From: Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@puri.sm> To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>, Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>, Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>, martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@puri.sm Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: sd: add runtime pm to open / release Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 17:40:12 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <d9bb92e9-23fa-306f-c7f2-71a81ab28811@puri.sm> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1596034432.4356.19.camel@HansenPartnership.com> On 29.07.20 16:53, James Bottomley wrote: > On Wed, 2020-07-29 at 07:46 -0700, James Bottomley wrote: >> On Wed, 2020-07-29 at 10:32 -0400, Alan Stern wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 04:12:22PM +0200, Martin Kepplinger wrote: >>>> On 28.07.20 22:02, Alan Stern wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 09:02:44AM +0200, Martin Kepplinger >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Hi Alan, >>>>>> >>>>>> Any API cleanup is of course welcome. I just wanted to remind >>>>>> you that the underlying problem: broken block device runtime >>>>>> pm. Your initial proposed fix "almost" did it and mounting >>>>>> works but during file access, it still just looks like a >>>>>> runtime_resume is missing somewhere. >>>>> >>>>> Well, I have tested that proposed fix several times, and on my >>>>> system it's working perfectly. When I stop accessing a drive >>>>> it autosuspends, and when I access it again it gets resumed and >>>>> works -- as you would expect. >>>> >>>> that's weird. when I mount, everything looks good, "sda1". But as >>>> soon as I cd to the mountpoint and do "ls" (on another SD card >>>> "ls" works but actual file reading leads to the exact same >>>> errors), I get: >>>> >>>> [ 77.474632] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#0 UNKNOWN(0x2003) Result: >>>> hostbyte=0x00 driverbyte=0x08 cmd_age=0s >>>> [ 77.474647] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#0 Sense Key : 0x6 [current] >>>> [ 77.474655] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#0 ASC=0x28 ASCQ=0x0 >>>> [ 77.474667] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#0 CDB: opcode=0x28 28 00 00 >>>> 00 60 40 00 00 01 00 >>> >>> This error report comes from the SCSI layer, not the block layer. >> >> That sense code means "NOT READY TO READY CHANGE, MEDIUM MAY HAVE >> CHANGED" so it sounds like it something we should be >> ignoring. Usually this signals a problem, like you changed the >> medium manually (ejected the CD). But in this case you can tell us >> to expect this by setting >> >> sdev->expecting_cc_ua >> >> And we'll retry. I think you need to set this on all resumed >> devices. > > Actually, it's not quite that easy, we filter out this ASC/ASCQ > combination from the check because we should never ignore medium might > have changed events on running devices. We could ignore it if we had a > flag to say the power has been yanked (perhaps an additional sdev flag > you set on resume) but we would still miss the case where you really > had powered off the drive and then changed the media ... if you can > regard this as the user's problem, then we might have a solution. > > James > oh I see what you mean now, thanks for the ellaboration. if I do the following change, things all look normal and runtime pm works. I'm not 100% sure if just setting expecting_cc_ua in resume() is "correct" but that looks like it is what you're talking about: (note that this is of course with the one block layer diff applied that Alan posted a few emails back) --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c @@ -554,16 +554,8 @@ int scsi_check_sense(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd) * so that we can deal