From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 450C4C43460 for ; Fri, 7 May 2021 13:34:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CFCC6143F for ; Fri, 7 May 2021 13:34:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237266AbhEGNfo (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 May 2021 09:35:44 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44428 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233487AbhEGNfm (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 May 2021 09:35:42 -0400 Received: from mail-oo1-xc32.google.com (mail-oo1-xc32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c32]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA3BDC061574; Fri, 7 May 2021 06:34:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oo1-xc32.google.com with SMTP id u48-20020a4a97330000b02901fa060b8066so1974098ooi.8; Fri, 07 May 2021 06:34:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rSwV1abiHwYQxyZpaOTUg0r4TBMXE5DrMeEgSz835H4=; b=hcGnvHHCVlpUenkLBj4fu/Npe9kGddavG2Zwxuv8oTzVTD/GM/ISnnanC6Z83i1F4X 6EmaFmErpGB0lpXU6rSM+hRi1HHY0ZN0leKX9y657SpfSpnyhh7Sp1i72Nqf68Ej7HVS LlTwGOvByh/K2zQBlJAld11xMFm8TcBHQSbB81Rl/5U4+NAD0iKlMcdcIE/U3FNRLvFq mxUdNWfzeHXh+22/uKT6j3og9rmOWT4JGG1TaYOSbmoIUozRL9zdFeRrPb5g0O0I12VF YySImfDqI5j9QjyKZg6azcrkxJ7S+gHbI55ajEm6a3UIgaNj52nmvEHn5LPqVrRI/rKL k07w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=rSwV1abiHwYQxyZpaOTUg0r4TBMXE5DrMeEgSz835H4=; b=hNWi984exRWBJUIMxjiaKKwx4m3YYGsmZDt5aLHti6oeYZVPR+Tm5lguRffO1m5aXA be+3uZKWtbke7cLzei2mnSX4fk2uIt9yWTcH5nPWVN5eFcCKY0dvjnUd9Hxy+jUNdY3r igre2Z9SccUPye89wHLr2yJYq3hUa39464HhZ8/WH3TOt7nhcTuM5zeXOlfQGM7sGk+k p23AI7ba5sMj9/Sz5fCAJoz39ckQdV/OVFFm2mTrYZfiX5ofH18oE/V1KACDjNl8SZUu TJrBgHzgCSAScWN7KqH7dNIXR6dKblwEVgFlY5dZdzsDUPSgEVwjy90WdyvVMQqTX0sA cTrA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533QqiLRUXgnKCoFcx2lrCpIteJv9SC2WbnMAlmGfIVGAFipg0F+ CedU9e2gETVadNGzUhWwyig= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwiL+MLZwoT8SpWsM8oxXlpGI3tVew0cpbUgI+/btRlyyK1T9V0MQAhWTEWJLH2nylOo3tjcw== X-Received: by 2002:a4a:e965:: with SMTP id i5mr7718698ooe.59.1620394476966; Fri, 07 May 2021 06:34:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server.roeck-us.net ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 2sm695901ota.67.2021.05.07.06.34.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 07 May 2021 06:34:35 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: bme680_i2c: Remove ACPI support To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: Jonathan Cameron , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel test robot , Andy Shevchenko , Hans de Goede References: <20210506034332.752263-1-linux@roeck-us.net> <20210507103154.00006763@Huawei.com> From: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 06:34:33 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210507103154.00006763@Huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 5/7/21 2:31 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Wed, 5 May 2021 20:43:32 -0700 > Guenter Roeck wrote: > >> With CONFIG_ACPI=n and -Werror, 0-day reports: >> >> drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_i2c.c:46:36: error: >> 'bme680_acpi_match' defined but not used >> >> Apparently BME0680 is not a valid ACPI ID. Remove it and with it >> ACPI support from the bme680_i2c driver. >> >> Reported-by: kernel test robot >> Cc: Andy Shevchenko >> Cc: Hans de Goede >> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck > > A note for these is that I'll change the patch titles when applying. > We aren't removing ACPI support from the drivers, we are simply > removing the ACPI ID table entries. For most of these PRP0001 magic > will work just fine with the OF table. That's probably the > right way for small companies etc to use these in products without > having to jump through the hoops of getting an ACPI ID. > Ok, no problem. I'll keep that in mind if I hit any others. Thanks, Guenter