All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed@amazon.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Jim Mattson" <jmattson@google.com>, "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] X86/KVM: Properly restore 'tsc_offset' when running an L2 guest
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 18:35:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d03d253a-d184-4c95-91b2-45e94659b9bd@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1523545958-28059-1-git-send-email-karahmed@amazon.de>

On 12/04/2018 17:12, KarimAllah Ahmed wrote:
> When the TSC MSR is captured while an L2 guest is running then restored,
> the 'tsc_offset' ends up capturing the L02 TSC_OFFSET instead of the L01
> TSC_OFFSET. So ensure that this is compensated for when storing the value.
> 
> Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed@amazon.de>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 12 +++++++++---
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c |  1 -
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index cff2f50..2f57571 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -2900,6 +2900,8 @@ static u64 guest_read_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   */
>  static void vmx_write_tsc_offset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 offset)
>  {
> +	u64 l1_tsc_offset = 0;
> +
>  	if (is_guest_mode(vcpu)) {
>  		/*
>  		 * We're here if L1 chose not to trap WRMSR to TSC. According
> @@ -2908,16 +2910,20 @@ static void vmx_write_tsc_offset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 offset)
>  		 * to the newly set TSC to get L2's TSC.
>  		 */
>  		struct vmcs12 *vmcs12;
> +
>  		/* recalculate vmcs02.TSC_OFFSET: */
>  		vmcs12 = get_vmcs12(vcpu);
> -		vmcs_write64(TSC_OFFSET, offset +
> -			(nested_cpu_has(vmcs12, CPU_BASED_USE_TSC_OFFSETING) ?
> -			 vmcs12->tsc_offset : 0));
> +
> +		l1_tsc_offset = nested_cpu_has(vmcs12, CPU_BASED_USE_TSC_OFFSETING) ?
> +					vmcs12->tsc_offset : 0;
> +		vmcs_write64(TSC_OFFSET, offset + l1_tsc_offset);
>  	} else {
>  		trace_kvm_write_tsc_offset(vcpu->vcpu_id,
>  					   vmcs_read64(TSC_OFFSET), offset);
>  		vmcs_write64(TSC_OFFSET, offset);
>  	}
> +
> +	vcpu->arch.tsc_offset = offset - l1_tsc_offset;

Using both "offset + l1_tsc_offset" and "offset - l1_tsc_offset" in this 
function seems wrong to me: if vcpu->arch.tsc_offset must be "offset - 
l1_tsc_offset", then "offset" must be written to TSC_OFFSET.

I think the bug was introduced by commit 3e3f50262.  Before,
vmx_read_tsc_offset returned the L02 offset; now it always contains the
L01 offset.  So the right fix is to adjust vcpu->arch.tsc_offset on
nested vmentry/vmexit.  If is_guest_mode(vcpu), kvm_read_l1_tsc must use
a new kvm_x86_ops callback to subtract the L12 offset from the value it
returns.

Thanks,

Paolo

>  }
>  
>  /*
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index ac42c85..1a2ed92 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -1539,7 +1539,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_read_l1_tsc);
>  static void kvm_vcpu_write_tsc_offset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 offset)
>  {
>  	kvm_x86_ops->write_tsc_offset(vcpu, offset);
> -	vcpu->arch.tsc_offset = offset;
>  }
>  
>  static inline bool kvm_check_tsc_unstable(void)
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-04-12 16:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-12 15:12 [PATCH 1/2] X86/KVM: Properly restore 'tsc_offset' when running an L2 guest KarimAllah Ahmed
2018-04-12 15:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] kvm: nVMX: Introduce KVM_CAP_STATE KarimAllah Ahmed
2018-04-12 16:39   ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-04-14 15:56   ` Raslan, KarimAllah
2018-04-14 22:31     ` Raslan, KarimAllah
2018-04-16 16:22   ` Jim Mattson
2018-04-16 17:15     ` Raslan, KarimAllah
2018-04-26 22:28       ` Jim Mattson
2018-04-27 10:03         ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-04-27 15:19           ` Jim Mattson
2018-04-28  0:42             ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-04-12 16:35 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2018-04-12 17:04   ` [PATCH 1/2] X86/KVM: Properly restore 'tsc_offset' when running an L2 guest Raslan, KarimAllah
2018-04-12 17:21     ` Raslan, KarimAllah
2018-04-12 20:21       ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-04-12 20:24         ` Raslan, KarimAllah

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d03d253a-d184-4c95-91b2-45e94659b9bd@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=karahmed@amazon.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.