From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dustin Kirkland <kirkland@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: KVM usability
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 08:54:26 -0600
Message-ID: <d9c105ea1003020654x50282cdbkec4315f7c7831dfa@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20100226090147.GH15885@elte.hu> <20100226103545.GA7463@elte.hu>
	 <4B87A6BF.3090301@redhat.com> <20100226111734.GE7463@elte.hu>
	 <4B8813F2.8090208@redhat.com> <20100227105643.GA17425@elte.hu>
	 <d9c105ea1003011312s935c3c5haa1ec80aebe14d88@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4B8C38B8.8010007@codemonkey.ws> <1267498953.2460.32.camel@x200>
	 <20100302082118.GT1924@arachsys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, ming.m.lin@intel.com,
	sheng.yang@intel.com, Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>,
	KVM General <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Zachary Amsden <zamsden@redhat.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	"Fr??d??ric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Chris Webb <chris@arachsys.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-fx0-f219.google.com ([209.85.220.219]:61919 "EHLO
	mail-fx0-f219.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753644Ab0CBOy2 (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 2 Mar 2010 09:54:28 -0500
Received: by fxm19 with SMTP id 19so362505fxm.21
        for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 06:54:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20100302082118.GT1924@arachsys.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 2:21 AM, Chris Webb <chris@arachsys.com> wrote:
> I remember about a year ago, someone asserting on the list that -usbdevice
> tablet was very CPU intensive even when not in use, and should be avoided if
> mouse support wasn't needed, e.g. on non-graphical VMs. Was that actually a
> significant hit, and is it still true today?

I don't notice a difference from a functional standpoint.

:-Dustin