All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	devel@acpica.org
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>,
	Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
	Erik Kaneda <erik.kaneda@intel.com>,
	laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com,
	kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Introduce intel_skl_int3472 module
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 15:12:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dbc269f9-c76f-04f9-0900-22171c3ef3a3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f2d8e74f-f33b-2489-1b90-b11bf7465d19@redhat.com>

Hi again,

On 5/25/21 3:10 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> On 5/20/21 4:09 PM, Daniel Scally wrote:
>> Hello all
>>
>> Apologies for the long delay since the last version of this series; the time I
>> had free to work on it became somewhat restrained.
> 
> No worries, thank you for all the work you are putting into this.
> 
> I have not taken a close look at the code yet, but I see that Andy has and
> the amount of remarks which he has on patch 7/8 which is the big one seems
> to be limited, so I believe that we are getting close to this being ready
> for merging.
> 
> This touches a lot of subsystems, so we need to come up with a plan to
> merge this. Here is my proposal for how to do this:
> 
> 1/8   ACPI: scan: Extend acpi_walk_dep_device_list()
> 2/8   ACPI: scan: Add function to fetch dependent of acpi device
> 3/8   i2c: core: Add a format macro for I2C device names
> 4/8   gpiolib: acpi: Export acpi_get_gpiod()
> 5/8   clkdev: Make clkdev_drop() null aware
> 6/8   gpiolib: acpi: Add acpi_gpio_get_io_resource()
> 7/8   platform/x86: Add intel_skl_int3472 driver
> 8/8   mfd: tps68470: Remove tps68470 MFD driver
> 
> Rafael already indicated that he wants to merge 1/8 (and presumably also 2/8)
> through his tree and that he will provide an immutable branch with those
> for merging into the pdx86 tree.

p.s.

Daniel it would be good if you can at least send a v5 of patch 2/8 with
the suggested renames, then Rafael can merge 1/8 + 2/8 and we are down to 6
patches (4 if we also merge the i2c + clk patches independently).

