From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B114C433FE for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 13:27:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1576878AbiAYN0i (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jan 2022 08:26:38 -0500 Received: from smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com ([185.125.188.123]:44312 "EHLO smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1576441AbiAYNV5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jan 2022 08:21:57 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f72.google.com (mail-wr1-f72.google.com [209.85.221.72]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 497463F1CC for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 13:21:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canonical.com; s=20210705; t=1643116916; bh=GqSRGOwqotf00GRrIVq/CrHZH/1UrUmdSDaTt40VOAM=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=QkG3WCgxRohfH2+6GrIzN637gMpOwBy5Oi+SmHciXZCrqyqUr1E8vjZ8mgdvMcQ7R SzvbEUvQmU20idZp6kFulGfs3WAK79MlJiVrnmplKE5vbBoMuNBawuq/mmko3dFXPp 91sllNx+Pnzo6uELhlNJbxMwvKrys6gsrTsMjtppaRPvYqtNISat1T5UarrA4HK5yT RAF9qS9huANGJPB5ki7YvCjd3eXZN+AG0b3JdYJ8pbvKXYtGpkwvnayCVtTy4jG2Jm Y1VQ2dNkcV71gtqTwbx8twM4r0qezjG4BvH+wc3W6eTJKFVsqmHasmWetCADPWkX8M 4B3i5/9W1gH/w== Received: by mail-wr1-f72.google.com with SMTP id x4-20020adfbb44000000b001d83e815683so3035805wrg.8 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 05:21:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=GqSRGOwqotf00GRrIVq/CrHZH/1UrUmdSDaTt40VOAM=; b=YIJthmRmuLxVAy8411aGdDFfavvBnwbJ4LpFCCagch+rcrbR4mIaLc+eiriNndhOm5 2qhPdkiI4lSYYRJRkFQot5PmUCqLh1d13SA50+8zV0axaU3Ct33Z3gxelVu81Ekf0rgA frGmv9AFlU4CmcITx2tCpc9ievntNTyusn3fH7vVFPVbLhaflohivxZpf6MgkNyeJgaM 5/0ZsbUptradyiN7xpaishYoJcs3c2ealVyv8Q2ImHQpSLRqtO8YWY81HUVJztLzhn4p fVJCeTrO+y4fdSMfFQGQU0JUWAgaViRAdnxKG+ubT8qCBSB4tKkEFr2+85Dmmqc2SKK9 zkXg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533z8Ii/8juUAVkTxLgwS4t1n/E5jHpCRZvx8phcHN7AvUGKTPWn 0ibA0vmRtbM4K/aX0zgdPap9b3GZ6+o7c/anvCBjmR1qrtBsFg0f/Kc8RFsGsRe6RLOfhwfNMDr vBv+h21NhLPDVv4orYpt7fbqTiFASnnFv3frWzxA1Hw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f14a:: with SMTP id y10mr17659172wro.145.1643116915696; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 05:21:55 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxQEDd2I8GeJEKiaLo3Ns9QBAcA+Cpew7nwWs/FsWRHpr/3jD2rwboT4OiDAN2ucloeNLoOOg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f14a:: with SMTP id y10mr17659159wro.145.1643116915523; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 05:21:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.59] (xdsl-188-155-168-84.adslplus.ch. [188.155.168.84]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t1sm3607494wre.45.2022.01.25.05.21.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Jan 2022 05:21:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 14:21:54 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arm64: dts: samsung: Second pull for v5.17 Content-Language: en-US To: Sam Protsenko Cc: Olof Johansson , Arnd Bergmann , arm-soc , SoC Team , Linux ARM , "moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Krzysztof Kozlowski References: <20211227112959.7325-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> <72a50afd-df9f-ceb3-898e-070d70dc0221@canonical.com> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 24/01/2022 14:50, Sam Protsenko wrote: > On Sun, 23 Jan 2022 at 21:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski > wrote: >> >> On 22/01/2022 13:38, Sam Protsenko wrote: >>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 at 18:53, Olof Johansson wrote: >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 8:07 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 4:11 PM Sam Protsenko >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 at 13:30, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Olof, Arnd, >>>>>> >>>>>> Just want to check if it's possible for those patches to be applied in >>>>>> v5.17? Sorry for the noise, but that's important to me. >>>>> >>>>> I can see that Olof merged merged this into the "arm/late" branch in >>>>> the soc tree, >>>>> so I assume he still plans to send it in the next few days. >>>> >>>> Yep, will