All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com,
	david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/3] s390x: mvpg: Add SIE mvpg test
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2021 09:24:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d4966f2c-89b4-94b7-0dc7-df69534c2d7a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210629131841.17319-4-frankja@linux.ibm.com>

On 29/06/2021 15.18, Janosch Frank wrote:
> Let's also check the PEI values to make sure our VSIE implementation
> is correct.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   s390x/Makefile                  |   2 +
>   s390x/mvpg-sie.c                | 151 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   s390x/snippets/c/mvpg-snippet.c |  33 +++++++
>   s390x/unittests.cfg             |   3 +
>   4 files changed, 189 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 s390x/mvpg-sie.c
>   create mode 100644 s390x/snippets/c/mvpg-snippet.c
> 
> diff --git a/s390x/Makefile b/s390x/Makefile
> index ba32f4c..07af26d 100644
> --- a/s390x/Makefile
> +++ b/s390x/Makefile
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ tests += $(TEST_DIR)/sie.elf
>   tests += $(TEST_DIR)/mvpg.elf
>   tests += $(TEST_DIR)/uv-host.elf
>   tests += $(TEST_DIR)/edat.elf
> +tests += $(TEST_DIR)/mvpg-sie.elf
>   
>   tests_binary = $(patsubst %.elf,%.bin,$(tests))
>   ifneq ($(HOST_KEY_DOCUMENT),)
> @@ -82,6 +83,7 @@ snippet_asmlib = $(SNIPPET_DIR)/c/cstart.o
>   
>   # perquisites (=guests) for the snippet hosts.
>   # $(TEST_DIR)/<snippet-host>.elf: snippets = $(SNIPPET_DIR)/<c/asm>/<snippet>.gbin
> +$(TEST_DIR)/mvpg-sie.elf: snippets = $(SNIPPET_DIR)/c/mvpg-snippet.gbin
>   
>   $(SNIPPET_DIR)/asm/%.gbin: $(SNIPPET_DIR)/asm/%.o $(FLATLIBS)
>   	$(OBJCOPY) -O binary $(patsubst %.gbin,%.o,$@) $@
> diff --git a/s390x/mvpg-sie.c b/s390x/mvpg-sie.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..3536c6a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/s390x/mvpg-sie.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
> +#include <libcflat.h>
> +#include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
> +#include <asm-generic/barrier.h>
> +#include <asm/pgtable.h>
> +#include <mmu.h>
> +#include <asm/page.h>
> +#include <asm/facility.h>
> +#include <asm/mem.h>
> +#include <alloc_page.h>
> +#include <vm.h>
> +#include <sclp.h>
> +#include <sie.h>
> +
> +static u8 *guest;
> +static u8 *guest_instr;
> +static struct vm vm;
> +
> +static uint8_t *src;
> +static uint8_t *dst;
> +static uint8_t *cmp;
> +
> +extern const char _binary_s390x_snippets_c_mvpg_snippet_gbin_start[];
> +extern const char _binary_s390x_snippets_c_mvpg_snippet_gbin_end[];
> +int binary_size;
> +
> +static void sie(struct vm *vm)
> +{
> +	/* Reset icptcode so we don't trip over it below */
> +	vm->sblk->icptcode = 0;
> +
> +	while (vm->sblk->icptcode == 0) {
> +		sie64a(vm->sblk, &vm->save_area);
> +		if (vm->sblk->icptcode == ICPT_VALIDITY)
> +			assert(0);

Please replace the above two lines with:

		assert(vm->sblk->icptcode != ICPT_VALIDITY);

> +	}
> +	vm->save_area.guest.grs[14] = vm->sblk->gg14;
> +	vm->save_area.guest.grs[15] = vm->sblk->gg15;
> +}
> +
> +static void test_mvpg_pei(void)
> +{
> +	uint64_t **pei_dst = (uint64_t **)((uintptr_t) vm.sblk + 0xc0);
> +	uint64_t **pei_src = (uint64_t **)((uintptr_t) vm.sblk + 0xc8);
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("pei");
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("src");
> +	memset(dst, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
> +	protect_page(src, PAGE_ENTRY_I);
> +	sie(&vm);
> +	report(vm.sblk->icptcode == ICPT_PARTEXEC, "Partial execution");
> +	report((uintptr_t)**pei_src == (uintptr_t)src + PAGE_ENTRY_I, "PEI_SRC correct");
> +	report((uintptr_t)**pei_dst == (uintptr_t)dst, "PEI_DST correct");
> +	unprotect_page(src, PAGE_ENTRY_I);
> +	report(!memcmp(cmp, dst, PAGE_SIZE), "Destination intact");
> +	/*
> +	 * We need to execute the diag44 which is used as a blocker
> +	 * behind the mvpg. It makes sure we fail the tests above if
> +	 * the mvpg wouldn't have intercepted.
> +	 */
> +	sie(&vm);
> +	/* Make sure we intercepted for the diag44 and nothing else */
> +	assert(vm.sblk->icptcode == ICPT_INST &&
> +	       vm.sblk->ipa == 0x8300 && vm.sblk->ipb == 0x440000);
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +
> +	/* Clear PEI data for next check */
> +	report_prefix_push("dst");
> +	memset((uint64_t *)((uintptr_t) vm.sblk + 0xc0), 0, 16);
> +	memset(dst, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
> +	protect_page(dst, PAGE_ENTRY_I);
> +	sie(&vm);
> +	report(vm.sblk->icptcode == ICPT_PARTEXEC, "Partial execution");
> +	report((uintptr_t)**pei_src == (uintptr_t)src, "PEI_SRC correct");
> +	report((uintptr_t)**pei_dst == (uintptr_t)dst + PAGE_ENTRY_I, "PEI_DST correct");
> +	/* Needed for the memcmp and general cleanup */
> +	unprotect_page(dst, PAGE_ENTRY_I);
> +	report(!memcmp(cmp, dst, PAGE_SIZE), "Destination intact");
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +}

Still quite a lot of magic values in above code ... any chance to introduce 
some #defines finally?

> +static void test_mvpg(void)
> +{
> +	int binary_size = ((uintptr_t)_binary_s390x_snippets_c_mvpg_snippet_gbin_end -
> +			   (uintptr_t)_binary_s390x_snippets_c_mvpg_snippet_gbin_start);
> +
> +	memcpy(guest, _binary_s390x_snippets_c_mvpg_snippet_gbin_start, binary_size);
> +	memset(src, 0x42, PAGE_SIZE);
> +	memset(dst, 0x43, PAGE_SIZE);
> +	sie(&vm);
> +	mb();

I think you don't need the mb() here.

> +	report(!memcmp(src, dst, PAGE_SIZE) && *dst == 0x42, "Page moved");
> +}

  Thomas


  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-05  7:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-29 13:18 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/3] s390x: Add snippet support Janosch Frank
2021-06-29 13:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/3] s390x: snippets: Add gitignore as well as linker script and start assembly Janosch Frank
2021-07-04 16:42   ` Thomas Huth
2021-06-29 13:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/3] s390x: snippets: Add snippet compilation Janosch Frank
2021-06-29 13:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/3] s390x: mvpg: Add SIE mvpg test Janosch Frank
2021-07-05  7:24   ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2021-07-05  9:37     ` Janosch Frank
2021-07-05  9:52       ` Thomas Huth
2021-07-05  9:56         ` Janosch Frank

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d4966f2c-89b4-94b7-0dc7-df69534c2d7a@redhat.com \
    --to=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.