All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	"Janosch Frank" <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
	"Cornelia Huck" <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>, "Peter Xu" <peterx@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: selftests: Implement ucall() for s390x
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 11:43:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d9cb3c86-6390-3803-f2c6-d47f5c24139f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190730104807.7uzuvd52foybakgu@kamzik.brq.redhat.com>

On 30/07/2019 12.48, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 12:01:11PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On s390x, we can neither exit via PIO nor MMIO, but have to use
>> an instruction like DIAGNOSE. While we're at it, rename UCALL_PIO
>> to UCALL_DEFAULT, since PIO only works on x86 anyway, and this
>> way we can re-use the "default" type for the DIAGNOSE exit on s390x.
>>
>> Now that ucall() is implemented, we can use it in the sync_reg_test
>> on s390x, too.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  .../testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h  |  2 +-
>>  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/ucall.c       | 34 +++++++++++++++----
>>  .../selftests/kvm/s390x/sync_regs_test.c      |  6 ++--
>>  3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
>> index e0e66b115ef2..c37aea2e33e5 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
>> @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ int vm_create_device(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct kvm_create_device *cd);
>>  
>>  /* ucall implementation types */
>>  typedef enum {
>> -	UCALL_PIO,
>> +	UCALL_DEFAULT,
> 
> I'd rather we keep explicit types defined; keep PIO and add DIAG. Then
> we can have
> 
> /*  Set default ucall types */
> #if defined(__x86_64__)
>   ucall_type = UCALL_PIO;
> #elif defined(__aarch64__)
>   ucall_type = UCALL_MMIO;
>   ucall_requires_init = true;
> #elif defined(__s390x__)
>   ucall_type = UCALL_DIAG;
> #endif
> 
> And add an assert in get_ucall()
> 
>  assert(!ucall_requires_init || ucall_initialized);

I'm not sure whether I really like that. It's yet another additional
#ifdef block, and yet another variable ...

What do you think about removing the enum completely and simply code it
directly, without the ucall_type indirection, i.e.:

void ucall(uint64_t cmd, int nargs, ...)
{
	struct ucall uc = {
		.cmd = cmd,
	};
	va_list va;
	int i;

	nargs = nargs <= UCALL_MAX_ARGS ? nargs : UCALL_MAX_ARGS;

	va_start(va, nargs);
	for (i = 0; i < nargs; ++i)
		uc.args[i] = va_arg(va, uint64_t);
	va_end(va);

#if defined(__x86_64__)

	/* Exit via PIO */
	asm volatile("in %[port], %%al"
		: : [port] "d" (UCALL_PIO_PORT), "D" (&uc) : "rax");

#elif defined(__aarch64__)

	*ucall_exit_mmio_addr = (vm_vaddr_t)&uc;

#elif defined(__s390x__)

	/* Exit via DIAGNOSE 0x501 (normally used for breakpoints) */
	asm volatile ("diag 0,%0,0x501" : : "a"(&uc) : "memory");

#endif
}

I think that's way less confusing than having to understand the meaning
of ucall_type etc. before...?

 Thomas

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-31  9:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-30 10:01 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: selftests: Enable ucall and dirty_log_test on s390x Thomas Huth
2019-07-30 10:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: selftests: Implement ucall() for s390x Thomas Huth
2019-07-30 10:48   ` Andrew Jones
2019-07-31  9:43     ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2019-07-31 10:28       ` Andrew Jones
2019-07-31 11:16         ` Thomas Huth
2019-07-31 12:57           ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-31 13:05             ` Andrew Jones
2019-07-30 10:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: selftests: Enable dirty_log_test on s390x Thomas Huth
2019-07-30 10:57   ` Andrew Jones
2019-07-31  8:19     ` Thomas Huth
2019-07-31  8:44       ` Andrew Jones
2019-07-31 12:58       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-30 11:35   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-30 14:57   ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-07-30 17:11     ` Thomas Huth
2019-07-30 18:04       ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-07-31 11:06         ` David Hildenbrand
2019-07-30 19:06     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-31  7:16       ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-07-30 11:36 ` [PATCH 0/2] KVM: selftests: Enable ucall and " Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d9cb3c86-6390-3803-f2c6-d47f5c24139f@redhat.com \
    --to=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.