Re: [PATCH] Config: use Mini-OS master for xen-unstable

[Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1651 bytes --]

On 01.09.21 10:59, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 31.08.2021 09:30, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> In order to get Mini-OS master branch tested by OSStest, use it for
>> xen-unstable.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
>> ---
>> There are some Mini-OS patches pending, of which at least the Mini-OS
>> netfront fix should be committed as it will be required for qemu-stubdom
>> to work.
>> ---
>>   Config.mk | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Config.mk b/Config.mk
>> index 4d723eec1d..d4e8ced104 100644
>> --- a/Config.mk
>> +++ b/Config.mk
>> @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ MINIOS_UPSTREAM_URL ?= git://xenbits.xen.org/mini-os.git
>>   endif
>>   OVMF_UPSTREAM_REVISION ?= b37cfdd2807181aed2fee1e17bd7ec1190db266a
>>   QEMU_UPSTREAM_REVISION ?= master
>> -MINIOS_UPSTREAM_REVISION ?= 051b87bb9c19609976fb038f386920e1ce5454c5
>> +MINIOS_UPSTREAM_REVISION ?= master
> 
> I'm afraid this, effectively reverting 82c3d15c903a ("minios: Revert recent
> change and revert to working minios"), would set us up for the same problem
> again that was dealt with there. IOW you're re-proposing a change of yours
> (e013e8514389 ["config: use mini-os master for unstable"]) which was
> subsequently reverted, without spelling out what has since changed.

How do you suggest to proceed then?

Will every Mini-OS commit require to be followed by a Xen commit then,
which will either result in a test success, or in a revert of that Xen
commit?

It should be noted that the presumed interface change in Mini-OS causing
the failure in OSStest last year has been reverted by me.


Juergen

[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 3135 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 495 bytes --]