From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Casey Bodley Subject: Re: [rgw multisite] disable specified bucket data sync Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 16:42:43 -0400 Message-ID: References: <7BD28126D6935A4498AE6DE60B5D4CAB314C2E40@H3CMLB12-EX.srv.huawei-3com.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from mail-qk0-f180.google.com ([209.85.220.180]:34301 "EHLO mail-qk0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755150AbcHBUmq (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 16:42:46 -0400 Received: by mail-qk0-f180.google.com with SMTP id p186so60519201qkd.1 for ; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 13:42:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7BD28126D6935A4498AE6DE60B5D4CAB314C2E40@H3CMLB12-EX.srv.huawei-3com.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Zhangzengran Cc: "yehuda@redhat.com" , "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" On 08/02/2016 03:34 AM, Zhangzengran wrote: > Hi Casey: > Why don’t support stopping specified bucket data sync. Is there any difficulty in implementing the feature? > Or am I missing something? > > Thank you ! > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > 本邮件及其附件含有杭州华三通信技术有限公司的保密信息，仅限于发送给上面地址中列出 > 的个人或群组。禁止任何其他人以任何形式使用（包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、 > 或散发）本邮件中的信息。如果您错收了本邮件，请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本 > 邮件！ > This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from H3C, which is > intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the > information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial > disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended > recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender > by phone or email immediately and delete it! Hi, What would you like to get out of this feature? A way to disable sync on a given bucket temporarily, and turn it back on later? Or just a way to have a subset of buckets that don't ever participate in sync? Do you have a use case for the first? That's not something we'd considered. If you just want to have some buckets that never sync, you might consider serving those out of a separate gateway, in a zone that isn't part of a multisite configuration. Thanks, Casey