Regards,

Hans


> 4/8 and 6/8 are both gpiolib-acpi patches and seem to be ready for merging
> now, perhaps the gpiolib-acpi maintainers can already merge these and also
> provide an immutable branch ?  Andy/Mika ?
> 
> 3/8 and 5/8 seem to be nice cleanups, but not really necessary. IMHO it
> would be best to park these cleanups for later and for 3/8 add the following
> where necessary for now:
> 
> /* FIXME drop this once the I2C_DEV_NAME_FORMAT macro has been added to include/linux/i2c.h */
> #ifndef I2C_DEV_NAME_FORMAT
> #define I2C_DEV_NAME_FORMAT		"i2c-%s"
> #endif
> 
> This is not the prettiest but it reduces all the subsys cross-deps and things
> like this have been done before for similar reasons.
> 
> Likewise it would be good if you can add if (foo) as condition before any
> clkdev_drop(foo) calls in this patch-set and then merge
> 5/8 "clkdev: Make clkdev_drop() null aware" independently of this and then
> once both are in Linux tree follow-up with a cleanup patch dropping the if (foo)
> guards.
> 
> So this would leave as deps for 7/8 just the 2 ACPI and 2 gpiolib-acpi patches
> which I can hopefully pull-in via immutable branches and then we are good.
> 
> AFAICT patch 8/8 can be merged independently once 7/8 hits for-next (IOW once
> we are sure the next kernel will have 7/8).
> 
> 
> 
> Or alternatively one of the involved subsys maintainers just merges the entire
> set (once it is ready) and then provides an immutable branch with the entire set
> on top of 5.13-rc1 (or 5.14-rc1). But that requires acks from all the other
> subsys maintainers. Note I'm fine with either approach.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Hans
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> v1 for this series was originally 14-18 of this series:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/20201130133129.1024662-1-djrscally@gmail.com/T/#m91934e12e3d033da2e768e952ea3b4a125ee3e67
>>
>> v2 was here:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/platform-driver-x86/20210118003428.568892-1-djrscally@gmail.com/
>>
>> v3 was here:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210222130735.1313443-1-djrscally@gmail.com/
>>
>> Series level changelog:
>>
>> 	- Added patch 5/8 to make clkdev_drop() NULL aware to simplify error
>> 	handling.
>> 	- Added patch 6/8 to add acpi_gpio_get_io_resource().
>>
>> This has been tested on a number of devices, but currently **not** on a device
>> designed for ChromeOS, which we ideally need to do to ensure no regression
>> caused by replacing the tps68470 MFD driver. Unfortunately, I don't have a
>> device to test it on myself.
>>
>> =========== Original Cover Letter ===========
>>
>> At the moment in the kernel the ACPI _HID INT3472 is taken by the tps68470
>> MFD driver, but that driver can only handle some of the cases of that _HID
>> that we see. There are at least these three possibilities:
>>
>> 1. INT3472 devices that provide GPIOs through the usual framework and run
>>    power and clocks through an operation region; this is the situation that
>>    the current module handles and is seen on ChromeOS devices
>> 2. INT3472 devices that provide GPIOs, plus clocks and regulators that are
>>    meant to be driven through the usual frameworks, usually seen on devices
>>    designed to run Windows
>> 3. INT3472 devices that don't actually represent a physical tps68470, but
>>    are being used as a convenient way of grouping a bunch of system GPIO
>>    lines that are intended to enable power and clocks for sensors which
>>    are called out as dependent on them. Also seen on devices designed to
>>    run Windows.
>>
>> This series introduces a new module which registers:
>>
>> 1. An i2c driver that determines which scenario (#1 or #2) applies to the
>>    machine and registers platform devices to be bound to GPIO, OpRegion,
>>    clock and regulator drivers as appropriate.
>> 2. A platform driver that binds to the dummy INT3472 devices described in
>>    #3
>>
>> The platform driver for the dummy device registers the GPIO lines that
>> enable the clocks and regulators to the sensors via those frameworks so
>> that sensor drivers can consume them in the usual fashion. The existing
>> GPIO and OpRegion tps68470 drivers will work with the i2c driver that's
>> registered. Clock and regulator drivers are available but have not so far been
>> tested, so aren't part of this series.
>>
>> The existing mfd/tps68470.c driver being thus superseded, it is removed.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Dan
>>
>> Daniel Scally (8):
>>   ACPI: scan: Extend acpi_walk_dep_device_list()
>>   ACPI: scan: Add function to fetch dependent of acpi device
>>   i2c: core: Add a format macro for I2C device names
>>   gpiolib: acpi: Export acpi_get_gpiod()
>>   clkdev: Make clkdev_drop() null aware
>>   gpiolib: acpi: Add acpi_gpio_get_io_resource()
>>   platform/x86: Add intel_skl_int3472 driver
>>   mfd: tps68470: Remove tps68470 MFD driver
>>
>>  MAINTAINERS                                   |   5 +
>>  drivers/acpi/ec.c                             |   2 +-
>>  drivers/acpi/pmic/Kconfig                     |   2 +-
>>  drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c       |   2 +-
>>  drivers/acpi/scan.c                           | 107 ++++-
>>  drivers/clk/clkdev.c                          |   3 +
>>  drivers/gpio/Kconfig                          |   2 +-
>>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c                   |  61 ++-
>>  drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c                   |   8 +-
>>  drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c                   |   4 +-
>>  drivers/mfd/Kconfig                           |  18 -
>>  drivers/mfd/Makefile                          |   1 -
>>  drivers/mfd/tps68470.c                        |  97 -----
>>  drivers/platform/surface/aggregator/core.c    |   6 +-
>>  drivers/platform/surface/surface3_power.c     |  22 +-
>>  .../platform/surface/surface_acpi_notify.c    |   7 +-
>>  drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig                  |   2 +
>>  drivers/platform/x86/Makefile                 |   1 +
>>  drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/Kconfig    |  31 ++
>>  drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/Makefile   |   5 +
>>  .../intel_skl_int3472_clk_and_regulator.c     | 195 +++++++++
>>  .../intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_common.c  | 106 +++++
>>  .../intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_common.h  | 113 +++++
>>  .../intel_skl_int3472_discrete.c              | 409 ++++++++++++++++++
>>  .../intel_skl_int3472_tps68470.c              | 109 +++++
>>  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h                       |   8 +
>>  include/linux/acpi.h                          |  11 +-
>>  include/linux/gpio/consumer.h                 |   2 +
>>  include/linux/i2c.h                           |   3 +
>>  29 files changed, 1175 insertions(+), 167 deletions(-)
>>  delete mode 100644 drivers/mfd/tps68470.c
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/Kconfig
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/Makefile
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_clk_and_regulator.c
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_common.c
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_common.h
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_discrete.c
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_tps68470.c
>>


