From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CFB4C00140 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 09:28:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232860AbiHRJ2g (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2022 05:28:36 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34560 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233348AbiHRJ2g (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2022 05:28:36 -0400 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5E972B611; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 02:28:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fraeml739-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.201]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4M7fch5Y73z688mK; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 17:25:24 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500003.china.huawei.com (7.191.162.67) by fraeml739-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.220) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 11:28:31 +0200 Received: from [10.48.157.252] (10.48.157.252) by lhrpeml500003.china.huawei.com (7.191.162.67) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 10:28:30 +0100 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 10:28:30 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1 Subject: Re: [ata] 0568e61225: stress-ng.copy-file.ops_per_sec -15.0% regression To: Oliver Sang CC: Damien Le Moal , Christoph Hellwig , "Martin K. Petersen" , LKML , Linux Memory Management List , , , , , , , References: <2e9cf5a6-c043-5ccf-e363-097c6c941891@huawei.com> <43eaa104-5b09-072c-56aa-6289569b0015@opensource.wdc.com> <28d6e48b-f52f-9467-8260-262504a1a1ff@huawei.com> <743867a6-b266-58e4-a8a6-542757916f0a@huawei.com> From: John Garry In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.48.157.252] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml100004.china.huawei.com (7.191.162.219) To lhrpeml500003.china.huawei.com (7.191.162.67) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On 18/08/2022 03:06, Oliver Sang wrote: Hi Oliver, >>> did I do the right thing? >> Sorry but I was not really interested in 4cbfca5f77 and I see where that >> build error is coming, but don't be concerned with it. However, for >> avoidance of doubt, if you have results for vanilla v6.0-rc1 then that would >> be appreciated. > for v6.0-rc1, it's still 512/512 > >> I will also send a separate patch for testing if you don't mind. > sure! we are very glad that we could help. As you probably saw, I sent "[RFT PATCH] ata: libata: Set __ATA_BASE_SHT max_sectors" for testing on top of v6.0-rc1, and I hope that then we can get same performance as v5.19 Thanks, John From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7447717519339181597==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: John Garry To: lkp@lists.01.org Subject: Re: [ata] 0568e61225: stress-ng.copy-file.ops_per_sec -15.0% regression Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 10:28:30 +0100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: List-Id: --===============7447717519339181597== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 18/08/2022 03:06, Oliver Sang wrote: Hi Oliver, >>> did I do the right thing? >> Sorry but I was not really interested in 4cbfca5f77 and I see where that >> build error is coming, but don't be concerned with it. However, for >> avoidance of doubt, if you have results for vanilla v6.0-rc1 then that w= ould >> be appreciated. > for v6.0-rc1, it's still 512/512 > = >> I will also send a separate patch for testing if you don't mind. > sure! we are very glad that we could help. As you probably saw, I sent "[RFT PATCH] ata: libata: Set __ATA_BASE_SHT = max_sectors" for testing on top of v6.0-rc1, and I hope that then we can = get same performance as v5.19 Thanks, John --===============7447717519339181597==--