[PATCH] mempool: introduce flag to indicate hw mempool

[PATCH] mempool: introduce flag to indicate hw mempool

[Hemant Agrawal]

Hardware pools need to distinguish between buffers allocated using
software or hardware backed pools.

Some HW NICs may choose to autonomously free the pickets during
transmit if the packet is from HW pool. While they should not do
it for software backed pools.

Such flag would also help when multiple pools are being handled by
a PMD, saving costly compare operations for any internal marker.

Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
---
 lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h
index 991feaa..91dbd21 100644
--- a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h
+++ b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h
@@ -263,6 +263,11 @@ struct rte_mempool {
 #define MEMPOOL_F_SC_GET         0x0008 /**< Default get is "single-consumer".*/
 #define MEMPOOL_F_POOL_CREATED   0x0010 /**< Internal: pool is created. */
 #define MEMPOOL_F_NO_PHYS_CONTIG 0x0020 /**< Don't need physically contiguous objs. */
+#define MEMPOOL_F_HW_POOL        (1 << ((sizeof(int) * 8) - 1)) /**< Internal:
+	* Hardware offloaded pool. This information may be used by the
+	* NIC or other hw. Some NICs autonomously free the HW backed pool packets. */
+
+/**< Don't need physically contiguous objs. */
 
 /**
  * @internal When debug is enabled, store some statistics.
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH] mempool: introduce flag to indicate hw mempool

[Olivier Matz]

Hi Hemant,

On Mon, 3 Apr 2017 14:42:09 +0530, Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> wrote:
> Hardware pools need to distinguish between buffers allocated using
> software or hardware backed pools.
> 
> Some HW NICs may choose to autonomously free the pickets during
> transmit if the packet is from HW pool. While they should not do
> it for software backed pools.
> 
> Such flag would also help when multiple pools are being handled by
> a PMD, saving costly compare operations for any internal marker.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h
> index 991feaa..91dbd21 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h
> @@ -263,6 +263,11 @@ struct rte_mempool {
>  #define MEMPOOL_F_SC_GET         0x0008 /**< Default get is "single-consumer".*/
>  #define MEMPOOL_F_POOL_CREATED   0x0010 /**< Internal: pool is created. */
>  #define MEMPOOL_F_NO_PHYS_CONTIG 0x0020 /**< Don't need physically contiguous objs. */
> +#define MEMPOOL_F_HW_POOL        (1 << ((sizeof(int) * 8) - 1)) /**< Internal:
> +	* Hardware offloaded pool. This information may be used by the
> +	* NIC or other hw. Some NICs autonomously free the HW backed pool packets. */
> +
> +/**< Don't need physically contiguous objs. */
>  
>  /**
>   * @internal When debug is enabled, store some statistics.


One thing is still not clear to me: in your driver, you check this flag:
- if it is unset, you reallocate a packet from your hw pool, you copy
  some metadata, and you send it to the hw.
- if it is set, you assume that you can call mempool_to_bpid(mp) and directly
  send it to the hw.

I think this is not correct. The test you want to do in your driver is:
"is it the pool that I registered for my hardware"?
It is not:
"is it a hardware managed pool?".

I think what you are doing here prevents to use 2 hardware mempools
at the same time, because they would all have this flag, and mempool_to_bpid()
would probably crash.

Instead, can't you just compare the mempool pointer to a value stored internally
in the driver?

Olivier

Re: [PATCH] mempool: introduce flag to indicate hw mempool

[Hemant Agrawal]

Hi Olivier,

On 4/3/2017 8:49 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> Hi Hemant,
>
> On Mon, 3 Apr 2017 14:42:09 +0530, Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> wrote:
>> Hardware pools need to distinguish between buffers allocated using
>> software or hardware backed pools.
>>
>> Some HW NICs may choose to autonomously free the pickets during
>> transmit if the packet is from HW pool. While they should not do
>> it for software backed pools.
>>
>> Such flag would also help when multiple pools are being handled by
>> a PMD, saving costly compare operations for any internal marker.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
>> ---
>>  lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h | 5 +++++
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h
>> index 991feaa..91dbd21 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h
>> +++ b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h
>> @@ -263,6 +263,11 @@ struct rte_mempool {
>>  #define MEMPOOL_F_SC_GET         0x0008 /**< Default get is "single-consumer".*/
>>  #define MEMPOOL_F_POOL_CREATED   0x0010 /**< Internal: pool is created. */
>>  #define MEMPOOL_F_NO_PHYS_CONTIG 0x0020 /**< Don't need physically contiguous objs. */
>> +#define MEMPOOL_F_HW_POOL        (1 << ((sizeof(int) * 8) - 1)) /**< Internal:
>> +	* Hardware offloaded pool. This information may be used by the
>> +	* NIC or other hw. Some NICs autonomously free the HW backed pool packets. */
>> +
>> +/**< Don't need physically contiguous objs. */
>>
>>  /**
>>   * @internal When debug is enabled, store some statistics.
>
>
> One thing is still not clear to me: in your driver, you check this flag:
> - if it is unset, you reallocate a packet from your hw pool, you copy
>   some metadata, and you send it to the hw.
> - if it is set, you assume that you can call mempool_to_bpid(mp) and directly
>   send it to the hw.
>
> I think this is not correct. The test you want to do in your driver is:
> "is it the pool that I registered for my hardware"?
> It is not:
> "is it a hardware managed pool?".
> I think what you are doing here prevents to use 2 hardware mempools
> at the same time, because they would all have this flag, and mempool_to_bpid()
> would probably crash.
>