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	devel@acpica.org
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>,
	Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
	Erik Kaneda <erik.kaneda@intel.com>,
	laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com,
	kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Introduce intel_skl_int3472 module
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 15:12:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dbc269f9-c76f-04f9-0900-22171c3ef3a3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f2d8e74f-f33b-2489-1b90-b11bf7465d19@redhat.com>

Hi again,

On 5/25/21 3:10 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> On 5/20/21 4:09 PM, Daniel Scally wrote:
>> Hello all
>>
>> Apologies for the long delay since the last version of this series; the time I
>> had free to work on it became somewhat restrained.
> 
> No worries, thank you for all the work you are putting into this.
> 
> I have not taken a close look at the code yet, but I see that Andy has and
> the amount of remarks which he has on patch 7/8 which is the big one seems
> to be limited, so I believe that we are getting close to this being ready
> for merging.
> 
> This touches a lot of subsystems, so we need to come up with a plan to
> merge this. Here is my proposal for how to do this:
> 
> 1/8   ACPI: scan: Extend acpi_walk_dep_device_list()
> 2/8   ACPI: scan: Add function to fetch dependent of acpi device
> 3/8   i2c: core: Add a format macro for I2C device names
> 4/8   gpiolib: acpi: Export acpi_get_gpiod()
> 5/8   clkdev: Make clkdev_drop() null aware
> 6/8   gpiolib: acpi: Add acpi_gpio_get_io_resource()
> 7/8   platform/x86: Add intel_skl_int3472 driver
> 8/8   mfd: tps68470: Remove tps68470 MFD driver
> 
> Rafael already indicated that he wants to merge 1/8 (and presumably also 2/8)
> through his tree and that he will provide an immutable branch with those
> for merging into the pdx86 tree.

p.s.

Daniel it would be good if you can at least send a v5 of patch 2/8 with
the suggested renames, then Rafael can merge 1/8 + 2/8 and we are down to 6
patches (4 if we also merge the i2c + clk patches independently).

