From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B646C04EB5 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 15:37:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294EA22464 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 15:37:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727118AbgBGPhR convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Feb 2020 10:37:17 -0500 Received: from szxga08-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.255]:45068 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726897AbgBGPhQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Feb 2020 10:37:16 -0500 Received: from DGGEMM401-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.54]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id E2BAF42169CDF2579051; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 23:37:10 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggeme715-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.111) by DGGEMM401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.209) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 23:37:10 +0800 Received: from dggeme763-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.109) by dggeme715-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 23:37:10 +0800 Received: from dggeme763-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.66.36]) by dggeme763-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.66.36]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 23:37:10 +0800 From: linmiaohe To: Eric Auger CC: "thuth@redhat.com" , "drjones@redhat.com" , "wei.huang2@amd.com" , "krish.sadhukhan@oracle.com" , "eric.auger.pro@gmail.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "pbonzini@redhat.com" , "vkuznets@redhat.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] selftests: KVM: Remove unused x86_register enum Thread-Topic: [PATCH v5 2/4] selftests: KVM: Remove unused x86_register enum Thread-Index: AdXdzCUaPbXzvCH9Sx6jLGTWLt8gGw== Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 15:37:10 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.173.221.158] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Eric Auger writes: >x86_register enum is not used. Its presence incites us to enumerate GPRs in the same order in other looming structs. So let's remove it. > >Signed-off-by: Eric Auger >Suggested-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov Make sense for me. Thanks. Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin