From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [209.85.160.53] (helo=mail-pw0-f53.google.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N4jPR-0002Vf-QS for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:00:33 +0100 Received: by pwi18 with SMTP id 18so1609331pwi.12 for ; Sun, 01 Nov 2009 14:59:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=i8ONmzvUzc953/OIyOWDLEGZP5BvTeb/P6aYK+SHYWY=; b=Bi6Rp6RYzT6+CHP7EZQgdKB9V988RHc06YrF7qG5api0cEe2Xw4VJVbPsxUMCZoSwy RB0fOJoDq7/maVUy9hZ+oGf81vN6YgPJLoDnWn2IxJITcNQC3vH5Xjt1qAmTA0KsVuk8 JFDVwavv4c9iZICqWf5kAaExqaVHgejX9qFUI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=IrF+lFsJmpEpmwZ+s1upg6TCh0sqezuMdS+F1tQbeWPP2NCqnWKOeK0Od10zFNmBFI bYs/QbFm/bdPBWTJoJuxbq77DUc3WU8wL4Nb5v75lJGxxIqZr0043G1jl3qRKKWvbsIH GEl5wVL0KxgJI29OF1dv7/bDWiIU7InpcR00M= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.157.21 with SMTP id f21mr221340rve.48.1257116358934; Sun, 01 Nov 2009 14:59:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <200910291241.35265.marcin@juszkiewicz.com.pl> Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 23:59:18 +0100 Message-ID: From: Andrea Adami To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.160.53 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andrea.adami@gmail.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: Checksums.ini again - new format this time X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:00:33 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 And what about having a checksum file in each dir of /recipes ? If the checksum changes the PR should be changed too. While Gentoo's guys started from the opposite situation (one checksum each recipe), this could be an interesting read: http://www.gentoo.org/news/20080204-digest-files-removed.xml Specifically the bits about GLEP44. My 2 (euro)cents Andrea