All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: peterz@infradead.org, "mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>,
	syzbot <syzbot+53383ae265fb161ef488@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux@dominikbrodowski.net, mhocko@suse.com, rientjes@google.com,
	syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
	boqun.feng@gmail.com
Subject: Re: WARNING: locking bug in lock_downgrade
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 23:18:44 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d61e0a3e-a71e-9e42-7a56-d6fcfc0f6b63@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69273d51-c129-6b0f-35eb-d98655476ff9@redhat.com>

On 2018/12/14 4:46, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 12/12/2018 08:14 PM, Yang Shi wrote:
>> By looking into lockdep code, I'm not sure if lockdep may get confused
>> by such sequence or not?
>>
>>
>> Any hint is appreciated.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Yang 
> 
> The warning was printed because hlock->read was set when doing the
> downgrade_write(). So it is either downgrade_write() was called a second
> time or a read lock was held originally. It is hard to tell what is the
> root cause without a reproducer.
> 
> Cheers,
> Longman
> 

Comparing with output from

        struct rw_semaphore *sem = &current->mm->mmap_sem;

        down_write(sem);
        pr_warn("mmap_sem: count=%ld current=%px, owner=%px\n", atomic_long_read(&sem->count), current, READ_ONCE(sem->owner));
        /* mmap_sem: count=-4294967295 current=ffff88813095ca80, owner=ffff88813095ca80 */
        downgrade_write(sem);
        pr_warn("mmap_sem: count=%ld current=%px, owner=%px\n", atomic_long_read(&sem->count), current, READ_ONCE(sem->owner));
        /* mmap_sem: count=1 current=ffff88813095ca80, owner=ffff88813095ca83 */
        up_read(sem);
        pr_warn("mmap_sem: count=%ld current=%px, owner=%px\n", atomic_long_read(&sem->count), current, READ_ONCE(sem->owner));
        /* mmap_sem: count=0 current=ffff88813095ca80, owner=0000000000000003 */

what we got with debug printk() patch

  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/text?tag=CrashLog&x=169dbb9b400000

  [ 2580.337550][ T3645] mmap_sem: hlock->read=1 count=-4294967295 current=ffff888050e04140, owner=ffff888050e04140
  [ 2580.353526][ T3645] ------------[ cut here ]------------
  [ 2580.367859][ T3645] downgrading a read lock
  [ 2580.367935][ T3645] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3645 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3572 lock_downgrade+0x35d/0xbe0
  [ 2580.382206][ T3645] Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ...

  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/text?tag=CrashLog&x=1542da4f400000

  [  386.342585][T16698] mmap_sem: hlock->read=1 count=-4294967295 current=ffff8880512ae180, owner=ffff8880512ae180
  [  386.348586][T16698] ------------[ cut here ]------------
  [  386.357203][T16698] downgrading a read lock
  [  386.357294][T16698] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 16698 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3572 lock_downgrade+0x35d/0xbe0
  [  386.372148][T16698] Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ...

indicates that lockdep is saying that "current->mm->mmap_sem is held for read"
while "struct rw_semaphore" is saying that "current->mm->mmap_sem is held for write".
Something made lockdep confused. Possibly a lockdep bug.


  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-09 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-26 20:38 WARNING: locking bug in lock_downgrade syzbot
2018-12-13  1:14 ` Yang Shi
2018-12-13 19:46   ` Waiman Long
2019-01-09 14:18     ` Tetsuo Handa [this message]
2019-01-09 22:46       ` Waiman Long
2019-01-10  2:45         ` Tetsuo Handa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d61e0a3e-a71e-9e42-7a56-d6fcfc0f6b63@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --to=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=syzbot+53383ae265fb161ef488@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.