be sent up today most likely. >>>> >>> >>> Thanks for detailed answer! Glad to hear it's still a possibility. >>> Please let me know if you need any actions on my side (like rebasing, >>> etc). >>> >>>>> With the timing over Christmas, I sent out the large bulk of the >>>>> contents (anything >>>>> I merged before Dec 23) last year, and Linus already merged it, the rest ended >>>>> up in the "late" branch. >>>>> >>>>> As usual, there is no guarantee that late changes make it in, but I have seen >>>>> no indication of any problems so far. >>>> >>>> Correct. Been sitting on it for a while in case there were fixes >>>> coming in for the first pieces that got merged, but in traditional >>>> fashion I'm guessing those will start to show up a few days after the >>>> late branch gets merged. :) >> >> Olof, >> v5.17-rc1 came earlier, so I see this part did not make into it. Is >> there a chance for a past-rc1 pull to Linus with it? >> >> Sam, >> Anyway the patches wont' get lost (you mentioned such worry in previous >> email to me). They might just need to wait. Unfortunately if patch, >> especially with new feature, is coming in the end of cycle, there is a >> risk it won't make it. The patches have to wait a few days in my trees >> before I send them to Arnd/Olof, so if the patch is coming after rc6, I >> can push it to Arnd/Olof around rc7, you see there is very little time. >> > > Should I send the patch fixing hard-coded clock numbers though? I > remember you said I should send it once -rc1 is out. But now that dts > patches are not merged in mainline, I'm not sure it can still be > applied? Yeah, please wait. We have few patches following that pull-request, so it will be actually easier not to merge it to soc-tree but resend soon with the follow-ups. Best regards, Krzysztof From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55751C433F5 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 13:23:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To: Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=bJAEVo15VEyS9Pqhocg4tK7t/Ansys4vfixFMthkSNw=; b=TtuP668sGG6bAK QbwqeGic2qoHG0P8ngPVgsmDLhPSbgrVuhuQQxveLDo318cbuU2Tolqo7Bb4hS0GQi1tCSJIMjgj0 vWGqHzOJMpiegysOKMuiAhuU0BhweNn2B/ATbZTByfX8b2SpIptAD5NKCAVlpRMv3M+retocCxbWB rqURlqJRdvGv9AQc0XtVYBr1QGBgI7iw4oa3AJj+AbubS3WwYkmHCVyzPZbH75jEa+ITZbnnFEgTz phpytUXPN0c6HUspU/vD883a+rxk+9yCa0x3fbNroq6M/2l7mU3voBkDx4UBGV8CWqxNpWSp5jj6K H7MD7ZCnHYiOr39twPsg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nCLlw-007twb-Ii; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 13:22:08 +0000 Received: from smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com ([185.125.188.123]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nCLlm-007ttF-Ok for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 13:22:00 +0000 Received: from mail-wr1-f71.google.com (mail-wr1-f71.google.com [209.85.221.71]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40B023F1CB for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 13:21:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canonical.com; s=20210705; t=1643116916; bh=GqSRGOwqotf00GRrIVq/CrHZH/1UrUmdSDaTt40VOAM=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=QkG3WCgxRohfH2+6GrIzN637gMpOwBy5Oi+SmHciXZCrqyqUr1E8vjZ8mgdvMcQ7R SzvbEUvQmU20idZp6kFulGfs3WAK79MlJiVrnmplKE5vbBoMuNBawuq/mmko3dFXPp 91sllNx+Pnzo6uELhlNJbxMwvKrys6gsrTsMjtppaRPvYqtNISat1T5UarrA4HK5yT RAF9qS9huANGJPB5ki7YvCjd3eXZN+AG0b3JdYJ8pbvKXYtGpkwvnayCVtTy4jG2Jm Y1VQ2dNkcV71gtqTwbx8twM4r0qezjG4BvH+wc3W6eTJKFVsqmHasmWetCADPWkX8M 4B3i5/9W1gH/w== Received: by mail-wr1-f71.google.com with SMTP id a11-20020adffb8b000000b001a0b0f4afe9so3045518wrr.13 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 05:21:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=GqSRGOwqotf00GRrIVq/CrHZH/1UrUmdSDaTt40VOAM=; b=q/WH0fJCZC34HZswA9hX4ZudMmcMGn70N/IShK8B4HBcE6TP3Vrapj8mTwpU8mz9Kg d1S40qurBZZoKetOZ46NfVdo1ev28DVcA7jJ6oC5mcOfS8KEJHEFpvHvHzC2WwBeJwfW oJV/kE+c2SZgAfHnwkdzwuBOJrRrbYQbOlfaIs+UIqvruPSoZ98o7kx9SgyBTIaAlNw7 4ucj/fKB81Aob3PYc2qjdsstY9L3WjoQ2ACF6gUBlREKwlTc9UEXx7Bz0U730l96P4cG h+dg6VDX4mFpEpHCaCKOGU9NLnlmOTb7pX1TeTfsO6OEHjzCsfetxB/arMJcepcPGhoJ kMVQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533jmOeWZoMh3BlinyA4xcgPCnP6pu4Co/180qmpAzhhB5bYXDXp