All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew DeVore <matvore@google.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Matthew DeVore <matvore@google.com>,
	jeffhost@microsoft.com, peff@peff.net, stefanbeller@gmail.com,
	jonathantanmy@google.com
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] list-objects: store common func args in struct
Date: Thu,  9 Aug 2018 15:45:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d1bdc10e2700f6d5b400ab1c06cacd50a1345f03.1533854545.git.matvore@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1533854545.git.matvore@google.com>

This will make utility functions easier to create, as done by the next
patch.

Signed-off-by: Matthew DeVore <matvore@google.com>
---
 list-objects.c | 152 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)

diff --git a/list-objects.c b/list-objects.c
index 482044bda..fa34fbf58 100644
--- a/list-objects.c
+++ b/list-objects.c
@@ -12,20 +12,25 @@
 #include "packfile.h"
 #include "object-store.h"
 
-static void process_blob(struct rev_info *revs,
+struct traversal_context {
+	struct rev_info *revs;
+	show_object_fn show_object;
+	show_commit_fn show_commit;
+	void *show_data;
+	filter_object_fn filter_fn;
+	void *filter_data;
+};
+
+static void process_blob(struct traversal_context *ctx,
 			 struct blob *blob,
-			 show_object_fn show,
 			 struct strbuf *path,
-			 const char *name,
-			 void *cb_data,
-			 filter_object_fn filter_fn,
-			 void *filter_data)
+			 const char *name)
 {
 	struct object *obj = &blob->object;
 	size_t pathlen;
 	enum list_objects_filter_result r = LOFR_MARK_SEEN | LOFR_DO_SHOW;
 
-	if (!revs->blob_objects)
+	if (!ctx->revs->blob_objects)
 		return;
 	if (!obj)
 		die("bad blob object");
@@ -41,21 +46,21 @@ static void process_blob(struct rev_info *revs,
 	 * may cause the actual filter to report an incomplete list
 	 * of missing objects.
 	 */
-	if (revs->exclude_promisor_objects &&
+	if (ctx->revs->exclude_promisor_objects &&
 	    !has_object_file(&obj->oid) &&
 	    is_promisor_object(&obj->oid))
 		return;
 
 	pathlen = path->len;
 	strbuf_addstr(path, name);
-	if ((obj->flags & NOT_USER_GIVEN) && filter_fn)
-		r = filter_fn(LOFS_BLOB, obj,
-			      path->buf, &path->buf[pathlen],
-			      filter_data);
+	if ((obj->flags & NOT_USER_GIVEN) && ctx->filter_fn)
+		r = ctx->filter_fn(LOFS_BLOB, obj,
+				   path->buf, &path->buf[pathlen],
+				   ctx->filter_data);
 	if (r & LOFR_MARK_SEEN)
 		obj->flags |= SEEN;
 	if (r & LOFR_DO_SHOW)
-		show(obj, path->buf, cb_data);
+		ctx->show_object(obj, path->buf, ctx->show_data);
 	strbuf_setlen(path, pathlen);
 }
 
@@ -81,26 +86,21 @@ static void process_blob(struct rev_info *revs,
  * the link, and how to do it. Whether it necessarily makes
  * any sense what-so-ever to ever do that is another issue.
  */
-static void process_gitlink(struct rev_info *revs,
+static void process_gitlink(struct traversal_context *ctx,
 			    const unsigned char *sha1,
-			    show_object_fn show,
 			    struct strbuf *path,
-			    const char *name,
-			    void *cb_data)
+			    const char *name)
 {
 	/* Nothing to do */
 }
 
-static void process_tree(struct rev_info *revs,
+static void process_tree(struct traversal_context *ctx,
 			 struct tree *tree,
-			 show_object_fn show,
 			 struct strbuf *base,
-			 const char *name,
-			 void *cb_data,
-			 filter_object_fn filter_fn,
-			 void *filter_data)
+			 const char *name)
 {
 	struct object *obj = &tree->object;
+	struct rev_info *revs = ctx->revs;
 	struct tree_desc desc;
 	struct name_entry entry;
 	enum interesting match = revs->diffopt.pathspec.nr == 0 ?
@@ -133,14 +133,14 @@ static void process_tree(struct rev_info *revs,
 	}
 
 	strbuf_addstr(base, name);
-	if ((obj->flags & NOT_USER_GIVEN) && filter_fn)
-		r = filter_fn(LOFS_BEGIN_TREE, obj,
-			      base->buf, &base->buf[baselen],
-			      filter_data);
+	if ((obj->flags & NOT_USER_GIVEN) && ctx->filter_fn)
+		r = ctx->filter_fn(LOFS_BEGIN_TREE, obj,
+				   base->buf, &base->buf[baselen],
+				   ctx->filter_data);
 	if (r & LOFR_MARK_SEEN)
 		obj->flags |= SEEN;
 	if (r & LOFR_DO_SHOW)
-		show(obj, base->buf, cb_data);
+		ctx->show_object(obj, base->buf, ctx->show_data);
 	if (base->len)
 		strbuf_addch(base, '/');
 
@@ -159,29 +159,26 @@ static void process_tree(struct rev_info *revs,
 		if (S_ISDIR(entry.mode)) {
 			struct tree *t = lookup_tree(the_repository, entry.oid);
 			t->object.flags |= NOT_USER_GIVEN;
-			process_tree(revs, t, show, base, entry.path,
-				     cb_data, filter_fn, filter_data);
+			process_tree(ctx, t, base, entry.path);
 		}
 		else if (S_ISGITLINK(entry.mode))
-			process_gitlink(revs, entry.oid->hash,
-					show, base, entry.path,
-					cb_data);
+			process_gitlink(ctx, entry.oid->hash,
+					base, entry.path);
 		else {
 			struct blob *b = lookup_blob(the_repository, entry.oid);
 			b->object.flags |= NOT_USER_GIVEN;
-			process_blob(revs, b, show, base, entry.path,
-				     cb_data, filter_fn, filter_data);
+			process_blob(ctx, b, base, entry.path);
 		}
 	}
 
-	if ((obj->flags & NOT_USER_GIVEN) && filter_fn) {
-		r = filter_fn(LOFS_END_TREE, obj,
-			      base->buf, &base->buf[baselen],
-			      filter_data);
+	if ((obj->flags & NOT_USER_GIVEN) && ctx->filter_fn) {
+		r = ctx->filter_fn(LOFS_END_TREE, obj,
+				   base->buf, &base->buf[baselen],
+				   ctx->filter_data);
 		if (r & LOFR_MARK_SEEN)
 			obj->flags |= SEEN;
 		if (r & LOFR_DO_SHOW)
-			show(obj, base->buf, cb_data);
+			ctx->show_object(obj, base->buf, ctx->show_data);
 	}
 
 	strbuf_setlen(base, baselen);
@@ -244,19 +241,15 @@ static void add_pending_tree(struct rev_info *revs, struct tree *tree)
 	add_pending_object(revs, &tree->object, "");
 }
 
-static void traverse_trees_and_blobs(struct rev_info *revs,
-				     struct strbuf *base,
-				     show_object_fn show_object,
-				     void *show_data,
-				     filter_object_fn filter_fn,
-				     void *filter_data)
+static void traverse_trees_and_blobs(struct traversal_context *ctx,
+				     struct strbuf *base)
 {
 	int i;
 
 	assert(base->len == 0);
 
-	for (i = 0; i < revs->pending.nr; i++) {
-		struct object_array_entry *pending = revs->pending.objects + i;
+	for (i = 0; i < ctx->revs->pending.nr; i++) {
+		struct object_array_entry *pending = ctx->revs->pending.objects + i;
 		struct object *obj = pending->item;
 		const char *name = pending->name;
 		const char *path = pending->path;
@@ -264,41 +257,32 @@ static void traverse_trees_and_blobs(struct rev_info *revs,
 			continue;
 		if (obj->type == OBJ_TAG) {
 			obj->flags |= SEEN;
-			show_object(obj, name, show_data);
+			ctx->show_object(obj, name, ctx->show_data);
 			continue;
 		}
 		if (!path)
 			path = "";
 		if (obj->type == OBJ_TREE) {
-			process_tree(revs, (struct tree *)obj, show_object,
-				     base, path, show_data,
-				     filter_fn, filter_data);
+			process_tree(ctx, (struct tree *)obj, base, path);
 			continue;
 		}
 		if (obj->type == OBJ_BLOB) {
-			process_blob(revs, (struct blob *)obj, show_object,
-				     base, path, show_data,
-				     filter_fn, filter_data);
+			process_blob(ctx, (struct blob *)obj, base, path);
 			continue;
 		}
 		die("unknown pending object %s (%s)",
 		    oid_to_hex(&obj->oid), name);
 	}
-	object_array_clear(&revs->pending);
+	object_array_clear(&ctx->revs->pending);
 }
 
