All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
To: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] btrfs: zoned: make auto-reclaim less aggressive
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 08:08:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d4e31fe56800bdc3bd8ed9230c6a5629ee555cd5.1647268601.git.johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> (raw)

The current auto-reclaim algorithm starts reclaiming all block-group's
with a zone_unusable value above a configured threshold. This is causing a
lot of reclaim IO even if there would be enough free zones on the device.

Instead of only accounting a block-group's zone_unusable value, also take
the number of empty zones into account.

Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>

---
Changes since RFC:
* Fix logic error
* Skip unavailable devices
* Use different metric working for non-zoned devices as well
---
 fs/btrfs/block-group.c |  3 +++
 fs/btrfs/zoned.c       | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 fs/btrfs/zoned.h       |  6 ++++++
 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
index c22d287e020b..2e77b38c538b 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
@@ -1522,6 +1522,9 @@ void btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	if (!test_bit(BTRFS_FS_OPEN, &fs_info->flags))
 		return;
 
+	if (!btrfs_zoned_should_reclaim(fs_info))
+		return;
+
 	sb_start_write(fs_info->sb);
 
 	if (!btrfs_exclop_start(fs_info, BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE)) {
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/zoned.c b/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
index 49446bb5a5d1..e60fa3c9be7c 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 #include "transaction.h"
 #include "dev-replace.h"
 #include "space-info.h"
+#include "misc.h"
 
 /* Maximum number of zones to report per blkdev_report_zones() call */
 #define BTRFS_REPORT_NR_ZONES   4096
@@ -2078,3 +2079,32 @@ void btrfs_free_zone_cache(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
 	}
 	mutex_unlock(&fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
 }
+
+bool btrfs_zoned_should_reclaim(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
+{
+	struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices = fs_info->fs_devices;
+	struct btrfs_device *device;
+	u64 bytes_used = 0;
+	u64 total_bytes = 0;
+	u64 factor;
+
+	if (!btrfs_is_zoned(fs_info))
+		return false;
+
+	if (!fs_info->bg_reclaim_threshold)
+		return false;
+
+	mutex_lock(&fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
+	list_for_each_entry(device, &fs_devices->devices, dev_list) {
+		if (!device->bdev)
+			continue;
+
+		total_bytes += device->disk_total_bytes;
+		bytes_used += device->bytes_used;
+
+	}
+	mutex_unlock(&fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
+
+	factor = (bytes_used * 100) / total_bytes;
+	return factor >= fs_info->bg_reclaim_threshold;
+}
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/zoned.h b/fs/btrfs/zoned.h
index cbf016a7bb5d..d0d0e5c02606 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/zoned.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/zoned.h
@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ void btrfs_zone_finish_endio(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 logical,
 			     u64 length);
 void btrfs_clear_data_reloc_bg(struct btrfs_block_group *bg);
 void btrfs_free_zone_cache(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
+bool btrfs_zoned_should_reclaim(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
 #else /* CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED */
 static inline int btrfs_get_dev_zone(struct btrfs_device *device, u64 pos,
 				     struct blk_zone *zone)
@@ -236,6 +237,11 @@ static inline void btrfs_zone_finish_endio(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 static inline void btrfs_clear_data_reloc_bg(struct btrfs_block_group *bg) { }
 
 static inline void btrfs_free_zone_cache(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) { }
+
+static inline bool btrfs_zoned_should_reclaim(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
+{
+	return false;
+}
 #endif
 
 static inline bool btrfs_dev_is_sequential(struct btrfs_device *device, u64 pos)
-- 
2.35.1


             reply	other threads:[~2022-03-14 15:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-14 15:08 Johannes Thumshirn [this message]
2022-03-14 21:40 ` [PATCH v2] btrfs: zoned: make auto-reclaim less aggressive kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d4e31fe56800bdc3bd8ed9230c6a5629ee555cd5.1647268601.git.johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
    --to=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.