From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80EB1C433F5 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 17:45:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230007AbhLNRpS (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:45:18 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-f182.google.com ([209.85.215.182]:44769 "EHLO mail-pg1-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229545AbhLNRpR (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:45:17 -0500 Received: by mail-pg1-f182.google.com with SMTP id m15so17885192pgu.11 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:45:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Z4DDSHz9TFLFqiYsJb52eLOQw68Il9LpLeCc+MHcz6k=; b=qYJ3b02YxkjgB9il9QYVqgqTwdG+inSMrmwdN6/Lm5TXEKYQIFvYbNoSatF4P/IXV9 21GgaZ+M13ZWW714GWjHRzNTxo3SOh0yhYf4GG1JaaDccu7IaJRE63ePQSqhdlclWjiG DUS4LaYROYYdOrVruZzzPRCSmPD9nFZKwhpb09vATaIrifvkrVOXlznjCtaofC02VVom XwOCCuBgT8XyH3vg822yIbNkp8mGkcncIr5Zd0sfQQ1mYeKw7xHJQ/IQ06EzBvhxVHVD bgPFXlx8T+uHHnIF98Vb9AjKArB3Ejc1lUNZ0NH7krU6QVkSxpcIOgT/RsodP89fgSWz /KJQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Wj2cizDQ5rgVEV3HVjoDIc11kSg7ndDy3ewUry3/I9prJn3j7 cS03Q9223A53cuLUd5+Yp0w= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwX5lC14D9dSL2X1514yAclN03jOtKj4Emg9nb8kWPrBVqlCHah6FrE6ivFk4nd1YEUketd8w== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9a4e:0:b0:4a2:71f9:21e0 with SMTP id x14-20020aa79a4e000000b004a271f921e0mr5334318pfj.77.1639503917152; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:45:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2620:0:1000:2514:d051:c5f6:2f2a:19ae? ([2620:0:1000:2514:d051:c5f6:2f2a:19ae]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s24sm429625pfm.100.2021.12.14.09.45.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:45:16 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Improve SCSI abort handling To: James Bottomley , "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: Santosh Yaraganavi , Can Guo , Bean Huo , Vishak G , Stanley Chu , Adrian Hunter , Jaegeuk Kim , Girish K S , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Asutosh Das , Vinayak Holikatti References: <20211104181059.4129537-1-bvanassche@acm.org> <163729506335.21244.1193812894951616835.b4-ty@oracle.com> <5a5cd1dde61e656e15df3767e1a6d2cc362d280d.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <1fed2928-a021-dcb9-18bb-3167fe23420a@acm.org> From: Bart Van Assche Message-ID: Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:45:14 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 12/14/21 9:43 AM, James Bottomley wrote: > I meant the effect of the fixes patch can be dropped in the merge > commit. So the sole surviving code is from the misc tree. Like what I > did at the top of the for-next branch: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=014adbc9a838772b265834a55cd7b13eb2665d7e Thanks for the clarification. The ufshcd_abort() code at the above URL looks good to me. Thanks, Bart.