-static void do_traverse(struct rev_info *revs,
-			show_commit_fn show_commit,
-			show_object_fn show_object,
-			void *show_data,
-			filter_object_fn filter_fn,
-			void *filter_data)
+static void do_traverse(struct traversal_context *ctx)
 {
 	struct commit *commit;
 	struct strbuf csp; /* callee's scratch pad */
 	strbuf_init(&csp, PATH_MAX);
 
-	while ((commit = get_revision(revs)) != NULL) {
+	while ((commit = get_revision(ctx->revs)) != NULL) {
 		/*
 		 * an uninteresting boundary commit may not have its tree
 		 * parsed yet, but we are not going to show them anyway
@@ -306,23 +290,19 @@ static void do_traverse(struct rev_info *revs,
 		if (get_commit_tree(commit)) {
 			struct tree *tree = get_commit_tree(commit);
 			tree->object.flags |= NOT_USER_GIVEN;
-			add_pending_tree(revs, tree);
+			add_pending_tree(ctx->revs, tree);
 		}
-		show_commit(commit, show_data);
+		ctx->show_commit(commit, ctx->show_data);
 
-		if (revs->tree_blobs_in_commit_order)
+		if (ctx->revs->tree_blobs_in_commit_order)
 			/*
 			 * NEEDSWORK: Adding the tree and then flushing it here
 			 * needs a reallocation for each commit. Can we pass the
 			 * tree directory without allocation churn?
 			 */
-			traverse_trees_and_blobs(revs, &csp,
-						 show_object, show_data,
-						 filter_fn, filter_data);
+			traverse_trees_and_blobs(ctx, &csp);
 	}
-	traverse_trees_and_blobs(revs, &csp,
-				 show_object, show_data,
-				 filter_fn, filter_data);
+	traverse_trees_and_blobs(ctx, &csp);
 	strbuf_release(&csp);
 }
 
@@ -331,7 +311,14 @@ void traverse_commit_list(struct rev_info *revs,
 			  show_object_fn show_object,
 			  void *show_data)
 {
-	do_traverse(revs, show_commit, show_object, show_data, NULL, NULL);
+	struct traversal_context ctx;
+	ctx.revs = revs;
+	ctx.show_commit = show_commit;
+	ctx.show_object = show_object;
+	ctx.show_data = show_data;
+	ctx.filter_fn = NULL;
+	ctx.filter_data = NULL;
+	do_traverse(&ctx);
 }
 
 void traverse_commit_list_filtered(
@@ -342,14 +329,17 @@ void traverse_commit_list_filtered(
 	void *show_data,
 	struct oidset *omitted)
 {
-	filter_object_fn filter_fn = NULL;
+	struct traversal_context ctx;
+	ctx.revs = revs;
+	ctx.show_object = show_object;
+	ctx.show_commit = show_commit;
+	ctx.show_data = show_data;
+	ctx.filter_fn = NULL;
 	filter_free_fn filter_free_fn = NULL;
-	void *filter_data = NULL;
 
