All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
	Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@intel.com>,
	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@intel.com>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	"alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-modules@vger.kernel.org" <linux-modules@vger.kernel.org>,
	"mauro.chehab@linux.intel.com" <mauro.chehab@linux.intel.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] module: update dependencies at try_module_get()
Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 06:08:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d728cc1b-d34f-77a5-a1fb-81cc117a3620@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ad2a9fe66cf502e2e2e2325f1f04d0fae36aa82b.1651348913.git.mchehab@kernel.org>



Le 30/04/2022 à 22:04, Mauro Carvalho Chehab a écrit :
> Sometimes, device drivers are bound into each other via try_module_get(),
> making such references invisible when looking at /proc/modules or lsmod.
> 
> Add a function to allow setting up module references for such
> cases, and call it when try_module_get() is used.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
> ---
> 
> See [PATCH v5 0/2] at: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1651348913.git.mchehab@kernel.org/
> 
>   include/linux/module.h |  8 ++++--
>   kernel/module/main.c   | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>   2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h
> index 46d4d5f2516e..3d9d38c426b4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/module.h
> +++ b/include/linux/module.h
> @@ -620,12 +620,12 @@ extern void __module_get(struct module *module);
>   
>   /* This is the Right Way to get a module: if it fails, it's being removed,
>    * so pretend it's not there. */
> -extern bool try_module_get(struct module *module);
> +extern bool try_module_get_owner(struct module *module, struct module *this);

You may want to remove that useless 'extern'.

'checkpatch --strict' will likely tell you to do so.

>   
>   extern void module_put(struct module *module);
>   
>   #else /*!CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD*/
> -static inline bool try_module_get(struct module *module)
> +static inline bool try_module_get_owner(struct module *module, struct module *this)
>   {
>   	return !module || module_is_live(module);
>   }
> @@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ static inline void __module_get(struct module *module)
>   {
>   }
>   
> -static inline bool try_module_get(struct module *module)
> +static inline bool try_module_get_owner(struct module *module, struct module *this)
>   {
>   	return true;
>   }
> @@ -875,6 +875,8 @@ static inline bool module_sig_ok(struct module *module)
>   }
>   #endif	/* CONFIG_MODULE_SIG */
>   
> +#define try_module_get(mod) try_module_get_owner(mod, THIS_MODULE)
> +
>   int module_kallsyms_on_each_symbol(int (*fn)(void *, const char *,
>   					     struct module *, unsigned long),
>   				   void *data);
> diff --git a/kernel/module/main.c b/kernel/module/main.c
> index 05a42d8fcd7a..218c4308bb7a 100644
> --- a/kernel/module/main.c
> +++ b/kernel/module/main.c
> @@ -150,6 +150,24 @@ int unregister_module_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_module_notifier);
>   
> +static bool __try_module_get(struct module *module)
> +{
> +	bool ret = true;
> +
> +	if (module) {
> +		preempt_disable();
> +		/* Note: here, we can fail to get a reference */
> +		if (likely(module_is_live(module) &&
> +			   atomic_inc_not_zero(&module->refcnt) != 0))
> +			trace_module_get(module, _RET_IP_);
> +		else
> +			ret = false;
> +
> +		preempt_enable();
> +	}
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>   /*
>    * We require a truly strong try_module_get(): 0 means success.
>    * Otherwise an error is returned due to ongoing or failed
> @@ -160,7 +178,7 @@ static inline int strong_try_module_get(struct module *mod)
>   	BUG_ON(mod && mod->state == MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED);
>   	if (mod && mod->state == MODULE_STATE_COMING)
>   		return -EBUSY;
> -	if (try_module_get(mod))
> +	if (__try_module_get(mod))
>   		return 0;
>   	else
>   		return -ENOENT;
> @@ -631,6 +649,33 @@ static int ref_module(struct module *a, struct module *b)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +static int ref_module_dependency(struct module *mod, struct module *this)

What is 'this' ? Can we give it a more precise name ? Is it a child, a 
parent, a owner, something else ?

> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!this || !this->name)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (mod == this)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
> +
> +	ret = ref_module(this, mod);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD

Looks like that #ifdef could be avoided and replaced by 
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD)

Something like:

	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD) || ret)
		goto ret;


> +	if (ret)
> +		goto ret;
> +
> +	ret = sysfs_create_link(mod->holders_dir,
> +				&this->mkobj.kobj, this->name);
> +#endif
> +
> +ret:
> +	mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>   /* Clear the unload stuff of the module. */
>   static void module_unload_free(struct module *mod)
>   {
> @@ -841,24 +886,16 @@ void __module_get(struct module *module)
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(__module_get);
>   
> -bool try_module_get(struct module *module)
> +bool try_module_get_owner(struct module *module, struct module *this)

Same here, what is 'this' exactly ?

