIZE(chtdc_ti_power_table),
> > >> .thermal_table = chtdc_ti_thermal_table,
> > >> .thermal_table_count = ARRAY_SIZE(chtdc_ti_thermal_table),
> > >> + .pmic_i2c_address = 0x5e,
> > >> };
> > >>
> > >> static int chtdc_ti_pmic_opregion_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >> --
> > >
> > > This appears to be part of a series, but the second patch has not been
> > > CCed to linux-acpi.
> >
> > Mauro send out 3 patches related to the PMIC, this one and 2 MFD patches.
> > I think his intention was to send out this standalone and the 2 MFD patches
> > as a series, but instead he send out this 1 + 1 MFD patch as a series and
> > the other MFD patch as a standalone patch.
> >
> > Either way this patch is a standalone patch, the 2/2 patch is almost
> > completely unrelated, so if you can pick this one up, then that would be
> > great.
>
> Yeah, patch 2/2 is independent of this one. It touches only drivers/mfd/Kconfig,
> addressing a problem when building with INTEL_SOC_PMIC_CHTDC_TI=m.
>
> The third patch for the MFD tree addresses similar issues with drivers that
> register an OpRegion, but won't work properly if compiled as module.
>
> Please pick this one via your tree.
OK, applied as 5.8 material, thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-05-18 11:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-05-12 5:51 [PATCH 0/2] Solve a few issues with intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-05-12 5:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] ACPI / PMIC: Add i2c address for thermal control Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-05-12 7:45 ` Hans de Goede
2020-05-12 8:48 ` Mika Westerberg
2020-05-12 9:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-05-15 16:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-05-18 7:22 ` Hans de Goede
2020-05-18 8:18 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-05-18 11:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.