-	filter_data = list_objects_filter__init(omitted, filter_options,
-						&filter_fn, &filter_free_fn);
-	do_traverse(revs, show_commit, show_object, show_data,
-		    filter_fn, filter_data);
-	if (filter_data && filter_free_fn)
-		filter_free_fn(filter_data);
+	ctx.filter_data = list_objects_filter__init(omitted, filter_options,
+						    &ctx.filter_fn, &filter_free_fn);
+	do_traverse(&ctx);
+	if (ctx.filter_data && filter_free_fn)
+		filter_free_fn(ctx.filter_data);
 }
-- 
2.18.0.597.ga71716f1ad-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-08-09 22:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 151+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-09 22:44 [RFC PATCH 0/5] filter: support for excluding all trees and blobs Matthew DeVore
2018-08-09 22:45 ` [PATCH 1/5] revision: invert meaning of the USER_GIVEN flag Matthew DeVore
2018-08-10 18:43   ` Jonathan Tan
2018-08-09 22:45 ` [PATCH 2/5] list-objects-filter: implement filter only:commits Matthew DeVore
2018-08-10  0:14   ` Jonathan Tan
2018-08-09 22:45 ` Matthew DeVore [this message]
2018-08-09 22:45 ` [PATCH 4/5] list-objects: refactor to process_tree_contents Matthew DeVore
2018-08-09 22:45 ` [PATCH 5/5] rev-list: handle missing tree objects properly Matthew DeVore
2018-08-10  0:24   ` Jonathan Tan
2018-08-10 19:03 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] filter: support for excluding all trees and blobs Jonathan Tan
2018-08-10 23:06 ` [PATCH v2 " Matthew DeVore
2018-08-10 23:06   ` [PATCH v2 1/5] list-objects: store common func args in struct Matthew DeVore
2018-08-10 23:06   ` [PATCH v2 2/5] list-objects: refactor to process_tree_contents Matthew DeVore
2018-08-10 23:06   ` [PATCH v2 3/5] rev-list: handle missing tree objects properly Matthew DeVore
2018-08-13 18:20     ` Jonathan Tan
2018-08-14  0:22       ` Matthew DeVore
2018-08-14 16:03         ` Jonathan Tan
2018-08-10 23:06   ` [PATCH v2 4/5] revision: mark non-user-given objects instead Matthew DeVore
2018-08-10 23:06   ` [PATCH v2 5/5] list-objects-filter: implement filter tree:none Matthew DeVore
2018-08-13 16:38     ` Jeff Hostetler
2018-08-14  0:57       ` Matthew DeVore
2018-08-13 18:29     ` Jonathan Tan
2018-08-14  0:55       ` Matthew DeVore
2018-08-13 18:14 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] filter: support for excluding all trees and blobs Matthew DeVore
2018-08-13 18:14   ` [PATCH v3 1/5] list-objects: store common func args in struct Matthew DeVore
2018-08-13 18:14   ` [PATCH v3 2/5] list-objects: refactor to process_tree_contents Matthew DeVore
2018-08-13 18:14   ` [PATCH v3 3/5] rev-list: handle missing tree objects properly Matthew DeVore
2018-08-13 18:14   ` [PATCH v3 4/5] revision: mark non-user-given objects instead Matthew DeVore
2018-08-13 18:14   ` [PATCH v3 5/5] list-objects-filter: implement filter tree:0 Matthew DeVore
2018-08-14 15:13     ` Jeff Hostetler
2018-08-14 17:25       ` Matthew DeVore
2018-10-03 19:00       ` Matthew DeVore
2018-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] filter: support for excluding all trees and blobs Matthew DeVore
2018-08-14 17:28   ` [PATCH v4 1/6] list-objects: store common func args in struct Matthew DeVore
2018-08-14 17:28   ` [PATCH v4 2/6] list-objects: refactor to process_tree_contents Matthew DeVore
2018-08-14 17:28   ` [PATCH v4 3/6] list-objects: always parse trees gently Matthew DeVore
2018-08-14 17:28   ` [PATCH v4 4/6] rev-list: handle missing tree objects properly Matthew DeVore
2018-08-14 18:06     ` Jonathan Tan
2018-08-14 22:43       ` Matthew DeVore
2018-08-14 22:56         ` Jonathan Tan
2018-08-14 23:14           ` Jonathan Tan
2018-08-14 17:28   ` [PATCH v4 5/6] revision: mark non-user-given objects instead Matthew DeVore
2018-08-14 17:28   ` [PATCH v4 6/6] list-objects-filter: implement filter tree:0 Matthew DeVore
2018-08-14 18:18     ` Jonathan Tan
2018-08-14 20:00       ` Matthew DeVore
2018-08-14 20:19         ` Jonathan Tan
2018-08-14 20:55           ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-14 23:30             ` Matthew DeVore
2018-08-15 16:14               ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-15 16:37                 ` Matthew DeVore
2018-08-14 20:01     ` Jeff King