No, I am only trying to differentiate between hw and software pool 
packets. I don't see a possiblity of having two different orthogonal hw 
mempool types working in the system. At any point of time when you are 
running DPDK on a particular type of hardware, you will only have *one* 
type of hardware backed pools in your implementation.  The number of 
mempool instances may be many but all will able to work with 
mempool_to_bpid().


The application may send packet allocated from a *ring* pool instead of 
using "hw" pool.


So, it is sufficient to just check if the pool is offloaded or not. HW 
can take care of all the supported pools.

> Instead, can't you just compare the mempool pointer to a value stored internally
> in the driver?

There can be more than one instance of mempool, the driver is capable of 
supporting multiple hw offloaded mempools. Each dpaa2 PMD port may have 
different mempool instance registered.

So, pointer comparison is not practical unless I start storing the 
mempool driver pointer.

I guess, we are going into long discussion about how the hw mempool works.

If you are still not convinced, will any of the following works for you:

1. As proposed, A generic hw managaged pool flag - I don't see any issue 
with it.
2. A specific flag - *MEMPOOL_F_HW_DPAA2* - There are instances where 
driver specific flags are added to lib.
3. Maintaining this flag within the  dpaa2 driver at the risk of it 
being overwritten by the application.  This will be temporary, till we 
arrive to a solution.


> Olivier
>

Re: [PATCH] mempool: introduce flag to indicate hw mempool

[Thomas Monjalon]

2017-04-04 11:05, Hemant Agrawal:
> Hi Olivier,
> 
> On 4/3/2017 8:49 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> > Hi Hemant,
> >
> > On Mon, 3 Apr 2017 14:42:09 +0530, Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> wrote:
> >> Hardware pools need to distinguish between buffers allocated using
> >> software or hardware backed pools.
> >>
> >> Some HW NICs may choose to autonomously free the pickets during
> >> transmit if the packet is from HW pool. While they should not do
> >> it for software backed pools.
> >>
> >> Such flag would also help when multiple pools are being handled by
> >> a PMD, saving costly compare operations for any internal marker.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
> >> ---
> >>  lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h | 5 +++++
> >>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h
> >> index 991feaa..91dbd21 100644
> >> --- a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h
> >> +++ b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h
> >> @@ -263,6 +263,11 @@ struct rte_mempool {
> >>  #define MEMPOOL_F_SC_GET         0x0008 /**< Default get is "single-consumer".*/
> >>  #define MEMPOOL_F_POOL_CREATED   0x0010 /**< Internal: pool is created. */
> >>  #define MEMPOOL_F_NO_PHYS_CONTIG 0x0020 /**< Don't need physically contiguous objs. */
> >> +#define MEMPOOL_F_HW_POOL        (1 << ((sizeof(int) * 8) - 1)) /**< Internal:
> >> +	* Hardware offloaded pool. This information may be used by the
> >> +	* NIC or other hw. Some NICs autonomously free the HW backed pool packets. */
> >> +
> >> +/**< Don't need physically contiguous objs. */
> >>
> >>  /**
> >>   * @internal When debug is enabled, store some statistics.
> >
> >
> > One thing is still not clear to me: in your driver, you check this flag:
> > - if it is unset, you reallocate a packet from your hw pool, you copy
> >   some metadata, and you send it to the hw.
> > - if it is set, you assume that you can call mempool_to_bpid(mp) and directly
> >   send it to the hw.
> >
> > I think this is not correct. The test you want to do in your driver is:
> > "is it the pool that I registered for my hardware"?
> > It is not:
> > "is it a hardware managed pool?".
> > I think what you are doing here prevents to use 2 hardware mempools
> > at the same time, because they would all have this flag, and mempool_to_bpid()
> > would probably crash.
> >
> 
> No, I am only trying to differentiate between hw and software pool 
> packets. I don't see a possiblity of having two different orthogonal hw 
> mempool types working in the system. At any point of time when you are 
> running DPDK on a particular type of hardware, you will only have *one* 
> type of hardware backed pools in your implementation.  The number of 
> mempool instances may be many but all will able to work with 
> mempool_to_bpid().