Regards,

Hans


> 4/8 and 6/8 are both gpiolib-acpi patches and seem to be ready for merging
> now, perhaps the gpiolib-acpi maintainers can already merge these and also
> provide an immutable branch ?  Andy/Mika ?
> 
> 3/8 and 5/8 seem to be nice cleanups, but not really necessary. IMHO it
> would be best to park these cleanups for later and for 3/8 add the following
> where necessary for now:
> 
> /* FIXME drop this once the I2C_DEV_NAME_FORMAT macro has been added to include/linux/i2c.h */
> #ifndef I2C_DEV_NAME_FORMAT
> #define I2C_DEV_NAME_FORMAT		"i2c-%s"
> #endif
> 
> This is not the prettiest but it reduces all the subsys cross-deps and things
> like this have been done before for similar reasons.
> 
> Likewise it would be good if you can add if (foo) as condition before any
> clkdev_drop(foo) calls in this patch-set and then merge
> 5/8 "clkdev: Make clkdev_drop() null aware" independently of this and then
> once both are in Linux tree follow-up with a cleanup patch dropping the if (foo)
> guards.
> 
> So this would leave as deps for 7/8 just the 2 ACPI and 2 gpiolib-acpi patches
> which I can hopefully pull-in via immutable branches and then we are good.
> 
> AFAICT patch 8/8 can be merged independently once 7/8 hits for-next (IOW once
> we are sure the next kernel will have 7/8).
> 
> 
> 
> Or alternatively one of the involved subsys maintainers just merges the entire
> set (once it is ready) and then provides an immutable branch with the entire set
> on top of 5.13-rc1 (or 5.14-rc1). But that requires acks from all the other
> subsys maintainers. Note I'm fine with either approach.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Hans
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> v1 for this series was originally 14-18 of this series:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/20201130133129.1024662-1-djrscally@gmail.com/T/#m91934e12e3d033da2e768e952ea3b4a125ee3e67
>>
>> v2 was here:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/platform-driver-x86/20210118003428.568892-1-djrscally@gmail.com/
>>
>> v3 was here:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210222130735.1313443-1-djrscally@gmail.com/
>>
>> Series level changelog:
>>
>> 	- Added patch 5/8 to make clkdev_drop() NULL aware to simplify error
>> 	handling.
>> 	- Added patch 6/8 to add acpi_gpio_get_io_resource().
>>
>> This has been tested on a number of devices, but currently **not** on a device
>> designed for ChromeOS, which we ideally need to do to ensure no regression
>> caused by replacing the tps68470 MFD driver. Unfortunately, I don't have a
>> device to test it on myself.
>>
>> =========== Original Cover Letter ===========
>>
>> At the moment in the kernel the ACPI _HID INT3472 is taken by the tps68470
>> MFD driver, but that driver can only handle some of the cases of that _HID
>> that we see. There are at least these three possibilities:
>>
>> 1. INT3472 devices that provide GPIOs through the usual framework and run
>>    power and clocks through an operation region; this is the situation that
>>    the current module handles and is seen on ChromeOS devices
>> 2. INT3472 devices that provide GPIOs, plus clocks and regulators that are
>>    meant to be driven through the usual frameworks, usually seen on devices
>>    designed to run Windows
>> 3. INT3472 devices that don't actually represent a physical tps68470, but
>>    are being used as a convenient way of grouping a bunch of system GPIO
>>    lines that are intended to enable power and clocks for sensors which
>>    are called out as dependent on them. Also seen on devices designed to
>>    run Windows.
>>
>> This series introduces a new module which registers:
>>
>> 1. An i2c driver that determines which scenario (#1 or #2) applies to the
>>    machine and registers platform devices to be bound to GPIO, OpRegion,
>>    clock and regulator drivers as appropriate.
>> 2. A platform driver that binds to the dummy INT3472 devices described in
>>    #3
>>
>> The platform driver for the dummy device registers the GPIO lines that
>> enable the clocks and regulators to the sensors via those frameworks so
>> that sensor drivers can consume them in the usual fashion. The existing
>> GPIO and OpRegion tps68470 drivers will work with the i2c driver that's
>> registered. Clock and regulator drivers are available but have not so far been
>> tested, so aren't part of this series.
>>
>> The existing mfd/tps68470.c driver being thus superseded, it is removed.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Dan
>>
>> Daniel Scally (8):
>>   ACPI: scan: Extend acpi_walk_dep_device_list()
>>   ACPI: scan: Add function to fetch dependent of acpi device
>>   i2c: core: Add a format macro for I2C device names
>>   gpiolib: acpi: Export acpi_get_gpiod()
>>   clkdev: Make clkdev_drop() null aware
>>   gpiolib: acpi: Add acpi_gpio_get_io_resource()
>>   platform/x86: Add intel_skl_int3472 driver
>>   mfd: tps68470: Remove tps68470 MFD driver
>>
>>  MAINTAINERS                                   |   5 +
>>  drivers/acpi/ec.c                             |   2 +-
>>  drivers/acpi/pmic/Kconfig                     |   2 +-
>>  drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c       |   2 +-
>>  drivers/acpi/scan.c                           | 107 ++++-
>>  drivers/clk/clkdev.c                          |   3 +
>>  drivers/gpio/Kconfig                          |   2 +-
>>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c                   |  61 ++-
>>  drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c                   |   8 +-
>>  drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c                   |   4 +-
>>  drivers/mfd/Kconfig                           |  18 -
>>  drivers/mfd/Makefile                          |   1 -
>>  drivers/mfd/tps68470.c                        |  97 -----
>>  drivers/platform/surface/aggregator/core.c    |   6 +-
>>  drivers/platform/surface/surface3_power.c     |  22 +-
>>  .../platform/surface/surface_acpi_notify.c    |   7 +-
>>  drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig                  |   2 +
>>  drivers/platform/x86/Makefile                 |   1 +
>>  drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/Kconfig    |  31 ++
>>  drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/Makefile   |   5 +
>>  .../intel_skl_int3472_clk_and_regulator.c     | 195 +++++++++
>>  .../intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_common.c  | 106 +++++
>>  .../intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_common.h  | 113 +++++
>>  .../intel_skl_int3472_discrete.c              | 409 ++++++++++++++++++
>>  .../intel_skl_int3472_tps68470.c              | 109 +++++
>>  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h                       |   8 +
>>  include/linux/acpi.h                          |  11 +-
>>  include/linux/gpio/consumer.h                 |   2 +
>>  include/linux/i2c.h                           |   3 +
>>  29 files changed, 1175 insertions(+), 167 deletions(-)
>>  delete mode 100644 drivers/mfd/tps68470.c
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/Kconfig
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/Makefile
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_clk_and_regulator.c
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_common.c
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_common.h
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_discrete.c
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_tps68470.c
>>


