Hi Axobe, On Fri, 2021-09-03 at 09:00 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 9/3/21 8:38 AM, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > > On Fri, 2021-09-03 at 08:15 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > On 9/3/21 8:13 AM, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > > > > Hi Axboe, > > > > > > > > Thanks for reporting. > > > > On Fri, 2021-09-03 at 07:36 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > Booting Linus's tree causes a crash on my laptop, an x1 gen9. > > > > > This > > > > > was > > > > > a bit > > > > > difficult to pin down as it crashes before the display is up, > > > > > but I > > > > > managed > > > > > to narrow it down to: > > > > > > > > > > commit d0e936adbd2250cb03f2e840c6651d18edc22ace > > > > > Author: Srinivas Pandruvada < > > > > > srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> > > > > > Date:   Thu Aug 19 19:40:06 2021 -0700 > > > > > > > > > >     cpufreq: intel_pstate: Process HWP Guaranteed change > > > > > notification > > > > > > > > > > which crashes with a NULL pointer deref in > > > > > notify_hwp_interrupt() - > > > > > > > > > > > queue_delayed_work_on(). > > > > > > > > > > Reverting this change makes the laptop boot fine again. > > > > > > > > > Does this change fixes your issue? > > > > > > I would assume so, as it's crashing on cpudata == NULL :-) > > > > > > But why is it NULL? Happy to test patches, but the below doesn't > > > look > > > like > > > a real fix and more of a work-around. > > Please try the attached. Thanks, Srinivas > > This platform is sending an HWP interrupt on a CPU which we didn't > > yet > > bring it up for pstate control. So somehow firmware decided to send > > very early during boot, which previously we would have ignored it > > > > Actually try this, with more prevention > > I can give this a whirl. > > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > > b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > > index b4ffe6c8a0d0..6ee88d7640ea 100644 > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > > @@ -1645,12 +1645,24 @@ void notify_hwp_interrupt(void) > >         if (!hwp_active || !boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP_NOTIFY)) > >                 return; > >   > > -       rdmsrl(MSR_HWP_STATUS, value); > > +       rdmsrl_safe(MSR_HWP_STATUS, &value); > >         if (!(value & 0x01)) > >                 return; > >   > > +       /* > > +        * After hwp_active is set and all_cpu_data is allocated, > > there > > +        * is small window. > > +        */ > > +       if (!all_cpu_data) { > > +               wrmsrl_safe(MSR_HWP_STATUS, 0); > > +               return; > > +       } > > What synchronizes the all_cpu_data setup and the interrupt? Can the > interrupt come in while it's still being setup? >