>   {
> -	bool ret = true;
> +	int ret = __try_module_get(module);
>   
> -	if (module) {
> -		preempt_disable();
> -		/* Note: here, we can fail to get a reference */
> -		if (likely(module_is_live(module) &&
> -			   atomic_inc_not_zero(&module->refcnt) != 0))
> -			trace_module_get(module, _RET_IP_);
> -		else
> -			ret = false;
> +	if (ret)
> +		ref_module_dependency(module, this);
>   
> -		preempt_enable();
> -	}
>   	return ret;
>   }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(try_module_get);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(try_module_get_owner);
>   
>   void module_put(struct module *module)
>   {

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	"mauro.chehab@linux.intel.com" <mauro.chehab@linux.intel.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
	Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@intel.com>,
	"linux-modules@vger.kernel.org" <linux-modules@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] module: update dependencies at try_module_get()
Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 06:08:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d728cc1b-d34f-77a5-a1fb-81cc117a3620@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ad2a9fe66cf502e2e2e2325f1f04d0fae36aa82b.1651348913.git.mchehab@kernel.org>



Le 30/04/2022 à 22:04, Mauro Carvalho Chehab a écrit :
> Sometimes, device drivers are bound into each other via try_module_get(),
> making such references invisible when looking at /proc/modules or lsmod.
> 
> Add a function to allow setting up module references for such
> cases, and call it when try_module_get() is used.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
> ---
> 
> See [PATCH v5 0/2] at: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1651348913.git.mchehab@kernel.org/
> 
>   include/linux/module.h |  8 ++++--
>   kernel/module/main.c   | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>   2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h
> index 46d4d5f2516e..3d9d38c426b4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/module.h
> +++ b/include/linux/module.h
> @@ -620,12 +620,12 @@ extern void __module_get(struct module *module);
>   
>   /* This is the Right Way to get a module: if it fails, it's being removed,
>    * so pretend it's not there. */
> -extern bool try_module_get(struct module *module);
> +extern bool try_module_get_owner(struct module *module, struct module *this);

You may want to remove that useless 'extern'.

'checkpatch --strict' will likely tell you to do so.

>   
>   extern void module_put(struct module *module);
>   
>   #else /*!CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD*/
> -static inline bool try_module_get(struct module *module)
> +static inline bool try_module_get_owner(struct module *module, struct module *this)
>   {
>   	return !module || module_is_live(module);
>   }
> @@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ static inline void __module_get(struct module *module)
>   {
>   }
>   
> -static inline bool try_module_get(struct module *module)
> +static inline bool try_module_get_owner(struct module *module, struct module *this)
>   {
>   	return true;
>   }
> @@ -875,6 +875,8 @@ static inline bool module_sig_ok(struct module *module)
>   }
>   #endif	/* CONFIG_MODULE_SIG */
>   
> +#define try_module_get(mod) try_module_get_owner(mod, THIS_MODULE)
> +
>   int module_kallsyms_on_each_symbol(int (*fn)(void *, const char *,
>   					     struct module *, unsigned long),
>   				   void *data);
> diff --git a/kernel/module/main.c b/kernel/module/main.c
> index 05a42d8fcd7a..218c4308bb7a 100644
> --- a/kernel/module/main.c
> +++ b/kernel/module/main.c
> @@ -150,6 +150,24 @@ int unregister_module_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_module_notifier);
>   
> +static bool __try_module_get(struct module *module)
> +{
> +	bool ret = true;
> +
> +	if (module) {
> +		preempt_disable();
> +		/* Note: here, we can fail to get a reference */
> +		if (likely(module_is_live(module) &&
> +			   atomic_inc_not_zero(&module->refcnt) != 0))
> +			trace_module_get(module, _RET_IP_);
> +		else
> +			ret = false;
> +
> +		preempt_enable();
> +	}
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>   /*
>    * We require a truly strong try_module_get(): 0 means success.
>    * Otherwise an error is returned due to ongoing or failed
> @@ -160,7 +178,7 @@ static inline int strong_try_module_get(struct module *mod)
>   	BUG_ON(mod && mod->state == MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED);
>   	if (mod && mod->state == MODULE_STATE_COMING)
>   		return -EBUSY;
> -	if (try_module_get(mod))
> +	if (__try_module_get(mod))
>   		return 0;
>   	else
>   		return -ENOENT;
> @@ -631,6 +649,33 @@ static int ref_module(struct module *a, struct module *b)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +static int ref_module_dependency(struct module *mod, struct module *this)

What is 'this' ? Can we give it a more precise name ? Is it a child, a 
parent, a owner, something else ?

> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!this || !this->name)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (mod == this)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
> +
> +	ret = ref_module(this, mod);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD

Looks like that #ifdef could be avoided and replaced by 
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD)

Something like:

	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD) || ret)
		goto ret;


> +	if (ret)
> +		goto ret;
> +
> +	ret = sysfs_create_link(mod->holders_dir,
> +				&this->mkobj.kobj, this->name);
> +#endif
> +
> +ret:
> +	mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>   /* Clear the unload stuff of the module. */
>   static void module_unload_free(struct module *mod)
>   {
> @@ -841,24 +886,16 @@ void __module_get(struct module *module)
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(__module_get);
>   
> -bool try_module_get(struct module *module)
> +bool try_module_get_owner(struct module *module, struct module *this)

Same here, what is 'this' exactly ?

>   {
> -	bool ret = true;
> +	int ret = __try_module_get(module);
>   
> -	if (module) {
> -		preempt_disable();
> -		/* Note: here, we can fail to get a reference */
> -		if (likely(module_is_live(module) &&
> -			   atomic_inc_not_zero(&module->refcnt) != 0))
> -			trace_module_get(module, _RET_IP_);
> -		else
> -			ret = false;
> +	if (ret)
> +		ref_module_dependency(module, this);
>   
> -		preempt_enable();
> -	}
>   	return ret;
>   }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(try_module_get);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(try_module_get_owner);
>   
>   void module_put(struct module *module)
>   {

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	"mauro.chehab@linux.intel.com" <mauro.chehab@linux.intel.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@intel.com>,
	"linux-modules@vger.kernel.org" <linux-modules@vger.kernel.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] module: update dependencies at try_module_get()
Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 06:08:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d728cc1b-d34f-77a5-a1fb-81cc117a3620@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ad2a9fe66cf502e2e2e2325f1f04d0fae36aa82b.1651348913.git.mchehab@kernel.org>



Le 30/04/2022 à 22:04, Mauro Carvalho Chehab a écrit :
> Sometimes, device drivers are bound into each other via try_module_get(),
> making such references invisible when looking at /proc/modules or lsmod.
> 
> Add a function to allow setting up module references for such
> cases, and call it when try_module_get() is used.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
> ---
> 
> See [PATCH v5 0/2] at: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1651348913.git.mchehab@kernel.org/
> 
>   include/linux/module.h |  8 ++++--
>   kernel/module/main.c   | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>   2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h
> index 46d4d5f2516e..3d9d38c426b4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/module.h
> +++ b/include/linux/module.h
> @@ -620,12 +620,12 @@ extern void __module_get(struct module *module);
>   
>   /* This is the Right Way to get a module: if it fails, it's being removed,
>    * so pretend it's not there. */
> -extern bool try_module_get(struct module *module);
> +extern bool try_module_get_owner(struct module *module, struct module *this);

You may want to remove that useless 'extern'.

'checkpatch --strict' will likely tell you to do so.

>   
>   extern void module_put(struct module *module);
>   
>   #else /*!CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD*/
> -static inline bool try_module_get(struct module *module)
> +static inline bool try_module_get_owner(struct module *module, struct module *this)
>   {
>   	return !module || module_is_live(module);
>   }
> @@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ static inline void __module_get(struct module *module)
>   {
>   }
>   
> -static inline bool try_module_get(struct module *module)
> +static inline bool try_module_get_owner(struct module *module, struct module *this)
>   {
>   	return true;
>   }
> @@ -875,6 +875,8 @@ static inline bool module_sig_ok(struct module *module)
>   }
>   #endif	/* CONFIG_MODULE_SIG */
>   
> +#define try_module_get(mod) try_module_get_owner(mod, THIS_MODULE)
> +
>   int module_kallsyms_on_each_symbol(int (*fn)(void *, const char *,
>   					     struct module *, unsigned long),
>   				   void *data);
> diff --git a/kernel/module/main.c b/kernel/module/main.c
> index 05a42d8fcd7a..218c4308bb7a 100644
> --- a/kernel/module/main.c
> +++ b/kernel/module/main.c
> @@ -150,6 +150,24 @@ int unregister_module_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_module_notifier);
>   
> +static bool __try_module_get(struct module *module)
> +{
> +	bool ret = true;
> +
> +	if (module) {
> +		preempt_disable();
> +		/* Note: here, we can fail to get a reference */
> +		if (likely(module_is_live(module) &&
> +			   atomic_inc_not_zero(&module->refcnt) != 0))
> +			trace_module_get(module, _RET_IP_);
> +		else
> +			ret = false;
> +
> +		preempt_enable();
> +	}
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>   /*
>    * We require a truly strong try_module_get(): 0 means success.
>    * Otherwise an error is returned due to ongoing or failed
> @@ -160,7 +178,7 @@ static inline int strong_try_module_get(struct module *mod)
>   	BUG_ON(mod && mod->state == MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED);
>   	if (mod && mod->state == MODULE_STATE_COMING)
>   		return -EBUSY;
> -	if (try_module_get(mod))
> +	if (__try_module_get(mod))
>   		return 0;
>   	else
>   		return -ENOENT;
> @@ -631,6 +649,33 @@ static int ref_module(struct module *a, struct module *b)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +static int ref_module_dependency(struct module *mod, struct module *this)