with it there. */ if (scmd->device->expecting_cc_ua) { - /* - * Because some device does not queue unit - * attentions correctly, we carefully check - * additional sense code and qualifier so as - * not to squash media change unit attention. - */ - if (sshdr.asc != 0x28 || sshdr.ascq != 0x00) { - scmd->device->expecting_cc_ua = 0; - return NEEDS_RETRY; - } + scmd->device->expecting_cc_ua = 0; + return NEEDS_RETRY; } /* * we might also expect a cc/ua if another LUN on the target diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c index d90fefffe31b..5ad847fed8b9 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c @@ -3642,6 +3642,8 @@ static int sd_resume(struct device *dev) if (!sdkp) /* E.g.: runtime resume at the start of sd_probe() */ return 0; + sdkp->device->expecting_cc_ua = 1; + if (!sdkp->device->manage_start_stop) return 0;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-29 15:40 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-06-23 11:10 Martin Kepplinger 2020-06-24 13:33 ` Bart Van Assche 2020-06-25 8:16 ` Martin Kepplinger 2020-06-25 14:52 ` Alan Stern 2020-06-26 3:53 ` Bart Van Assche 2020-06-26 15:07 ` Bart Van Assche 2020-06-26 15:44 ` Alan Stern 2020-06-28 2:37 ` Bart Van Assche 2020-06-28 13:10 ` Alan Stern 2020-06-29 9:42 ` Martin Kepplinger 2020-06-29 16:15 ` Alan Stern 2020-06-29 16:56 ` Bart Van Assche 2020-06-29 17:40 ` Alan Stern 2020-06-30 3:33 ` Martin Kepplinger 2020-06-30 13:38 ` Alan Stern 2020-06-30 15:59 ` Bart Van Assche 2020-06-30 18:02 ` Alan Stern 2020-06-30 19:23 ` Bart Van Assche 2020-06-30 19:38 ` Alan Stern 2020-06-30 23:31 ` Bart Van Assche 2020-07-01 0:49 ` Alan Stern 2020-07-06 16:41 ` Alan Stern 2020-07-28 7:02 ` Martin Kepplinger 2020-07-28 20:02 ` Alan Stern 2020-07-29 14:12 ` Martin Kepplinger 2020-07-29 14:32 ` Alan Stern 2020-07-29 14:44 ` Martin K. Petersen 2020-07-29 14:56 ` Alan Stern 2020-07-29 14:46 ` James Bottomley 2020-07-29 14:53 ` James Bottomley 2020-07-29 15:40 ` Martin Kepplinger [this message] 2020-07-29 15:44 ` James Bottomley 2020-07-29 16:43 ` Martin Kepplinger 2020-07-29 18:25 ` Alan Stern 2020-07-29 18:29 ` James Bottomley 2020-07-30 8:52 ` Martin Kepplinger 2020-07-30 8:54 ` Martin Kepplinger 2020-07-30 15:10 ` Alan Stern 2020-08-04 9:39 ` Martin Kepplinger 2020-08-07 9:51 ` Martin Kepplinger 2020-08-07 14:30 ` Alan Stern 2020-08-08 6:59 ` Martin Kepplinger 2020-08-08 15:05 ` Alan Stern 2020-08-09 9:20 ` Martin Kepplinger 2020-08-09 15:26 ` Alan Stern 2020-08-10 12:03 ` Martin Kepplinger 2020-08-10 14:13 ` Alan Stern 2020-08-11 7:55 ` Martin Kepplinger 2020-08-11 13:48 ` Alan Stern 2020-08-23 14:57 ` [PATCH] block: Fix bug in runtime-resume handling Alan Stern 2020-08-24 17:48 ` Bart Van Assche 2020-08-24 20:13 ` Alan Stern 2020-08-26 7:48 ` Martin Kepplinger 2020-08-27 17:42 ` Martin Kepplinger 2020-08-27 20:29 ` Alan Stern 2020-08-29 7:24 ` Martin Kepplinger 2020-08-29 15:26 ` Alan Stern 2020-08-29 16:33 ` Martin Kepplinger 2020-08-29 18:56 ` Alan Stern 2020-08-30 0:38 ` Bart Van Assche 2020-08-30 1:06 ` Alan Stern 2020-07-29 15:40 ` [PATCH] scsi: sd: add runtime pm to open / release Alan Stern 2020-07-29 15:49 ` James Bottomley 2020-07-29 16:17 ` Alan Stern 2020-07-29 15:52 ` Martin Kepplinger 2020-07-29 18:10 ` Douglas Gilbert 2020-07-30 8:05 ` Martin Kepplinger 2020-07-30 15:14 ` Alan Stern
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=d9bb92e9-23fa-306f-c7f2-71a81ab28811@puri.sm \ --to=martin.kepplinger@puri.sm \ --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \ --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \ --cc=cang@codeaurora.org \ --cc=kernel@puri.sm \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \ --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \ --subject='Re: [PATCH] scsi: sd: add runtime pm to open / release' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.