From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757442AbcJQG0h (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2016 02:26:37 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-f67.google.com ([209.85.215.67]:35888 "EHLO mail-lf0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757135AbcJQG0T (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2016 02:26:19 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] external array access helpers To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Vegard Nossum References: <20161016151616.31451-1-vegard.nossum@oracle.com> <20161016161400.GA19899@kroah.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , "Luis R . Rodriguez" From: Jiri Slaby Message-ID: Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 08:26:14 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161016161400.GA19899@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/16/2016, 06:14 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > Is gcc 7.0 "stable" enough that people will start to be using it soon? Standard suse kernel builds and boots with gcc 7 just fine. But only with 02/12 from this series. So perhaps it's not stable enough for production use, but at least I was about to test use-after-scope gcc 7 UBSAN thingie via syzkaller soon. thanks, -- js suse labs