2018-08-14 23:55       ` Matthew DeVore
2018-08-15  1:22         ` Jeff King
2018-08-15 16:17           ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-15 17:54             ` Matthew DeVore
2018-08-15  0:22 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] filter: support for excluding all trees and blobs Matthew DeVore
2018-08-15  0:22   ` [PATCH v5 1/6] list-objects: store common func args in struct Matthew DeVore
2018-08-15  0:22   ` [PATCH v5 2/6] list-objects: refactor to process_tree_contents Matthew DeVore
2018-08-15  0:22   ` [PATCH v5 3/6] list-objects: always parse trees gently Matthew DeVore
2018-08-15  0:22   ` [PATCH v5 4/6] rev-list: handle missing tree objects properly Matthew DeVore
2018-08-15  0:22   ` [PATCH v5 5/6] revision: mark non-user-given objects instead Matthew DeVore
2018-08-15  0:22   ` [PATCH v5 6/6] list-objects-filter: implement filter tree:0 Matthew DeVore
2018-08-15 23:19 ` [PATCH v6 0/6] filter: support for excluding all trees and blobs Matthew DeVore
2018-08-15 23:19   ` [PATCH v6 1/6] list-objects: store common func args in struct Matthew DeVore
2018-08-15 23:19   ` [PATCH v6 2/6] list-objects: refactor to process_tree_contents Matthew DeVore
2018-08-15 23:19   ` [PATCH v6 3/6] list-objects: always parse trees gently Matthew DeVore
2018-08-15 23:19   ` [PATCH v6 4/6] rev-list: handle missing tree objects properly Matthew DeVore
2018-08-15 23:19   ` [PATCH v6 5/6] revision: mark non-user-given objects instead Matthew DeVore
2018-08-15 23:19   ` [PATCH v6 6/6] list-objects-filter: implement filter tree:0 Matthew DeVore
2018-08-17 21:42     ` Stefan Beller
2018-08-17 22:19       ` Matthew DeVore
2018-08-17 22:28         ` Stefan Beller
2018-08-20 23:30           ` Matthew DeVore
2018-08-21  0:29             ` Stefan Beller
2018-08-21 21:46               ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-22 18:00                 ` Stefan Beller
2018-08-18 16:17     ` Duy Nguyen
2018-08-20 13:04       ` Matthew DeVore
2018-08-20 18:38         ` Stefan Beller
2018-08-20 23:20           ` Matthew DeVore
2018-08-21  0:36             ` Stefan Beller
2018-08-21 15:50           ` Duy Nguyen
2018-09-04 18:05 ` [PATCH v7 0/7] filter: support for excluding all trees and blobs Matthew DeVore
2018-09-04 18:05   ` [PATCH v7 1/7] list-objects: store common func args in struct Matthew DeVore
2018-09-04 18:05   ` [PATCH v7 2/7] list-objects: refactor to process_tree_contents Matthew DeVore
2018-09-04 18:05   ` [PATCH v7 3/7] list-objects: always parse trees gently Matthew DeVore
2018-09-04 18:05   ` [PATCH v7 4/7] rev-list: handle missing tree objects properly Matthew DeVore
2018-09-04 18:05   ` [PATCH v7 5/7] revision: mark non-user-given objects instead Matthew DeVore
2018-09-04 20:31     ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-05 18:00       ` Matthew DeVore
2018-09-04 18:05   ` [PATCH v7 6/7] list-objects-filter: use BUG rather than die Matthew DeVore
2018-09-04 20:32     ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-04 18:05   ` [PATCH v7 7/7] list-objects-filter: implement filter tree:0 Matthew DeVore
2018-09-04 20:44     ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-06  0:08       ` Matthew DeVore
2018-09-04 18:41   ` [PATCH v7 0/7] filter: support for excluding all trees and blobs Stefan Beller
2018-09-14  0:55 ` [PATCH v8 " Matthew DeVore
2018-09-14  0:55   ` [PATCH v8 1/7] list-objects: store common func args in struct Matthew DeVore
2018-09-14  0:55   ` [PATCH v8 2/7] list-objects: refactor to process_tree_contents Matthew DeVore
2018-09-14  0:55   ` [PATCH v8 3/7] list-objects: always parse trees gently Matthew DeVore
2018-09-14  0:55   ` [PATCH v8 4/7] rev-list: handle missing tree objects properly Matthew DeVore
2018-09-14  0:55   ` [PATCH v8 5/7] revision: mark non-user-given objects instead Matthew DeVore
2018-09-14 17:23     ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-14 20:08       ` Matthew DeVore
2018-09-14  0:55   ` [PATCH v8 6/7] list-objects-filter: use BUG rather than die Matthew DeVore
2018-09-14  0:55   ` [PATCH v8 7/7] list-objects-filter: implement filter tree:0 Matthew DeVore
2018-09-14 17:39     ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-14 17:47       ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-15  0:41         ` Matthew DeVore
2018-09-21 20:31 ` [PATCH v9 0/8] filter: support for excluding all trees and blobs Matthew DeVore
2018-09-21 20:31   ` [PATCH v9 1/8] list-objects: store common func args in struct Matthew DeVore
2018-09-21 20:31   ` [PATCH v9 2/8] list-objects: refactor to process_tree_contents Matthew DeVore
2018-09-21 20:31   ` [PATCH v9 3/8] list-objects: always parse trees gently Matthew DeVore
2018-09-21 20:32   ` [PATCH v9 4/8] rev-list: handle missing tree objects properly Matthew DeVore
2018-09-21 20:32   ` [PATCH v9 5/8] revision: mark non-user-given objects instead Matthew DeVore
2018-09-21 20:32   ` [PATCH v9 6/8] list-objects-filter: use BUG rather than die Matthew DeVore
2018-09-21 20:32   ` [PATCH v9 7/8] list-objects-filter-options: do not over-strbuf_init Matthew DeVore
2018-09-21 20:32   ` [PATCH v9 8/8] list-objects-filter: implement filter tree:0 Matthew DeVore
2018-10-03 19:52 ` [PATCH v10 0/8] filter: support for excluding all trees and blobs Matthew DeVore
2018-10-03 19:52   ` [PATCH v10 1/8] list-objects: store common func args in struct Matthew DeVore
2018-10-03 19:52   ` [PATCH v10 2/8] list-objects: refactor to process_tree_contents Matthew DeVore
2018-10-03 19:52   ` [PATCH v10 3/8] list-objects: always parse trees gently Matthew DeVore
2018-10-03 19:52   ` [PATCH v10 4/8] rev-list: handle missing tree objects properly Matthew DeVore
2018-10-03 19:52   ` [PATCH v10 5/8] revision: mark non-user-given objects instead Matthew DeVore
2018-10-03 19:52   ` [PATCH v10 6/8] list-objects-filter: use BUG rather than die Matthew DeVore
2018-10-03 19:52   ` [PATCH v10 7/8] list-objects-filter-options: do not over-strbuf_init Matthew DeVore
2018-10-03 19:52   ` [PATCH v10 8/8] list-objects-filter: implement filter tree:0 Matthew DeVore
2018-10-03 23:08   ` [PATCH v10 0/8] filter: support for excluding all trees and blobs Matthew DeVore
2018-10-05 21:31 ` [PATCH v11 " Matthew DeVore
2018-10-05 21:31   ` [PATCH v11 1/8] list-objects: store common func args in struct Matthew DeVore
2018-10-05 21:31   ` [PATCH v11 2/8] list-objects: refactor to process_tree_contents Matthew DeVore
2018-10-05 21:31   ` [PATCH v11 3/8] list-objects: always parse trees gently Matthew DeVore
2018-10-05 21:31   ` [PATCH v11 4/8] rev-list: handle missing tree objects properly Matthew DeVore
2018-10-05 21:31   ` [PATCH v11 5/8] revision: mark non-user-given objects instead Matthew DeVore
2018-10-05 21:31   ` [PATCH v11 6/8] list-objects-filter: use BUG rather than die Matthew DeVore
2018-10-05 21:31   ` [PATCH v11 7/8] list-objects-filter-options: do not over-strbuf_init Matthew DeVore
2018-10-05 21:31   ` [PATCH v11 8/8] list-objects-filter: implement filter tree:0 Matthew DeVore
2018-10-07  0:10     ` Junio C Hamano
2018-10-08 17:23       ` Matthew DeVore
2018-10-12 20:01 ` [PATCH v12 0/8] filter: support for excluding all trees and blobs Matthew DeVore
2018-10-12 20:01   ` [PATCH v12 1/8] list-objects: store common func args in struct Matthew DeVore
2018-10-12 20:01   ` [PATCH v12 2/8] list-objects: refactor to process_tree_contents Matthew DeVore
2018-10-12 20:01   ` [PATCH v12 3/8] list-objects: always parse trees gently Matthew DeVore
2018-10-12 20:01   ` [PATCH v12 4/8] rev-list: handle missing tree objects properly Matthew DeVore
2018-10-12 20:01   ` [PATCH v12 5/8] revision: mark non-user-given objects instead Matthew DeVore
2018-10-12 20:01   ` [PATCH v12 6/8] list-objects-filter: use BUG rather than die Matthew DeVore
2018-10-12 20:01   ` [PATCH v12 7/8] list-objects-filter-options: do not over-strbuf_init Matthew DeVore
2018-10-12 20:01   ` [PATCH v12 8/8] list-objects-filter: implement filter tree:0 Matthew DeVore
2018-10-15  2:37   ` [PATCH v12 0/8] filter: support for excluding all trees and blobs Junio C Hamano
2018-10-15  3:42     ` Junio C Hamano
2018-10-16 15:00       ` Matthew DeVore

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d1bdc10e2700f6d5b400ab1c06cacd50a1345f03.1533854545.git.matvore@google.com \
    --to=matvore@google.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jeffhost@microsoft.com \
    --cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=stefanbeller@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.