What is 'this' ? Can we give it a more precise name ? Is it a child, a 
parent, a owner, something else ?

> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!this || !this->name)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (mod == this)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
> +
> +	ret = ref_module(this, mod);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD

Looks like that #ifdef could be avoided and replaced by 
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD)

Something like:

	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD) || ret)
		goto ret;


> +	if (ret)
> +		goto ret;
> +
> +	ret = sysfs_create_link(mod->holders_dir,
> +				&this->mkobj.kobj, this->name);
> +#endif
> +
> +ret:
> +	mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>   /* Clear the unload stuff of the module. */
>   static void module_unload_free(struct module *mod)
>   {
> @@ -841,24 +886,16 @@ void __module_get(struct module *module)
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(__module_get);
>   
> -bool try_module_get(struct module *module)
> +bool try_module_get_owner(struct module *module, struct module *this)

Same here, what is 'this' exactly ?

>   {
> -	bool ret = true;
> +	int ret = __try_module_get(module);
>   
> -	if (module) {
> -		preempt_disable();
> -		/* Note: here, we can fail to get a reference */
> -		if (likely(module_is_live(module) &&
> -			   atomic_inc_not_zero(&module->refcnt) != 0))
> -			trace_module_get(module, _RET_IP_);
> -		else
> -			ret = false;
> +	if (ret)
> +		ref_module_dependency(module, this);
>   
> -		preempt_enable();
> -	}
>   	return ret;
>   }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(try_module_get);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(try_module_get_owner);
>   
>   void module_put(struct module *module)
>   {

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	"mauro.chehab@linux.intel.com" <mauro.chehab@linux.intel.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
	Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@intel.com>,
	"linux-modules@vger.kernel.org" <linux-modules@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 1/2] module: update dependencies at try_module_get()
Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 06:08:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d728cc1b-d34f-77a5-a1fb-81cc117a3620@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ad2a9fe66cf502e2e2e2325f1f04d0fae36aa82b.1651348913.git.mchehab@kernel.org>



Le 30/04/2022 à 22:04, Mauro Carvalho Chehab a écrit :
> Sometimes, device drivers are bound into each other via try_module_get(),
> making such references invisible when looking at /proc/modules or lsmod.
> 
> Add a function to allow setting up module references for such
> cases, and call it when try_module_get() is used.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
> ---
> 
> See [PATCH v5 0/2] at: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1651348913.git.mchehab@kernel.org/
> 
>   include/linux/module.h |  8 ++++--
>   kernel/module/main.c   | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>   2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h
> index 46d4d5f2516e..3d9d38c426b4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/module.h
> +++ b/include/linux/module.h
> @@ -620,12 +620,12 @@ extern void __module_get(struct module *module);
>   
>   /* This is the Right Way to get a module: if it fails, it's being removed,
>    * so pretend it's not there. */
> -extern bool try_module_get(struct module *module);
> +extern bool try_module_get_owner(struct module *module, struct module *this);

You may want to remove that useless 'extern'.

'checkpatch --strict' will likely tell you to do so.

