From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261375AbUHGKie (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Aug 2004 06:38:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261405AbUHGKie (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Aug 2004 06:38:34 -0400 Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.202]:42389 "EHLO mproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261375AbUHGKia (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Aug 2004 06:38:30 -0400 Message-ID: Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 06:38:24 -0400 From: Patrick McFarland To: Jari Ruusu Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.8-rc3 - BSD licensing Cc: Linus Torvalds , Fruhwirth Clemens , James Morris , Kernel Mailing List , "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <4114AC9D.B63C00C0@users.sourceforge.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <1091644663.21675.51.camel@ghanima> <1091647612.24215.12.camel@ghanima> <411228FF.485E4D07@users.sourceforge.net> <411353B3.B8748556@users.sourceforge.net> <4114AC9D.B63C00C0@users.sourceforge.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ouch. I knew Linus was right all along. ;) However, Jari, you can still request people not use your code in a not legally enforcable way; and I'm sure Linus would have followed that request. But thankfully, we can use your code, and it's just a moot point. On Sat, 07 Aug 2004 13:19:09 +0300, Jari Ruusu wrote: > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Fri, 6 Aug 2004, Jari Ruusu wrote: > > > Linus, you are mixing two completely different rights here; > > > re-distribution right and re-licensing right. > > > > Ehh.. You're wrong. > > Yep. I goofed. > > > You haven't even read the GPL, have you? > > I read it in 1995. Obviously too many years have passed since then. > > > So when you claim that the code isn't GPL-compatible, and at the same time > > claim that we can't re-license it under the GPL, you are very very > > confused indeed. Either it is GPL-compatible, or it is not. And if it is > > GPL-compatible, that ABSOLUTELY means that it can be relicensed under the > > GPL. > > Yep. I don't have any other choice here than to permit re-licencing the > code. My 04-Aug-2004 18:04:46 +0300 posting where I denied re-licencing > right was completely wrong. I'm sorry about that. > > For loop-AES users I uploaded a patch here that updates licenses to be > GPL-compatible: http://loop-aes.sourceforge.net/updates/aes-GPL.diff > > > > -- > Jari Ruusu 1024R/3A220F51 5B 4B F9 BB D3 3F 52 E9 DB 1D EB E3 24 0E A9 DD > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland || diablod3@gmail.com "Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to repetitive electronic music." -- Kristian Wilson, Nintendo, Inc, 1989