No you could have different HW mempools on one system.
Please imagine PCI NICs which provide a mempool.
(other argument: never say never ;)

> The application may send packet allocated from a *ring* pool instead of 
> using "hw" pool.
> 
> So, it is sufficient to just check if the pool is offloaded or not. HW 
> can take care of all the supported pools.
> 
> > Instead, can't you just compare the mempool pointer to a value stored internally
> > in the driver?
> 
> There can be more than one instance of mempool, the driver is capable of 
> supporting multiple hw offloaded mempools. Each dpaa2 PMD port may have 
> different mempool instance registered.
> 
> So, pointer comparison is not practical unless I start storing the 
> mempool driver pointer.

Is it difficult to store this pointer?

Re: [PATCH] mempool: introduce flag to indicate hw mempool

[Hemant Agrawal]

Hi Thomas/Olivier,

On 4/4/2017 12:28 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2017-04-04 11:05, Hemant Agrawal:
>> Hi Olivier,
>>
>> On 4/3/2017 8:49 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:
>>> Hi Hemant,
>>>
>>> On Mon, 3 Apr 2017 14:42:09 +0530, Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> wrote:
>>>> Hardware pools need to distinguish between buffers allocated using
>>>> software or hardware backed pools.
>>>>
>>>> Some HW NICs may choose to autonomously free the pickets during
>>>> transmit if the packet is from HW pool. While they should not do
>>>> it for software backed pools.
>>>>
>>>> Such flag would also help when multiple pools are being handled by
>>>> a PMD, saving costly compare operations for any internal marker.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h | 5 +++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h
>>>> index 991feaa..91dbd21 100644
>>>> --- a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h
>>>> +++ b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h
>>>> @@ -263,6 +263,11 @@ struct rte_mempool {
>>>>  #define MEMPOOL_F_SC_GET         0x0008 /**< Default get is "single-consumer".*/
>>>>  #define MEMPOOL_F_POOL_CREATED   0x0010 /**< Internal: pool is created. */
>>>>  #define MEMPOOL_F_NO_PHYS_CONTIG 0x0020 /**< Don't need physically contiguous objs. */
>>>> +#define MEMPOOL_F_HW_POOL        (1 << ((sizeof(int) * 8) - 1)) /**< Internal:
>>>> +	* Hardware offloaded pool. This information may be used by the
>>>> +	* NIC or other hw. Some NICs autonomously free the HW backed pool packets. */
>>>> +
>>>> +/**< Don't need physically contiguous objs. */
>>>>
>>>>  /**
>>>>   * @internal When debug is enabled, store some statistics.
>>>
>>>
>>> One thing is still not clear to me: in your driver, you check this flag:
>>> - if it is unset, you reallocate a packet from your hw pool, you copy
>>>   some metadata, and you send it to the hw.
>>> - if it is set, you assume that you can call mempool_to_bpid(mp) and directly
>>>   send it to the hw.
>>>
>>> I think this is not correct. The test you want to do in your driver is:
>>> "is it the pool that I registered for my hardware"?
>>> It is not:
>>> "is it a hardware managed pool?".
>>> I think what you are doing here prevents to use 2 hardware mempools
>>> at the same time, because they would all have this flag, and mempool_to_bpid()
>>> would probably crash.
>>>
>>
>> No, I am only trying to differentiate between hw and software pool
>> packets. I don't see a possiblity of having two different orthogonal hw
>> mempool types working in the system. At any point of time when you are
>> running DPDK on a particular type of hardware, you will only have *one*
>> type of hardware backed pools in your implementation.  The number of
>> mempool instances may be many but all will able to work with
>> mempool_to_bpid().
>
> No you could have different HW mempools on one system.
> Please imagine PCI NICs which provide a mempool.
> (other argument: never say never ;)
>
Thanks. Good Advice :)

>> The application may send packet allocated from a *ring* pool instead of
>> using "hw" pool.
>>
>> So, it is sufficient to just check if the pool is offloaded or not. HW
>> can take care of all the supported pools.
>>
>>> Instead, can't you just compare the mempool pointer to a value stored internally
>>> in the driver?
>>
>> There can be more than one instance of mempool, the driver is capable of
>> supporting multiple hw offloaded mempools. Each dpaa2 PMD port may have
>> different mempool instance registered.
>>
>> So, pointer comparison is not practical unless I start storing the
>> mempool driver pointer.
>
> Is it difficult to store this pointer?
>

Yes! Something is workable here.
PMD stores the "rte_mempool_ops_table" ops_index for dpaa2 (the default 
buffer pool). The mbuf contains the pool pointer, which will also have 
the pool->ops_index. so, it can be compared on per packet basis.

