All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: Do first key check under proper lock context
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 19:48:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d06cfef4-a16f-3335-2500-4d932604147c@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d87827bd-5e04-5d40-a2e9-d7745691efff@suse.com>



On 2018年04月12日 18:59, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> 
> 
> On 12.04.2018 13:00, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> The original first key check is handled in
>> btree_read_extent_buffer_pages(), which is good enough for level check,
>> but to verify first key, we need at least read lock on the extent
>> buffer, or we can hit some race and cause false alert.
>>
>> Fix it by adding new verifcation function: btrfs_verify_first_key(),
>> which will first check lock context of both parent and child extent
>> buffer, and only when we have proper lock hold (write or read lock if
> So if the extent buffer is not in commit root, i.e it's active buffer in
> current transaction (am I right?)

That's right.

> then we need write lock? It's not entirely clearly from that sentence.

Not really write lock. Either read or write (both spinning and blocking)
is OK here.

> 
>> extent buffer is not in commit root) we will verify the first key.
>>
>> Most of the verification happens in ctree.c after function call like
>> read_tree_block(), read_node_slot() and read_block_for_search(), and
>> only call btrfs_verify_first_key() after we acquire read/write lock.
>>
>> Also, since first_key check is not as good as level and could easily
>> trigger false alerts due to lock context, put it under
>> CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_CHECK_INTEGRITY to avoid damage to end user.
> 
> Why is first_key check not as good as level

Several reasons.

1) Level tree check can prevent loop/nodes underflow caused by level
   mismatch, but first_key can't
   One problem we're trying to solve is, when level 1 node points to
   another level 1 tree, we can still try to read next level tree block.
   Which could underflow level.
   first_key check can't really handle it.

2) first_key needs extra lock to read out needed info, while level
   check doesn't (hence easier and harder to cause false alert)
   For a given tree block, its level won't change either for active eb
   (modified in current trans) or committed eb.
   But for first_key, we need proper lock to avoid race.

For short, first key check needs a lot of carefully reviewed check
timing and error handlers, while most problem could be exposed by level
check far before it hits first_key check.

> and why could it trigger
> false alert, given this patch allegedly implements it under proper lock
> context, thus eliminating false positives.

I mean the old and merged first_key check patch.

