From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73306C004C9 for ; Tue, 7 May 2019 05:57:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 412F32054F for ; Tue, 7 May 2019 05:57:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=rasmusvillemoes.dk header.i=@rasmusvillemoes.dk header.b="TDEjJvzc" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728667AbfEGF5H (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 May 2019 01:57:07 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f194.google.com ([209.85.208.194]:43390 "EHLO mail-lj1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727539AbfEGF5F (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 May 2019 01:57:05 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f194.google.com with SMTP id z5so8033172lji.10 for ; Mon, 06 May 2019 22:57:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rasmusvillemoes.dk; s=google; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=C7TwO1vjbNHfMqbAxi9vlDVvmDYxhZ6ib+epFPKTheM=; b=TDEjJvzcgnurW1FPZtCH9rYP2rDymIZeqdMqRdGI15WUsXRAn3v7+lnmyZ0fdZGIeF Pc5D+zhVmkFbz3l3w4gfKZ2EnMZd+l84USSuNcl+9kMp8kUMYmIHDBt8nJJyKVkqp9N6 bfTxje9VGE12bymK8hn65n+jfWRpU1o46JJJI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=C7TwO1vjbNHfMqbAxi9vlDVvmDYxhZ6ib+epFPKTheM=; b=Z0gsu2fcxjADZJ0+LfUkysv+/18/YYAIll+1hEjZsw6PeuBxgH3QYJD663eJbYYfA8 rtyrdTzJK53NSduHHwtS8XjfxFSpWbFA8JyAilAPeY8n21PZU8eYD0DUPEjlhdYOTBRH MaYfniGgQuSEVRibO1bnfaYMNzFIQGBjNHNTNoAIn46ydFYkluntED0buC9ScXPqWQR3 UDSUdcUbGU+/8L99UTQuDw0SyL7xiAZz//H1o60XNgxWDev78eW1FMO8kfJrXbhuO3cO sFajMsWyyt9JA4sJgKLwGvk3XC1jWiDbwkTxqxYgzO2hPrXxOK3lK2v/PbgUkF5Dkhj3 uFCw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXOQvJNAPJ/KTlWOdd9D2+IWik0aGb8+CVNI8tiGkAuys62VlYH UWzoKvXvPmKxE8GZXOeYznnNZQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwERnjT55opTEsv307+a6frciS871V94u2tJ9NDGTgJXKuYC1Zj43Kpzyifcos6RVOT/S+r2A== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:84ca:: with SMTP id q10mr2535264ljh.117.1557208623493; Mon, 06 May 2019 22:57:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.16.11.26] ([81.216.59.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s17sm1889372lfb.66.2019.05.06.22.57.02 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 06 May 2019 22:57:02 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 79/95] x86/asm: Remove dead __GNUC__ conditionals To: Sasha Levin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , Dan Williams , Geert Uytterhoeven , Ingo Molnar , Matthew Wilcox , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , x86-ml , Sasha Levin References: <20190507053826.31622-1-sashal@kernel.org> <20190507053826.31622-79-sashal@kernel.org> From: Rasmus Villemoes Message-ID: Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 07:57:01 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190507053826.31622-79-sashal@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/05/2019 07.38, Sasha Levin wrote: > From: Rasmus Villemoes > > [ Upstream commit 88ca66d8540ca26119b1428cddb96b37925bdf01 ] > > The minimum supported gcc version is >= 4.6, so these can be removed. Eh, that bump happened for the 4.19 kernel, so this is not true for the 4.14 branch. Has cafa0010cd51fb711fdcb50fc55f394c5f167a0a been applied to 4.14.y? Otherwise I don't think this is appropriate. Rasmus