Olivier, do you see any issue with above approach.

>

Re: [PATCH] mempool: introduce flag to indicate hw mempool

[Olivier MATZ]

On Tue, 04 Apr 2017 08:58:40 +0200
Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> wrote:

> 2017-04-04 11:05, Hemant Agrawal:
> > Hi Olivier,
> > 
> > On 4/3/2017 8:49 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:  
> > > Hi Hemant,
> > >
> > > On Mon, 3 Apr 2017 14:42:09 +0530, Hemant Agrawal
> > > <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> wrote:  
> > >> Hardware pools need to distinguish between buffers allocated
> > >> using software or hardware backed pools.
> > >>
> > >> Some HW NICs may choose to autonomously free the pickets during
> > >> transmit if the packet is from HW pool. While they should not do
> > >> it for software backed pools.
> > >>
> > >> Such flag would also help when multiple pools are being handled
> > >> by a PMD, saving costly compare operations for any internal
> > >> marker.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
> > >> ---
> > >>  lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h | 5 +++++
> > >>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h
> > >> b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h index 991feaa..91dbd21 100644
> > >> --- a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h
> > >> +++ b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h
> > >> @@ -263,6 +263,11 @@ struct rte_mempool {
> > >>  #define MEMPOOL_F_SC_GET         0x0008 /**< Default get is
> > >> "single-consumer".*/ #define MEMPOOL_F_POOL_CREATED
> > >> 0x0010 /**< Internal: pool is created. */ #define
> > >> MEMPOOL_F_NO_PHYS_CONTIG 0x0020 /**< Don't need physically
> > >> contiguous objs. */ +#define MEMPOOL_F_HW_POOL        (1 <<
> > >> ((sizeof(int) * 8) - 1)) /**< Internal:
> > >> +	* Hardware offloaded pool. This information may be used
> > >> by the
> > >> +	* NIC or other hw. Some NICs autonomously free the HW
> > >> backed pool packets. */ +
> > >> +/**< Don't need physically contiguous objs. */
> > >>
> > >>  /**
> > >>   * @internal When debug is enabled, store some statistics.  
> > >
> > >
> > > One thing is still not clear to me: in your driver, you check
> > > this flag:
> > > - if it is unset, you reallocate a packet from your hw pool, you
> > > copy some metadata, and you send it to the hw.
> > > - if it is set, you assume that you can call mempool_to_bpid(mp)
> > > and directly send it to the hw.
> > >
> > > I think this is not correct. The test you want to do in your
> > > driver is: "is it the pool that I registered for my hardware"?
> > > It is not:
> > > "is it a hardware managed pool?".
> > > I think what you are doing here prevents to use 2 hardware
> > > mempools at the same time, because they would all have this flag,
> > > and mempool_to_bpid() would probably crash.
> > >  
> > 
> > No, I am only trying to differentiate between hw and software pool 
> > packets. I don't see a possiblity of having two different
> > orthogonal hw mempool types working in the system. At any point of
> > time when you are running DPDK on a particular type of hardware,
> > you will only have *one* type of hardware backed pools in your
> > implementation.  The number of mempool instances may be many but
> > all will able to work with mempool_to_bpid().  
> 
> No you could have different HW mempools on one system.
> Please imagine PCI NICs which provide a mempool.
> (other argument: never say never ;)
> 
> > The application may send packet allocated from a *ring* pool
> > instead of using "hw" pool.
> > 
> > So, it is sufficient to just check if the pool is offloaded or not.
> > HW can take care of all the supported pools.
> >   
> > > Instead, can't you just compare the mempool pointer to a value
> > > stored internally in the driver?  
> > 
> > There can be more than one instance of mempool, the driver is
> > capable of supporting multiple hw offloaded mempools. Each dpaa2
> > PMD port may have different mempool instance registered.
> > 
> > So, pointer comparison is not practical unless I start storing the 
> > mempool driver pointer.  
> 
> Is it difficult to store this pointer?
> 

Another idea which looks even better: what about comparing
mempool->ops_index to a value stored in the driver at init?

