From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D73EFC433E0 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 08:03:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57F42068E for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 08:03:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="Aq1ntnpB" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728842AbgFOIDk (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2020 04:03:40 -0400 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]:57430 "EHLO fllv0015.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728505AbgFOIDk (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2020 04:03:40 -0400 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05F83Pf9008385; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 03:03:25 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1592208205; bh=Uk+sr31sgCXRnh6PktSit7kYbZ3ovLU3+zbv2SOX1s0=; h=Subject:From:To:CC:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Aq1ntnpBIbSFrlciefSobaz+dLVpHV2kpLTHqx+3vhzEgci69C74ga154PpfaAtAh oYmkcndvSeIZ7XePbT8IWI4EUTY3PBSqyA7tjr5sWJWcYy+7BFw0G0KT3Nbyrlmwnb 7IanqCL+dYZWkUp3eAbiS1+JJBnd71A6R/t7EHNM= Received: from DFLE100.ent.ti.com (dfle100.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.21]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05F83PQO003489 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 15 Jun 2020 03:03:25 -0500 Received: from DFLE108.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.29) by DFLE100.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 03:03:25 -0500 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DFLE108.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 03:03:25 -0500 Received: from [10.24.69.20] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05F83LeO018322; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 03:03:22 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] dt-bindings: irqchip: ti, sci-intr: Update bindings to drop the usage of gic as parent From: Lokesh Vutla To: Marc Zyngier CC: Nishanth Menon , Rob Herring , Grygorii Strashko , Device Tree Mailing List , Tero Kristo , Sekhar Nori , Peter Ujfalusi , Santosh Shilimkar , Thomas Gleixner , Linux ARM Mailing List References: <20200520124454.10532-1-lokeshvutla@ti.com> <20200520124454.10532-5-lokeshvutla@ti.com> <20200528221406.GA769073@bogus> <4ea8c6110a16900220a65f1d44145146@kernel.org> <3f253e25-2ee7-96f2-3158-7f6be0710a33@ti.com> Message-ID: Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 13:33:20 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3f253e25-2ee7-96f2-3158-7f6be0710a33@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Marc, On 01/06/20 5:06 pm, Lokesh Vutla wrote: > Hi Marc, > > On 29/05/20 3:48 pm, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> On 2020-05-29 11:14, Lokesh Vutla wrote: >>> Hi Rob, >>> >>> On 29/05/20 3:44 am, Rob Herring wrote: >>>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 06:14:46PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote: >>>>> Drop the firmware related dt-bindings and use the hardware specified >>>>> interrupt numbers within Interrupt Router. This ensures interrupt router >>>>> DT node need not assume any interrupt parent type. >>>> >>>> I didn't like this binding to begin with, but now you're breaking >>>> compatibility. >>> >>> Yes, I do agree that this change is breaking backward compatibility. But IMHO, >>> this does cleanup of firmware specific properties from DT. Since this is not >>> deployed out yet in the wild market, I took the leverage of breaking backward >>> compatibility. Before accepting these changes from firmware team, I did >>> discuss[0] with Marc on this topic. >> >> And I assume that should anyone complain about the kernel being broken >> because they have an old firmware, you'll be OK with the patches being >> reverted, right? > > I am assuming there is no one to complain as there is no product available yet > with upstream kernel. Internally everyone is aware of the changes. So, yes I > would agree with you to revert the changes if someone really needs it. :) Any chance you can shower your blessings on this series :) Thanks and regards, Lokesh > > Thanks and regards, > Lokesh > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF7BC433E0 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 08:04:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1F4C2067B for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 08:04:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="cfunSJij"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="Aq1ntnpB" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D1F4C2067B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:References:To:From:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description :Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=a3rtL+bmE2w4VHEOYBAG051QfiACKfYQIAvadni01e8=; b=cfunSJij7Pqeqq lVhMlI8isPsVkGn024adsM13igfGmjj8xRuk4MVJi8vQAhD8A7K8PnkmN/yeAswWlUyN+qZXWkz2k nbaVEqMoYazsngWa8YSQOBVsR+0jxjkekes8jPFoYoUN4QUCaz91DR2VH3dWtXsesMRTMEXS4VFpr SwIm74wtowML568KNC1ybteCnUb5DXKor219hXQC5c8HpQMiGCSlM4MhARWgWNhr5CoEIhSumkxx+ plJwQ6ufzRAnxLodlM8NBuYHhdZXgNNtsc0IpHNInJgxcXJK2bwCnQUNYdC3bUY01h8jWTUnwRj5q YpKmlRcp7gf6WiqURVQA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jkk6a-0008Nz-5M; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 08:04:32 +0000 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jkk5h-0007WD-JP for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 08:03:39 +0000 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05F83Pf9008385; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 03:03:25 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1592208205; bh=Uk+sr31sgCXRnh6PktSit7kYbZ3ovLU3+zbv2SOX1s0=; h=Subject:From:To:CC:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Aq1ntnpBIbSFrlciefSobaz+dLVpHV2kpLTHqx+3vhzEgci69C74ga154PpfaAtAh oYmkcndvSeIZ7XePbT8IWI4EUTY3PBSqyA7tjr5sWJWcYy+7BFw0G0KT3Nbyrlmwnb 7IanqCL+dYZWkUp3eAbiS1+JJBnd71A6R/t7EHNM= Received: from DFLE100.ent.ti.com (dfle100.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.21]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05F83PQO003489 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 15 Jun 2020 03:03:25 -0500 Received: from DFLE108.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.29) by DFLE100.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 03:03:25 -0500 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DFLE108.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 03:03:25 -0500 Received: from [10.24.69.20] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05F83LeO018322; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 03:03:22 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] dt-bindings: irqchip: ti, sci-intr: Update bindings to drop the usage of gic as parent From: Lokesh Vutla To: Marc Zyngier References: <20200520124454.10532-1-lokeshvutla@ti.com> <20200520124454.10532-5-lokeshvutla@ti.com> <20200528221406.GA769073@bogus> <4ea8c6110a16900220a65f1d44145146@kernel.org> <3f253e25-2ee7-96f2-3158-7f6be0710a33@ti.com> Message-ID: Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 13:33:20 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3f253e25-2ee7-96f2-3158-7f6be0710a33@ti.com> Content-Language: en-US X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200615_010337_741537_E5D51486 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.63 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Nishanth Menon , Rob Herring , Grygorii Strashko , Peter Ujfalusi , Device Tree Mailing List , Sekhar Nori , Tero Kristo , Santosh Shilimkar , Thomas Gleixner , Linux ARM Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Marc, On 01/06/20 5:06 pm, Lokesh Vutla wrote: > Hi Marc, > > On 29/05/20 3:48 pm, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> On 2020-05-29 11:14, Lokesh Vutla wrote: >>> Hi Rob, >>> >>> On 29/05/20 3:44 am, Rob Herring wrote: >>>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 06:14:46PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote: >>>>> Drop the firmware related dt-bindings and use the hardware specified >>>>> interrupt numbers within Interrupt Router. This ensures interrupt router >>>>> DT node need not assume any interrupt parent type. >>>> >>>> I didn't like this binding to begin with, but now you're breaking >>>> compatibility. >>> >>> Yes, I do agree that this change is breaking backward compatibility. But IMHO, >>> this does cleanup of firmware specific properties from DT. Since this is not >>> deployed out yet in the wild market, I took the leverage of breaking backward >>> compatibility. Before accepting these changes from firmware team, I did >>> discuss[0] with Marc on this topic. >> >> And I assume that should anyone complain about the kernel being broken >> because they have an old firmware, you'll be OK with the patches being >> reverted, right? > > I am assuming there is no one to complain as there is no product available yet > with upstream kernel. Internally everyone is aware of the changes. So, yes I > would agree with you to revert the changes if someone really needs it. :) Any chance you can shower your blessings on this series :) Thanks and regards, Lokesh > > Thanks and regards, > Lokesh > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel