From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: santosh Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] make dpdk iova aware Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 10:42:24 +0530 Message-ID: References: <20170905103119.20511-1-santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com> <20171020123136.10557-1-santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com> <8773955.bCW0FxgjuB@xps> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, olivier.matz@6wind.com, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, anatoly.burakov@intel.com To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from NAM02-BL2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2nam02on0072.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.38.72]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 801D71B723 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 07:12:43 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <8773955.bCW0FxgjuB@xps> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Thomas, On Monday 23 October 2017 08:28 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 20/10/2017 14:31, Santosh Shukla: >> v3: >> Include v2 review comment and rebased on >> top of upstream tip commit:6b9ed026a8704 >> >> >> v2: >> Include build fixes reported in patchworks. > Please fix checkpatch issues, thanks > Checkpatch warning coming from legacy code, not from iova change, Same mentioned down in cover letter. Will address them in v4.. After we conclude on your proposition on [5/6] patch of this series. Thanks.