All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/4] x86/uaccess: Use pointer masking to limit uaccess speculation
Date: Tue,  4 May 2021 22:54:28 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1620186182.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com> (raw)

This one managed to fall through the cracks back in September.  Here's a
fresh new version.

Ideally, we'd switch all access_ok() users to access_ok_mask() or
something, but that's a much bigger change.

I dropped all the ack/review tags because the rebase was significant.

Please review carefully :-)


v4 changes:

- Rebased on the latest.

- Split up into multiple logical patches.

- Renamed "force_user_ptr()" -> "mask_user_ptr()" to prevent confusing
  it with '__force' casting.  [based on Dan's comment]

- Instead of reusing array_index_nospec(), made a new separate inline
  asm statement.  Otherwise it fails the build on recent toolchains
  and/or kernels because the "g" constraint in array_index_mask_nospec()
  isn't big enough for TASK_SIZE_MAX.  I could have changed "g" to "r",
  but that would negatively impact code generation for the other users.


v3 was here:

  https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1d06ed6485b66b9f674900368b63d7ef79f666ca.1599756789.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com/


Josh Poimboeuf (4):
  uaccess: Always inline strn*_user() helper functions
  uaccess: Fix __user annotations for copy_mc_to_user()
  x86/uaccess: Use pointer masking to limit uaccess speculation
  x86/nospec: Remove barrier_nospec()

 Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/spectre.rst |  6 +--
 arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h                |  3 --
 arch/x86/include/asm/futex.h                  |  5 ++
 arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h                | 48 +++++++++++++------
 arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h             | 12 ++---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/virt.c                |  6 ++-
 arch/x86/lib/copy_mc.c                        | 10 ++--
 arch/x86/lib/csum-wrappers_64.c               |  5 +-
 arch/x86/lib/getuser.S                        | 16 ++-----
 arch/x86/lib/putuser.S                        |  8 ++++
 arch/x86/lib/usercopy_32.c                    |  6 +--
 arch/x86/lib/usercopy_64.c                    |  7 +--
 lib/iov_iter.c                                |  2 +-
 lib/strncpy_from_user.c                       |  6 ++-
 lib/strnlen_user.c                            |  4 +-
 15 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

-- 
2.31.1


             reply	other threads:[~2021-05-05  3:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-05  3:54 Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2021-05-05  3:54 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] uaccess: Always inline strn*_user() helper functions Josh Poimboeuf
2021-05-05  3:54 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] uaccess: Fix __user annotations for copy_mc_to_user() Josh Poimboeuf
2021-05-05  3:54 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] x86/uaccess: Use pointer masking to limit uaccess speculation Josh Poimboeuf
2021-05-05  8:48   ` David Laight
2021-05-05 13:19     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-05-05 13:51       ` David Laight
2021-05-05 18:32     ` Linus Torvalds
2021-05-06  7:57       ` David Laight
2021-05-05 14:25   ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-05 14:48     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-05-05 14:49     ` David Laight
2021-05-05 15:45       ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-05 16:55   ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-05-06  8:36     ` David Laight
2021-05-06 12:05       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-02 17:11   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-02 20:11     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-05-05  3:54 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] x86/nospec: Remove barrier_nospec() Josh Poimboeuf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cover.1620186182.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.