From: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, oleg@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
jolsa@kernel.org, Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ak@linux.intel.com, kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, mark.rutland@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] perf/core: Fake regs for leaked kernel samples
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 16:31:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dbc68bbf-b1a8-77ab-c89c-2d890a0382cc@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200811075924.GU3982@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Hi Peter,
On 8/11/2020 3:59 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 03:50:43PM +0800, Jin, Yao wrote:
>> Could I post v2 which basically refers to your patch but removes some
>> conditions since I see some issues in test if we use these conditions.
>>
>> 1. Remove '!event->attr.exclude_hv || !event->attr.exclude_host ||
>> !event->attr.exclude_guest' at the entry of sanitize_sample_regs().
>>
>> 2. Remove '!attr.exclude_hv || !attr.exclude_host || !attr.exclude_guest'
>> at the perf_event_open syscall entry.
>
> exclude_host, maybe -- due to the dodgy semantics of it, but the others
> should definitely be there.
>
exclude_guest and exclude_hv are tricky too.
If we do 'perf record -e cycles:u' in both host and guest, we can see:
event->attr.exclude_guest = 0
thus sanitize_sample_regs() returns regs directly even if exclude_kernel = 1.
And in guest, exclude_hv = 0, it's out of my expectation too.
Thanks
Jin Yao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-11 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-31 2:56 [PATCH v1 1/2] Missing instruction_pointer_set() instances Jin Yao
2020-07-31 2:56 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] perf/core: Fake regs for leaked kernel samples Jin Yao
2020-08-04 11:49 ` peterz
2020-08-05 2:15 ` Jin, Yao
2020-08-05 12:44 ` peterz
2020-08-05 12:57 ` peterz
2020-08-06 2:26 ` Jin, Yao
2020-08-06 9:18 ` peterz
2020-08-06 9:24 ` peterz
2020-08-07 5:32 ` Jin, Yao
2020-08-06 11:00 ` peterz
2020-08-07 6:24 ` Jin, Yao
2020-08-07 9:02 ` peterz
2020-08-10 2:03 ` Jin, Yao
2020-08-07 5:23 ` Jin, Yao
2020-08-11 7:50 ` Jin, Yao
2020-08-11 7:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-11 8:31 ` Jin, Yao [this message]
2020-08-11 8:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-12 3:52 ` Jin, Yao
2020-08-12 7:25 ` Like Xu
2020-08-04 11:31 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] Missing instruction_pointer_set() instances peterz
2020-08-05 0:26 ` Jin, Yao
2020-08-04 21:31 ` Max Filippov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dbc68bbf-b1a8-77ab-c89c-2d890a0382cc@linux.intel.com \
--to=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yao.jin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.