From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Srinivas Kandagatla Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [Patch v6 1/7] slimbus: Device management on SLIMbus Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:23:13 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20171006155136.4682-1-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> <20171006155136.4682-2-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> <20171010104509.GC30097@localhost> <20171010164930.GD30097@localhost> <9e2bb2fa-b391-055e-407e-c93f43428840@linaro.org> <20171011040741.GE30097@localhost> <20171011102132.GG30097@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:44975 "EHLO mail-wm0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751983AbdJKLXQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2017 07:23:16 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id 196so19309689wma.1 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 04:23:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20171011102132.GG30097@localhost> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Vinod Koul Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, broonie@kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com, poeschel@lemonage.de, andreas.noever@gmail.com, gong.chen@linux.intel.com, arnd@arndb.de, kheitke@audience.com, bp@suse.de, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, james.hogan@imgtec.com, pawel.moll@arm.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, sharon.dvir1@mail.huji.ac.il, robh+dt@kernel.org, sdharia@codeaurora.org, alan@linux.intel.com, treding@nvidia.com, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, jkosina@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, daniel@ffwll.ch, joe@perches.com, davem@davemloft.net On 11/10/17 11:21, Vinod Koul wrote: >>> ah which cases would those be. I was expecting that you would have a >>> platform_device as a slimbus controller which would call slim_register? >> As of now there is only one controller which uses platform driver, but in >> future there might be more, but this is something which makes the slimbus >> core more flexible. > even if you have more controllers wouldn't we have similar number of platform > devices. Each instance of the link/controller would have its device node. > Yep, I will give at try and see in next version! thanks, srini > Thanks > -- ~Vinod