From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A06C433FE for ; Fri, 20 May 2022 15:20:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1350724AbiETPUo (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 May 2022 11:20:44 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51498 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234738AbiETPUl (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 May 2022 11:20:41 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x62d.google.com (mail-ej1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7F791778B7; Fri, 20 May 2022 08:20:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id wh22so16073391ejb.7; Fri, 20 May 2022 08:20:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9HTaK+V9ZiDiK1i2vlbbpCkD2/xh0tAla8E3HggozQY=; b=BSRx5Z5tm6wPBmbRw+L6iv01M0mxWLakRDU1Fshi/8cmtyCW4nFYuwEkMsA0aB97EE FzB+3peMTk26SJTMrCkSv+puJddtXwM49ZIGWCdN1QxR8e3yej/b+YWFD/vRUDx+9i66 NkLXYs7UkS+pZRRO6RoCHTqrMkTXw+ZJFF9LcIIMAJQKcl6EflIjSQmReXIL9z5bXlzP 0txnvAar7jb+VjuGOAfsOayrcNl0Hdc5lUCUY9yIVu9+gnuvSVSmBcbuckSY5D8rCjsD llXpQSG0MsUA90jGpHxJV6lDBM7Oxi8LCSuJVwU2jpCeTzac+6MHNZp0yVUMj7MX9AsP d73w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent :subject:content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9HTaK+V9ZiDiK1i2vlbbpCkD2/xh0tAla8E3HggozQY=; b=nKU48s+NGaM29ugH3B2XfgI4QFW4qOE9KT/+pDFUIlK/NqukBs2gaSgXajFstF2DO1 668dR2U+O27etDu4VFpWKy5UFqG0hNg5ck1DtEYIXMzbssyXnLTcyCd91vBfmeHOa3rC GgAkkIJ2pbjgSCT9lgVVSd5dfqLEiKuMEtBOVbeOzJ1RMYCZ98XUjKMfGJn4IOTpP9Xw L3EZ1L7BZ9m55gfMR7S8T8mAaEPVqgl41f5ZiTfm0EQEM2JHDONBWSj/PPMDvIp0WT9B 09Ws7fS63n/1gPlNmvlP72VVx3fOWPIUdcyjuhfOjZPUhYVQ1gf0V/LnFeghOmIZIWZs 35Cg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532kEgJA6nSRP5bJjpFOg/lVMIFM/niWT7JgEGm0JUKBcc3JKnqh UNvO7c50ZSbf5sMEHQV7dnQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwSFrnTnzwIxD4CF5hQegGI00d/gtJIbpbGQ9sMCHRp8qU0jBb9OAfnyXhm0w5TWxxsrDX48A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:6d8a:b0:6fe:1b36:dfcc with SMTP id sb10-20020a1709076d8a00b006fe1b36dfccmr9038948ejc.579.1653060039247; Fri, 20 May 2022 08:20:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id el22-20020a170907285600b006f3ef214e57sm3203545ejc.189.2022.05.20.08.20.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 20 May 2022 08:20:38 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 17:20:37 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 11/11] KVM: x86/pmu: Drop amd_event_mapping[] in the KVM context Content-Language: en-US To: Like Xu Cc: Sean Christopherson , Jim Mattson , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Joerg Roedel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org References: <20220518132512.37864-1-likexu@tencent.com> <20220518132512.37864-12-likexu@tencent.com> <3d30f1ac-558f-0ce6-3d46-e223f117899b@redhat.com> <6b30a3bc-9509-d506-4f81-2db0baeedad2@gmail.com> From: Paolo Bonzini In-Reply-To: <6b30a3bc-9509-d506-4f81-2db0baeedad2@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 5/20/22 16:27, Like Xu wrote: > >> >> Apart from patch 3, the series looks good. I'll probably delay it >> to 5.20 so that you can confirm the SRCU issue, but it's queued. > > I have checked it's protected under srcu_read_lock/unlock() for > existing usages, so did JimM. > > TBH, patch 3 is only inspired by the fact why the protection against > kvm->arch.msr_filter does not appear for kvm->arch.pmu_event_filter, > and my limited searching scope has not yet confirmed whether it > prevents the same spider. Ok, I'll drop it. Paolo