I think it describes exactly what you want: the mempool type is *your*
hardware mempool type.

Re: [PATCH] mempool: introduce flag to indicate hw mempool

[Olivier MATZ]

Hi Hemant,

On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 12:59:08 +0530
Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> wrote:

> Hi Thomas/Olivier,
> 
> On 4/4/2017 12:28 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2017-04-04 11:05, Hemant Agrawal:  
> >> Hi Olivier,
> >>
> >> On 4/3/2017 8:49 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:  
> >>> Hi Hemant,
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, 3 Apr 2017 14:42:09 +0530, Hemant Agrawal
> >>> <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> wrote:  
> >>>> Hardware pools need to distinguish between buffers allocated
> >>>> using software or hardware backed pools.
> >>>>
> >>>> Some HW NICs may choose to autonomously free the pickets during
> >>>> transmit if the packet is from HW pool. While they should not do
> >>>> it for software backed pools.
> >>>>
> >>>> Such flag would also help when multiple pools are being handled
> >>>> by a PMD, saving costly compare operations for any internal
> >>>> marker.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>  lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h | 5 +++++
> >>>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h
> >>>> b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h index 991feaa..91dbd21 100644
> >>>> --- a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h
> >>>> +++ b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h
> >>>> @@ -263,6 +263,11 @@ struct rte_mempool {
> >>>>  #define MEMPOOL_F_SC_GET         0x0008 /**< Default get is
> >>>> "single-consumer".*/ #define MEMPOOL_F_POOL_CREATED
> >>>> 0x0010 /**< Internal: pool is created. */ #define
> >>>> MEMPOOL_F_NO_PHYS_CONTIG 0x0020 /**< Don't need physically
> >>>> contiguous objs. */ +#define MEMPOOL_F_HW_POOL        (1 <<
> >>>> ((sizeof(int) * 8) - 1)) /**< Internal:
> >>>> +	* Hardware offloaded pool. This information may be used
> >>>> by the
> >>>> +	* NIC or other hw. Some NICs autonomously free the HW
> >>>> backed pool packets. */ +
> >>>> +/**< Don't need physically contiguous objs. */
> >>>>
> >>>>  /**
> >>>>   * @internal When debug is enabled, store some statistics.  
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> One thing is still not clear to me: in your driver, you check
> >>> this flag:
> >>> - if it is unset, you reallocate a packet from your hw pool, you
> >>> copy some metadata, and you send it to the hw.
> >>> - if it is set, you assume that you can call mempool_to_bpid(mp)
> >>> and directly send it to the hw.
> >>>
> >>> I think this is not correct. The test you want to do in your
> >>> driver is: "is it the pool that I registered for my hardware"?
> >>> It is not:
> >>> "is it a hardware managed pool?".
> >>> I think what you are doing here prevents to use 2 hardware
> >>> mempools at the same time, because they would all have this flag,
> >>> and mempool_to_bpid() would probably crash.
> >>>  
> >>
> >> No, I am only trying to differentiate between hw and software pool
> >> packets. I don't see a possiblity of having two different
> >> orthogonal hw mempool types working in the system. At any point of
> >> time when you are running DPDK on a particular type of hardware,
> >> you will only have *one* type of hardware backed pools in your
> >> implementation.  The number of mempool instances may be many but
> >> all will able to work with mempool_to_bpid().  
> >
> > No you could have different HW mempools on one system.
> > Please imagine PCI NICs which provide a mempool.
> > (other argument: never say never ;)
> >  
> Thanks. Good Advice :)
> 
> >> The application may send packet allocated from a *ring* pool
> >> instead of using "hw" pool.
> >>
> >> So, it is sufficient to just check if the pool is offloaded or
> >> not. HW can take care of all the supported pools.
> >>  
> >>> Instead, can't you just compare the mempool pointer to a value
> >>> stored internally in the driver?  
> >>
> >> There can be more than one instance of mempool, the driver is
> >> capable of supporting multiple hw offloaded mempools. Each dpaa2
> >> PMD port may have different mempool instance registered.
> >>
> >> So, pointer comparison is not practical unless I start storing the
> >> mempool driver pointer.  
> >
> > Is it difficult to store this pointer?
> >  
> 
> Yes! Something is workable here.
> PMD stores the "rte_mempool_ops_table" ops_index for dpaa2 (the
> default buffer pool). The mbuf contains the pool pointer, which will
> also have the pool->ops_index. so, it can be compared on per packet
> basis.
> 
> Olivier, do you see any issue with above approach.
> 

Sorry I missed this mail. Yes, I think this approach should work.

Olivier