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-25 13:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-20 14:09 [PATCH v4 0/8] Introduce intel_skl_int3472 module Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 14:09 ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 14:09 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] ACPI: scan: Extend acpi_walk_dep_device_list() Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 14:09   ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 17:15   ` Maximilian Luz
2021-05-20 17:15     ` Maximilian Luz
2021-05-20 18:22   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-05-20 18:22     ` [Devel] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-05-20 18:22     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-05-20 21:03     ` Hans de Goede
2021-05-20 21:03       ` Hans de Goede
2021-05-21 12:59   ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-21 12:59     ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-20 14:09 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] ACPI: scan: Add function to fetch dependent of acpi device Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 14:09   ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 18:33   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-05-20 18:33     ` [Devel] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-05-20 18:33     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-05-20 18:55     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-05-20 18:55       ` [Devel] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-05-20 18:55       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-05-21 19:25       ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-21 19:25         ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 14:09 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] i2c: core: Add a format macro for I2C device names Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 14:09   ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 14:09 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] gpiolib: acpi: Export acpi_get_gpiod() Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 14:09   ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 14:09 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] clkdev: Make clkdev_drop() null aware Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 14:09   ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 14:09 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] gpiolib: acpi: Add acpi_gpio_get_io_resource() Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 14:09   ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-21 12:05   ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-21 12:05     ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-25 22:30     ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-25 22:30       ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 14:09 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] platform/x86: Add intel_skl_int3472 driver Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 14:09   ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-21 12:57   ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-21 12:57     ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-25 22:53     ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-25 22:53       ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-26  7:54       ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-26  7:54         ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-20 14:09 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] mfd: tps68470: Remove tps68470 MFD driver Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 14:09   ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-25 13:10 ` [PATCH v4 0/8] Introduce intel_skl_int3472 module Hans de Goede
2021-05-25 13:10   ` Hans de Goede
2021-05-25 13:12   ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2021-05-25 13:12     ` Hans de Goede
2021-05-25 13:23     ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-25 13:23       ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-25 23:03   ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-25 23:03     ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-26  7:55     ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-26  7:55       ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-26 12:36     ` Hans de Goede
2021-05-26 12:36       ` Hans de Goede

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dbc269f9-c76f-04f9-0900-22171c3ef3a3@redhat.com \
    --to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=devel@acpica.org \
    --cc=djrscally@gmail.com \
    --cc=erik.kaneda@intel.com \
    --cc=kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=luzmaximilian@gmail.com \
    --cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
    --cc=wsa@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.