>   
>   extern void module_put(struct module *module);
>   
>   #else /*!CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD*/
> -static inline bool try_module_get(struct module *module)
> +static inline bool try_module_get_owner(struct module *module, struct module *this)
>   {
>   	return !module || module_is_live(module);
>   }
> @@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ static inline void __module_get(struct module *module)
>   {
>   }
>   
> -static inline bool try_module_get(struct module *module)
> +static inline bool try_module_get_owner(struct module *module, struct module *this)
>   {
>   	return true;
>   }
> @@ -875,6 +875,8 @@ static inline bool module_sig_ok(struct module *module)
>   }
>   #endif	/* CONFIG_MODULE_SIG */
>   
> +#define try_module_get(mod) try_module_get_owner(mod, THIS_MODULE)
> +
>   int module_kallsyms_on_each_symbol(int (*fn)(void *, const char *,
>   					     struct module *, unsigned long),
>   				   void *data);
> diff --git a/kernel/module/main.c b/kernel/module/main.c
> index 05a42d8fcd7a..218c4308bb7a 100644
> --- a/kernel/module/main.c
> +++ b/kernel/module/main.c
> @@ -150,6 +150,24 @@ int unregister_module_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_module_notifier);
>   
> +static bool __try_module_get(struct module *module)
> +{
> +	bool ret = true;
> +
> +	if (module) {
> +		preempt_disable();
> +		/* Note: here, we can fail to get a reference */
> +		if (likely(module_is_live(module) &&
> +			   atomic_inc_not_zero(&module->refcnt) != 0))
> +			trace_module_get(module, _RET_IP_);
> +		else
> +			ret = false;
> +
> +		preempt_enable();
> +	}
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>   /*
>    * We require a truly strong try_module_get(): 0 means success.
>    * Otherwise an error is returned due to ongoing or failed
> @@ -160,7 +178,7 @@ static inline int strong_try_module_get(struct module *mod)
>   	BUG_ON(mod && mod->state == MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED);
>   	if (mod && mod->state == MODULE_STATE_COMING)
>   		return -EBUSY;
> -	if (try_module_get(mod))
> +	if (__try_module_get(mod))
>   		return 0;
>   	else
>   		return -ENOENT;
> @@ -631,6 +649,33 @@ static int ref_module(struct module *a, struct module *b)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +static int ref_module_dependency(struct module *mod, struct module *this)

What is 'this' ? Can we give it a more precise name ? Is it a child, a 
parent, a owner, something else ?

> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!this || !this->name)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (mod == this)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
> +
> +	ret = ref_module(this, mod);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD

Looks like that #ifdef could be avoided and replaced by 
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD)

Something like:

	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD) || ret)
		goto ret;


> +	if (ret)
> +		goto ret;
> +
> +	ret = sysfs_create_link(mod->holders_dir,
> +				&this->mkobj.kobj, this->name);
> +#endif
> +
> +ret:
> +	mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>   /* Clear the unload stuff of the module. */
>   static void module_unload_free(struct module *mod)
>   {
> @@ -841,24 +886,16 @@ void __module_get(struct module *module)
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(__module_get);
>   
> -bool try_module_get(struct module *module)
> +bool try_module_get_owner(struct module *module, struct module *this)

Same here, what is 'this' exactly ?

>   {
> -	bool ret = true;
> +	int ret = __try_module_get(module);
>   
> -	if (module) {
> -		preempt_disable();
> -		/* Note: here, we can fail to get a reference */
> -		if (likely(module_is_live(module) &&
> -			   atomic_inc_not_zero(&module->refcnt) != 0))
> -			trace_module_get(module, _RET_IP_);
> -		else
> -			ret = false;
> +	if (ret)
> +		ref_module_dependency(module, this);
>   
> -		preempt_enable();
> -	}
>   	return ret;
>   }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(try_module_get);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(try_module_get_owner);
>   
>   void module_put(struct module *module)
>   {

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-02  6:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-30 20:04 [PATCH v5 0/2] Let userspace know when snd-hda-intel needs i915 Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-04-30 20:04 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-04-30 20:04 ` [Intel-gfx] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-04-30 20:04 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-04-30 20:04 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] module: update dependencies at try_module_get() Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-04-30 20:04   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-04-30 20:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-04-30 20:04   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-05-02  6:08   ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2022-05-02  6:08     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christophe Leroy
2022-05-02  6:08     ` Christophe Leroy
2022-05-02  6:08     ` Christophe Leroy
2022-05-05 21:35   ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2022-05-05 21:35     ` Andi Shyti
2022-05-09 16:56     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-05-09 16:56       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-05-09 16:56       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-04-30 20:04 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] ALSA: hda - identify when audio is provided by a video driver Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-04-30 20:04   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-04-30 20:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-04-30 20:04   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-05-09  8:48   ` Takashi Iwai
2022-05-09  8:48     ` Takashi Iwai
2022-05-09  8:48     ` Takashi Iwai
2022-05-09  8:48     ` [Intel-gfx] " Takashi Iwai
2022-04-30 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Let userspace know when snd-hda-intel needs i915 Patchwork
2022-04-30 20:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-04-30 22:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d728cc1b-d34f-77a5-a1fb-81cc117a3620@csgroup.eu \
    --to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kai.vehmanen@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=mauro.chehab@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=perex@perex.cz \
    --cc=pierre-louis.bossart@intel.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] module: update dependencies at try_module_get()' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.