Thanks,
Qu

> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
>> ---
>>  fs/btrfs/ctree.c       | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  fs/btrfs/ctree.h       | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c |  6 ++++
>>  fs/btrfs/qgroup.c      |  5 +++
>>  fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c  |  6 ++++
>>  fs/btrfs/relocation.c  | 13 ++++++++
>>  6 files changed, 157 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
>> index e044b51a2789..57721aead371 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
>> @@ -1649,6 +1649,11 @@ int btrfs_realloc_node(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>>  
>>  		btrfs_tree_lock(cur);
>>  		btrfs_set_lock_blocking(cur);
>> +		if (btrfs_verify_first_key(cur, parent, i)) {
>> +			err = -EUCLEAN;
>> +			btrfs_tree_unlock(cur);
>> +			free_extent_buffer(cur);
>> +		}
>>  		err = __btrfs_cow_block(trans, root, cur, parent, i,
>>  					&cur, search_start,
>>  					min(16 * blocksize,
>> @@ -1863,6 +1868,12 @@ static noinline int balance_level(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>>  
>>  		btrfs_tree_lock(child);
>>  		btrfs_set_lock_blocking(child);
>> +		if (btrfs_verify_first_key(child, mid, 0)) {
>> +			ret = -EUCLEAN;
>> +			btrfs_tree_unlock(child);
>> +			free_extent_buffer(child);
>> +			goto enospc;
>> +		}
>>  		ret = btrfs_cow_block(trans, root, child, mid, 0, &child);
>>  		if (ret) {
>>  			btrfs_tree_unlock(child);
>> @@ -1901,6 +1912,10 @@ static noinline int balance_level(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>>  	if (left) {
>>  		btrfs_tree_lock(left);
>>  		btrfs_set_lock_blocking(left);
>> +		if (btrfs_verify_first_key(left, parent, pslot - 1)) {
>> +			ret = -EUCLEAN;
>> +			goto enospc;
>> +		}
>>  		wret = btrfs_cow_block(trans, root, left,
>>  				       parent, pslot - 1, &left);
>>  		if (wret) {
>> @@ -1916,6 +1931,10 @@ static noinline int balance_level(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>>  	if (right) {
>>  		btrfs_tree_lock(right);
>>  		btrfs_set_lock_blocking(right);
>> +		if (btrfs_verify_first_key(right, parent, pslot + 1)) {
>> +			ret = -EUCLEAN;
>> +			goto enospc;
>> +		}
>>  		wret = btrfs_cow_block(trans, root, right,
>>  				       parent, pslot + 1, &right);
>>  		if (wret) {
>> @@ -2079,6 +2098,8 @@ static noinline int push_nodes_for_insert(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>>  
>>  		btrfs_tree_lock(left);
>>  		btrfs_set_lock_blocking(left);
>> +		if (btrfs_verify_first_key(left, parent, pslot - 1))
>> +			goto left_out;
>>  
>>  		left_nr = btrfs_header_nritems(left);
>>  		if (left_nr >= BTRFS_NODEPTRS_PER_BLOCK(fs_info) - 1) {
>> @@ -2119,6 +2140,7 @@ static noinline int push_nodes_for_insert(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>>  			}
>>  			return 0;
>>  		}
>> +left_out:
>>  		btrfs_tree_unlock(left);
>>  		free_extent_buffer(left);
>>  	}
>> @@ -2134,6 +2156,8 @@ static noinline int push_nodes_for_insert(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>>  
>>  		btrfs_tree_lock(right);
>>  		btrfs_set_lock_blocking(right);
>> +		if (btrfs_verify_first_key(right, parent, pslot + 1))
>> +			goto right_out;
>>  
>>  		right_nr = btrfs_header_nritems(right);
>>  		if (right_nr >= BTRFS_NODEPTRS_PER_BLOCK(fs_info) - 1) {
>> @@ -2174,6 +2198,7 @@ static noinline int push_nodes_for_insert(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>>  			}
>>  			return 0;
>>  		}
>> +right_out:
>>  		btrfs_tree_unlock(right);
>>  		free_extent_buffer(right);
>>  	}
>> @@ -2868,6 +2893,11 @@ int btrfs_search_slot(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root *root,
>>  					p->locks[level] = BTRFS_READ_LOCK;
>>  				}
>>  				p->nodes[level] = b;
>> +				if (btrfs_verify_first_key(b, p->nodes[level + 1],
>> +							   slot)) {
>> +					ret = -EUCLEAN;
>> +					goto done;
>> +				}
>>  			}
>>  		} else {
>>  			p->slots[level] = slot;
>> @@ -2981,6 +3011,12 @@ int btrfs_search_old_slot(struct btrfs_root *root, const struct btrfs_key *key,
>>  				goto done;
>>  			}
>>  
>> +			/*
>> +			 * NOTE: both parent and child go through
>> +			 * tree_mod_log_rewind(), first key check is no
>> +			 * longer consistent. So no btrfs_verify_first_key()
>> +			 * for this read_block_for_search().
>> +			 */
>>  			err = read_block_for_search(root, p, &b, level,
>>  						    slot, key);
>>  			if (err == -EAGAIN)
>> @@ -3753,6 +3789,8 @@ static int push_leaf_right(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root