JmH6jspPbsTu4YFd2lwfWXZpxKTjH6AiHn/H69O0d8Q7mVmFTGbWKy0M4SK5XCiP2jV6AUtGH9c mV04xkv6oXtYCjwXhieNQK4XRARxo86QorTMfe+QtuQ5q1hW4uvNX X-Received: by 2002:adf:f14a:: with SMTP id y10mr17659169wro.145.1643116915691; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 05:21:55 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxQEDd2I8GeJEKiaLo3Ns9QBAcA+Cpew7nwWs/FsWRHpr/3jD2rwboT4OiDAN2ucloeNLoOOg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f14a:: with SMTP id y10mr17659159wro.145.1643116915523; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 05:21:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.59] (xdsl-188-155-168-84.adslplus.ch. [188.155.168.84]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t1sm3607494wre.45.2022.01.25.05.21.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Jan 2022 05:21:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 14:21:54 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arm64: dts: samsung: Second pull for v5.17 Content-Language: en-US To: Sam Protsenko Cc: Olof Johansson , Arnd Bergmann , arm-soc , SoC Team , Linux ARM , "moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Krzysztof Kozlowski References: <20211227112959.7325-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> <72a50afd-df9f-ceb3-898e-070d70dc0221@canonical.com> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220125_052158_980987_B5B4B413 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 28.50 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 24/01/2022 14:50, Sam Protsenko wrote: > On Sun, 23 Jan 2022 at 21:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski > wrote: >> >> On 22/01/2022 13:38, Sam Protsenko wrote: >>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 at 18:53, Olof Johansson wrote: >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 8:07 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 4:11 PM Sam Protsenko >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 at 13:30, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Olof, Arnd, >>>>>> >>>>>> Just want to check if it's possible for those patches to be applied in >>>>>> v5.17? Sorry for the noise, but that's important to me. >>>>> >>>>> I can see that Olof merged merged this into the "arm/late" branch in >>>>> the soc tree, >>>>> so I assume he still plans to send it in the next few days. >>>> >>>> Yep, will be sent up today most likely. >>>> >>> >>> Thanks for detailed answer! Glad to hear it's still a possibility. >>> Please let me know if you need any actions on my side (like rebasing, >>> etc). >>> >>>>> With the timing over Christmas, I sent out the large bulk of the >>>>> contents (anything >>>>> I merged before Dec 23) last year, and Linus already merged it, the rest ended >>>>> up in the "late" branch. >>>>> >>>>> As usual, there is no guarantee that late changes make it in, but I have seen >>>>> no indication of any problems so far. >>>> >>>> Correct. Been sitting on it for a while in case there were fixes >>>> coming in for the first pieces that got merged, but in traditional >>>> fashion I'm guessing those will start to show up a few days after the >>>> late branch gets merged. :) >> >> Olof, >> v5.17-rc1 came earlier, so I see this part did not make into it. Is >> there a chance for a past-rc1 pull to Linus with it? >> >> Sam, >> Anyway the patches wont' get lost (you mentioned such worry in previous >> email to me). They might just need to wait. Unfortunately if patch, >> especially with new feature, is coming in the end of cycle, there is a >> risk it won't make it. The patches have to wait a few days in my trees >> before I send them to Arnd/Olof, so if the patch is coming after rc6, I >> can push it to Arnd/Olof around rc7, you see there is very little time. >> > > Should I send the patch fixing hard-coded clock numbers though? I > remember you said I should send it once -rc1 is out. But now that dts > patches are not merged in mainline, I'm not sure it can still be > applied? Yeah, please wait. We have few patches following that pull-request, so it will be actually easier not to merge it to soc-tree but resend soon with the follow-ups. Best regards, Krzysztof _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel