From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-20.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E50C433E6 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 13:46:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA722651C2 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 13:46:49 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EA722651C2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=amsat.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:57720 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJGDg-0002vm-Rp for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 08:46:48 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48952) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJG1V-0007ce-8X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 08:34:13 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x631.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::631]:35214) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJG1S-0001kb-QI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 08:34:12 -0500 Received: by mail-ej1-x631.google.com with SMTP id dx17so20435713ejb.2 for ; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 05:34:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2GMxVklie4vmHIPQCvWWOhONMn+AEDnZu+IiqlNnhII=; b=BBac93dtKc+MpEGziPZ6iAWPvTwC1KgqTKurIMQwY1py4GD3h4bZWQRvoUYPX6mwSz aeuQaIefyMFsZpuacqRQ4idQwgRj+AXlTSIr5+doY0gvmx4Rb+5Mnwifwy+LnuFykBF5 GQk2X5jV51ZeNRV0guplM2zPxxkBNLIJSDIZljsnNRUvj0bFI0Fbd7cTY8by1pqhFojn dZ7CvmGBJsTMT1i4S46VfUwDR9N5ooKPuL+zIKiNvQFmMNCeVc7TBTw/yk0faDKS6lng 8n2V2foMq010yee/Wv85hlFRL6zW4oZ/IqProdGOP/wlgmw1VWn/9dz+uc2jy7Mhb7I4 T4hQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2GMxVklie4vmHIPQCvWWOhONMn+AEDnZu+IiqlNnhII=; b=G67AuyUh56NO4Ja80P3pHehk8tNNYWtSfAImm0cySusjwoIDTNVjyRAyxV7RvZxpjI ybDNrzZgxJ8Sgd/ZO74ZzffKc7jzUHPS13UNE6FSz9w1XPfeC5BJLojNrH3FPWHQPmKD L7R9dO56rG9gFbkrcLRYTMauWEhw44cyi+qVNgtBG4zLb9wubByF8zfB3JdE9+tGNkeM EcdaRX8xW7l6q6xekN3pgtk/9xJNC0Y4YRjGawqFPR5hM61DPlMe9KtasEk22C7+xJKT u8c/azpRYxAgA1oaaKHcjEW84YpxpDJPVmancrPdWOUwAWfDP7TGURPprbGi49K726u2 OUNg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533YXevX7leH89wO9ZD+8DEp61ZV/ZIf4P81GmukkeHKoZtyzLzZ 8YyjFnl4q3ZjlNcJ7foIYQI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz6+PR/tJsslXlRlFbWU4fHQDm2QNpqDNhgB78N2286v51vrYhDMO9NyMaTevZF2/gdFONaQg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ae96:: with SMTP id md22mr14523237ejb.409.1615210448595; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 05:34:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.36] (68.red-83-57-175.dynamicip.rima-tde.net. [83.57.175.68]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y12sm6778319ejb.104.2021.03.08.05.34.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Mar 2021 05:34:08 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Merge the Gitlab-CI section into the generic CI section To: =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= , Thomas Huth References: <20210307113403.11028-1-thuth@redhat.com> <878s6xam83.fsf@linaro.org> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= Message-ID: Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 14:34:06 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <878s6xam83.fsf@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::631; envelope-from=philippe.mathieu.daude@gmail.com; helo=mail-ej1-x631.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -14 X-Spam_score: -1.5 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Willian Rampazzo , Wainer dos Santos Moschetta Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Hi Alex, On 3/8/21 12:57 PM, Alex Bennée wrote: > > Thomas Huth writes: > >> The status of the gitlab-CI files is currently somewhat confusing, and >> it is often not quite clear whether a patch should go via my tree or >> via the testing tree of Alex. That situation has grown historically... >> Initially, I was the only one using the gitlab-CI, just for my private >> repository there. But in the course of time, the gitlab-CI switched to >> use the containers from tests/docker/ (which is not part of the gitlab-CI >> section in the MAINTAINERS file), and QEMU now even switched to gitlab.com >> completely for the repository and will soon use it as its gating CI, too. >> So it makes way more sense if the gitlab-ci.yml files belong to the people >> who are owning the qemu-project on gitlab.com and take care of the gitlab >> CI there. Thus let's merge the gitlab-ci section into the common "test and >> build automation" section, > > I have no problem with this, might as well keep it all together. > >> and change the status of myself to a "reviewer" >> there instead. > > Can we not have multiple maintainers? Considering how important keeping > the testing green should be wouldn't it help to keep the bus factor > lower (not to mention holidays/breaks and just plain busy with other > things periods). It shouldn't be to hard to track as long as we mention > when we queue things to our trees? I'm OK to be listed as backup maintainer as I do have a genuine interest in CI/testing. It will be in my scarcer personal time although, so better if another maintainers with more resources could pop up along instead. >> While we're at it, I'm also removing the line with Fam there for now, >> since he was hardly active during the last years in this area anymore. >> If he ever gets more time for this part again in the future, we surely >> can add the line back again. >> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth >> --- >> MAINTAINERS | 19 ++++++------------- >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)