>>  
>>  	btrfs_tree_lock(right);
>>  	btrfs_set_lock_blocking(right);
>> +	if (btrfs_verify_first_key(right, upper, slot + 1))
>> +		goto out_unlock;
>>  
>>  	free_space = btrfs_leaf_free_space(fs_info, right);
>>  	if (free_space < data_size)
>> @@ -3987,6 +4025,10 @@ static int push_leaf_left(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root
>>  
>>  	btrfs_tree_lock(left);
>>  	btrfs_set_lock_blocking(left);
>> +	if (btrfs_verify_first_key(left, path->nodes[1], slot - 1)) {
>> +		ret = 1;
>> +		goto out;
>> +	}
>>  
>>  	free_space = btrfs_leaf_free_space(fs_info, left);
>>  	if (free_space < data_size) {
>> @@ -5205,6 +5247,12 @@ int btrfs_search_forward(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_key *min_key,
>>  		}
>>  
>>  		btrfs_tree_read_lock(cur);
>> +		if (btrfs_verify_first_key(cur, path->nodes[level], slot)) {
>> +			btrfs_tree_read_unlock(cur);
>> +			free_extent_buffer(cur);
>> +			ret = -EUCLEAN;
>> +			goto out;
>> +		}
>>  
>>  		path->locks[level - 1] = BTRFS_READ_LOCK;
>>  		path->nodes[level - 1] = cur;
>> @@ -5232,6 +5280,11 @@ static int tree_move_down(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>>  	if (IS_ERR(eb))
>>  		return PTR_ERR(eb);
>>  
>> +	if (btrfs_verify_first_key(eb, path->nodes[*level],
>> +				   path->slots[*level])) {
>> +		free_extent_buffer(eb);
>> +		return -EUCLEAN;
>> +	}
>>  	path->nodes[*level - 1] = eb;
>>  	path->slots[*level - 1] = 0;
>>  	(*level)--;
>> @@ -5786,6 +5839,14 @@ int btrfs_next_old_leaf(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_path *path,
>>  							  BTRFS_READ_LOCK);
>>  			}
>>  			next_rw_lock = BTRFS_READ_LOCK;
>> +			if (btrfs_verify_first_key(next, path->nodes[level],
>> +						   slot)) {
>> +				ret = -EUCLEAN;
>> +				btrfs_tree_read_unlock(next);
>> +				free_extent_buffer(next);
>> +				btrfs_release_path(path);
>> +				goto done;
>> +			}
>>  		}
>>  		break;
>>  	}
>> @@ -5823,6 +5884,14 @@ int btrfs_next_old_leaf(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_path *path,
>>  							  BTRFS_READ_LOCK);
>>  			}
>>  			next_rw_lock = BTRFS_READ_LOCK;
>> +			if (btrfs_verify_first_key(next, path->nodes[level],
>> +						   0)) {
>> +				ret = -EUCLEAN;
>> +				btrfs_tree_read_unlock(next);
>> +				free_extent_buffer(next);
>> +				btrfs_release_path(path);
>> +				goto done;
>> +			}
>>  		}
>>  	}
>>  	ret = 0;
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
>> index 0eb55825862a..033d8ae027c3 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
>> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
>>  #include "extent_io.h"
>>  #include "extent_map.h"
>>  #include "async-thread.h"
>> +#include "print-tree.h"
>>  
>>  struct btrfs_trans_handle;
>>  struct btrfs_transaction;
>> @@ -3752,4 +3753,61 @@ static inline int btrfs_is_testing(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
>>  #endif
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Verify the first key of an extent buffer matches with its parent pointer.
>> + *
>> + * For tree blocks in current transaction, caller should hold at least read lock
>> + * for both @eb and @parent to avoid race.
>> + * While for tree blocks in commit root, no such requirement.
>> + */
>> +static inline int btrfs_verify_first_key(struct extent_buffer *eb,
>> +					 struct extent_buffer *parent, int slot)
>> +{
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_CHECK_INTEGRITY
>> +	struct btrfs_key parent_key;
>> +	struct btrfs_key found_key;
>> +	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info;
>> +	u64 transid = 0;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	if (!parent || !eb)
>> +		return 0;
>> +	fs_info = parent->fs_info;
>> +	transid = fs_info->last_trans_committed;
>> +	/*
>> +	 * For first_key check, we need to ensure we have proper lock hold,
>> +	 * or the content may change and cause false alert.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (btrfs_header_generation(eb) > transid &&
>> +	    !atomic_read(&eb->read_locks) && !atomic_read(&eb->write_locks)) {
>> +		WARN_ON(1);
>> +		return 0;
>> +	}
>> +	if (btrfs_header_generation(parent) > transid &&
>> +	    !atomic_read(&parent->read_locks) &&
>> +	    !atomic_read(&parent->write_locks)) {
>> +		WARN_ON(1);
>> +		return 0;
>> +	}
>> +	btrfs_node_key_to_cpu(parent, &parent_key, slot);
>> +	if (btrfs_header_level(eb))
>> +		btrfs_node_key_to_cpu(eb, &found_key, 0);
>> +	else
>> +		btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(eb, &found_key, 0);
>> +	ret =  btrfs_comp_cpu_keys(&found_key, &parent_key);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		WARN_ON(ret);
>> +		btrfs_err(fs_info,
>> +"tree first key mismatch detected, bytenr=%llu key expected=(%llu, %u, %llu) has=(%llu, %u, %llu)",
>> +			  eb->start, parent_key.objectid, parent_key.type,
>> +			  parent_key.offset, found_key.objectid,
>> +			  found_key.type, found_key.offset);
>> +	}
>> +	return ret;
>> +#else
>> +	return 0;
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_CHECK_INTEGRITY */
>> +}
>> +
>>  #endif
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
>> index f080834e4dd0..17bd22a54281 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
>> @@ -8807,6 +8807,12 @@ static noinline int do_walk_down(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>>  		}
>>  		btrfs_tree_lock(next);
>>  		btrfs_set_lock_blocking(next);
>> +		if (btrfs_verify_first_key(next, path->nodes[level],
>> +					   path->slots[level])) {
>> +			btrfs_tree_unlock(next);
>> +			free_extent_buffer(next);
>> +			goto out_unlock;
>> +		}
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	level--;
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
>> index c7f129356966..4c53954297d8 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
>> @@ -1744,6 +1744,11 @@ int btrfs_qgroup_trace_subtree(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>>  
>>  			btrfs_tree_read_lock(eb);
>>  			btrfs_set_lock_blocking_rw(eb, BTRFS_READ_LOCK);
>> +			if (btrfs_verify_first_key(eb, path->nodes[level + 1],
>> +						   parent_slot)) {
>> +				ret = -EUCLEAN;
>> +				goto out;
>> +			}
>>  			path->locks[level] = BTRFS_READ_LOCK_BLOCKING;
>>  
>>  			ret = btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent(trans, fs_info,
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c b/fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c
>> index 6d856eabf34a..b996ca1fd9dc 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c
>> @@ -593,6 +593,12 @@ static int walk_down_tree(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_path *path,
>>  			}
>>  			btrfs_tree_read_lock(eb);
>>  			btrfs_set_lock_blocking_rw(eb, BTRFS_READ_LOCK);
>> +			if (btrfs_verify_first_key(eb, path->nodes[level],
>> +			    path->slots[level])) {
>> +				btrfs_tree_read_unlock_blocking(eb);
>> +				free_extent_buffer(eb);
>> +				return -EUCLEAN;
>> +			}
>>  			path->nodes[level-1] = eb;
>>  			path->slots[level-1] = 0;
>>  			path->locks[level-1] = BTRFS_READ_LOCK_BLOCKING;
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
>> index 74db4694d776..74a088fbdac4 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
>> @@ -1888,6 +1888,13 @@ int replace_path(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>>  				break;
>>  			}
>>  			btrfs_tree_lock(eb);
>> +			if (btrfs_verify_first_key(eb, parent, slot)) {
>> +				btrfs_tree_unlock(eb);
>> +				free_extent_buffer(eb);
>> +				ret = -EUCLEAN;
>> +				break;
>> +			}
>> +
>>  			if (cow) {
>>  				ret = btrfs_cow_block(trans, dest, eb, parent,
>>  						      slot, &eb);
>> @@ -2793,6 +2800,12 @@ static int do_relocation(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>>  		}
>>  		btrfs_tree_lock(eb);
>>  		btrfs_set_lock_blocking(eb);
>> +		if (btrfs_verify_first_key(eb, upper->eb, slot)) {
>> +			btrfs_tree_unlock(eb);
>> +			free_extent_buffer(eb);
>> +			err = -EUCLEAN;
>> +			goto next;
>> +		}
>>  
>>  		if (!node->eb) {
>>  			ret = btrfs_cow_block(trans, root, eb, upper->eb,
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-12 11:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-12 10:00 [PATCH for 4.7-rc 1/2] btrfs: Remove first key verification since it's causing false alerts Qu Wenruo
2018-04-12 10:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: Do first key check under proper lock context Qu Wenruo
2018-04-12 10:59   ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-04-12 11:48     ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2018-04-12 11:56       ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-04-12 13:39   ` David Sterba
2018-04-12 13:35 ` [PATCH for 4.7-rc 1/2] btrfs: Remove first key verification since it's causing false alerts David Sterba
2018-04-12 13:56   ` Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d06cfef4-a16f-3335-2500-4d932604147c@gmx.com \
    --to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nborisov@suse.com \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.